{"id": 449565204, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk1NjUyMDQ=", "number": 23, "title": "Syntactic sugar for creating m2m records", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2019-05-29T02:17:48Z", "updated_at": "2019-08-04T03:54:58Z", "closed_at": "2019-08-04T03:37:34Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Python library only. What would be a syntactically pleasant way of creating a m2m record?", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/23/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 449818897, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4MTg4OTc=", "number": 24, "title": "Additional Column Constraints?", "user": {"value": 98555, "label": "IgnoredAmbience"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2019-05-29T13:47:03Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-13T06:47:17Z", "closed_at": "2019-06-13T06:30:26Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm looking to import data from XML with a pre-defined schema that maps fairly closely to a relational database.\r\nIn particular, it has explicit annotations for when fields are required, optional, or when a default value should be inferred.\r\n\r\nWould there be value in adding the ability to define `NOT NULL` and `DEFAULT` column constraints to sqlite-utils?", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/24/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 449848803, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4NDg4MDM=", "number": 25, "title": "Allow .insert(..., foreign_keys=()) to auto-detect table and primary key", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-05-29T14:39:22Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-13T05:32:32Z", "closed_at": "2019-06-13T05:32:32Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `foreign_keys=` argument currently takes a list of triples:\r\n```python\r\ndb[\"usages\"].insert_all(\r\n    usages_to_insert,\r\n    foreign_keys=(\r\n        (\"line_id\", \"lines\", \"id\"),\r\n        (\"definition_id\", \"definitions\", \"id\"),\r\n    ),\r\n)\r\n```\r\nAs of #16 we have a mechanism for detecting the primary key column (the third item in this triple) - we should use that here too, so foreign keys can be optionally defined as a list of pairs.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/25/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}