{"id": 816526538, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU4MTY1MjY1Mzg=", "number": 239, "title": "sqlite-utils extract could handle nested objects", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 16, "created_at": "2021-02-25T15:10:28Z", "updated_at": "2022-09-03T23:46:02Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Imagine a table (imported from a nested JSON file) where one of the columns contains values that look like this:\r\n\r\n    {\"email\": \"anonymous@noreply.airtable.com\", \"id\": \"usrROSHARE0000000\", \"name\": \"Anonymous\"}\r\n\r\nThe `sqlite-utils extract` command already uses single text values in a column to populate a new table. It would not be much of a stretch for it to be able to use JSON instead, including specifying which of those values should be used as the primary key in the new table.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/239/reactions\", \"total_count\": 6, \"+1\": 5, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 1, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 816523763, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU4MTY1MjM3NjM=", "number": 238, "title": ".add_foreign_key() corrupts database if column contains a space", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2021-02-25T15:07:20Z", "updated_at": "2021-02-25T16:54:02Z", "closed_at": "2021-02-25T16:54:02Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I ran this:\r\n\r\n    db[\"Reports\"].add_foreign_key(\"Reported by ID\", \"Reporters\", \"id\")\r\n\r\nAnd got this:\r\n\r\n```\r\n~/jupyter-venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py in add_foreign_keys(self, foreign_keys)\r\n    616         # Have to VACUUM outside the transaction to ensure .foreign_keys property\r\n    617         # can see the newly created foreign key.\r\n--> 618         self.vacuum()\r\n    619 \r\n    620     def index_foreign_keys(self):\r\n\r\n~/jupyter-venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py in vacuum(self)\r\n    629 \r\n    630     def vacuum(self):\r\n--> 631         self.execute(\"VACUUM;\")\r\n    632 \r\n    633 \r\n\r\n~/jupyter-venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py in execute(self, sql, parameters)\r\n    234             return self.conn.execute(sql, parameters)\r\n    235         else:\r\n--> 236             return self.conn.execute(sql)\r\n    237 \r\n    238     def executescript(self, sql):\r\n\r\nDatabaseError: database disk image is malformed\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/238/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 816560819, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU4MTY1NjA4MTk=", "number": 240, "title": "table.pks_and_rows_where() method returning primary keys along with the rows", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2021-02-25T15:49:28Z", "updated_at": "2021-02-25T16:39:23Z", "closed_at": "2021-02-25T16:28:23Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "*Original title: Easier way to update a row returned from .rows*\r\n\r\nHere's a surprisingly hard problem I ran into while trying to implement #239 - given a row returned by `db[table].rows` how can you update that row?\r\n\r\nThe problem is that the `db[table].update(...)` method requires a primary key. But if you have a row from the `db[table].rows` iterator it might not even contain the primary key - provided the table is a `rowid` table.\r\n\r\nInstead, currently, you need to introspect the table and, if `rowid` is a primary key, explicitly include that in the `select=`  argument to `table.rows_where(...)` - otherwise it will not be returned.\r\n\r\nA utility mechanism to make this easier would be very welcome.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/240/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 816601354, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTgwMjM1NDI3", "number": 241, "title": "Extract expand - work in progress", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2021-02-25T16:36:38Z", "updated_at": "2021-02-25T16:36:38Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/241", "body": "Refs #239. Still needs documentation and CLI implementation.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/241/reactions\", \"total_count\": 3, \"+1\": 3, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 1, "state_reason": null}