{"id": 1109783030, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJfH2", "number": 1607, "title": "More detailed information about installed SpatiaLite version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-01-20T21:28:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-09T06:42:02Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-09T06:32:28Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/spatialite-sql-5.0.0.html#version has a whole bunch of interesting functions for things like `freexl_version()` and `geos_version()` and `HasMathSQL()` and suchlike.\r\n\r\nThese could be shown on the `/-/versions` page.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1607/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1174717287, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBMNn", "number": 1674, "title": "Tweak design of /.json", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-03-20T22:58:01Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-20T22:58:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://latest.datasette.io/.json\r\n\r\nCurrently:\r\n```json\r\n{\r\n  \"_memory\": {\r\n    \"name\": \"_memory\",\r\n    \"hash\": null,\r\n    \"color\": \"a6c7b9\",\r\n    \"path\": \"/_memory\",\r\n    \"tables_and_views_truncated\": [],\r\n    \"tables_and_views_more\": false,\r\n    \"tables_count\": 0,\r\n    \"table_rows_sum\": 0,\r\n    \"show_table_row_counts\": false,\r\n    \"hidden_table_rows_sum\": 0,\r\n    \"hidden_tables_count\": 0,\r\n    \"views_count\": 0,\r\n    \"private\": false\r\n  },\r\n  \"fixtures\": {\r\n    \"name\": \"fixtures\",\r\n    \"hash\": \"645005884646eb941c89997fbd1c0dd6be517cb1b493df9816ae497c0c5afbaa\",\r\n    \"color\": \"645005\",\r\n    \"path\": \"/fixtures\",\r\n    \"tables_and_views_truncated\": [\r\n      {\r\n        \"name\": \"compound_three_primary_keys\",\r\n        \"columns\": [\r\n          \"pk1\",\r\n          \"pk2\",\r\n          \"pk3\",\r\n          \"content\"\r\n        ],\r\n        \"primary_keys\": [\r\n          \"pk1\",\r\n          \"pk2\",\r\n          \"pk3\"\r\n        ],\r\n        \"count\": 1001,\r\n        \"hidden\": false,\r\n        \"fts_table\": null,\r\n        \"num_relationships_for_sorting\": 0,\r\n        \"private\": false\r\n      },\r\n```\r\nAs-of this issue the `\"path\"` key is confusing, it doesn't match what https://latest.datasette.io/-/databases returns:\r\n\r\n- #1668", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1674/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 626593402, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjY1OTM0MDI=", "number": 780, "title": "Internals documentation for datasette.metadata() method", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-05-28T15:14:22Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-15T20:50:34Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/40885ef24e32d91502b6b8bbad1c7376f50f2830/datasette/app.py#L297-L328", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/780/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1175854982, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFh-G", "number": 1679, "title": "Research: how much overhead does the n=1 time limit have?", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 11, "created_at": "2022-03-21T19:27:46Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-21T21:55:57Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-21T21:55:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1a7750eb29fd15dd2eea3b9f6e33028ce441b143/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L181-L200\r\n\r\n```python\r\n@contextmanager\r\ndef sqlite_timelimit(conn, ms):\r\n    deadline = time.perf_counter() + (ms / 1000)\r\n    # n is the number of SQLite virtual machine instructions that will be\r\n    # executed between each check. It's hard to know what to pick here.\r\n    # After some experimentation, I've decided to go with 1000 by default and\r\n    # 1 for time limits that are less than 50ms\r\n    n = 1000\r\n    if ms < 50:\r\n        n = 1\r\n\r\n    def handler():\r\n        if time.perf_counter() >= deadline:\r\n            return 1\r\n\r\n    conn.set_progress_handler(handler, n)\r\n    try:\r\n        yield\r\n    finally:\r\n        conn.set_progress_handler(None, n)\r\n```\r\nHow often do I set a time limit of 50 or less? How much slower does it go thanks to this code?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1679/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 779691739, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3Nzk2OTE3Mzk=", "number": 1176, "title": "Policy on documenting \"public\" datasette.utils functions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 13, "created_at": "2021-01-05T22:55:25Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-07T06:43:32Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-07T06:42:58Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette-css-properties starts [like this](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-css-properties/blob/0.1/datasette_css_properties/__init__.py#L1-L3):\r\n\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasette import hookimpl\r\nfrom datasette.utils.asgi import Response\r\nfrom datasette.utils import escape_css_string, to_css_class\r\n```\r\n`escape_css_string` and `to_css_class` are not documented, which means relying on them is risky since there's no promise that they won't change.\r\n\r\nWould be good to figure out a policy on this, and maybe promote some of them to \"documented\" status.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1641013220, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5hz9_k", "number": 2045, "title": "First column on a view page has no facet option in cog menu", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2023-03-26T18:02:47Z", "updated_at": "2023-03-26T18:02:48Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "e.g. first column on this page - cog menu has no option to facet.\r\n\r\nhttps://datasette.io/content/tools\r\n\r\n<img width=\"531\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/227795084-1a36bec3-f274-4381-909d-c691317d803b.png\">\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2045/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 456568880, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1Njg4ODA=", "number": 509, "title": "Support opening multiple databases with the same stem", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-06-15T19:32:00Z", "updated_at": "2020-12-22T20:04:35Z", "closed_at": "2020-12-22T20:04:35Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "e.g. I should be able to do this:\r\n\r\n    datasette App/data.db Other_App/data.db\r\n\r\nThis currently errors because you can't have two databases taking the `/data` URL path.\r\n\r\nInstead, how about in this particular case assigning the second database `/data-1`?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/509/reactions\", \"total_count\": 2, \"+1\": 2, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 629535669, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjk1MzU2Njk=", "number": 794, "title": "Show hooks implemented by each plugin on /-/plugins", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-06-02T21:44:38Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-02T22:30:17Z", "closed_at": "2020-06-02T21:50:10Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "e.g.\r\n```json\r\n    {\r\n        \"name\": \"qs_actor.py\",\r\n        \"static\": false,\r\n        \"templates\": false,\r\n        \"version\": null,\r\n        \"hooks\": [\r\n            \"actor_from_request\"\r\n        ]\r\n    }\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/794/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 626078521, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYwNzg1MjE=", "number": 774, "title": "Consolidate request.raw_args and request.args", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2020-05-27T22:30:59Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-29T23:27:35Z", "closed_at": "2020-05-29T23:22:38Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "`request.raw_args` is not documented, and I'd like to remove it entirely.\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/706#issuecomment-634975252_\r\n\r\nI use it in a few places in other projects though, so I'll have to fix those first: https://github.com/search?q=user%3Asimonw+raw_args&type=Code", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/774/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 570301333, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDEzMzM=", "number": 684, "title": "Add documentation on Database introspection methods to internals.rst", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2020-02-25T04:20:24Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-04T18:56:15Z", "closed_at": "2020-05-30T18:40:39Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "`internals.rst` will be landing as part of #683", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/684/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 576722115, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NzY3MjIxMTU=", "number": 696, "title": "Single failing unit test when run inside the Docker image", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-03-06T06:16:36Z", "updated_at": "2021-03-29T17:04:19Z", "closed_at": "2021-03-07T07:41:18Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "```\r\ndocker run -it -v `pwd`:/mnt datasetteproject/datasette:latest /bin/bash\r\nroot@0e1928cfdf79:/# cd /mnt\r\nroot@0e1928cfdf79:/mnt# pip install -e .[test]\r\nroot@0e1928cfdf79:/mnt# pytest\r\n```\r\nI get one failure!\r\n\r\nIt was for `test_searchable[/fixtures/searchable.json?_search=te*+AND+do*&_searchmode=raw-expected_rows3]`\r\n```\r\n    def test_searchable(app_client, path, expected_rows):\r\n        response = app_client.get(path)\r\n>       assert expected_rows == response.json[\"rows\"]\r\nE       AssertionError: assert [[1, 'barry c...sel', 'puma']] == []\r\nE         Left contains 2 more items, first extra item: [1, 'barry cat', 'terry dog', 'panther']\r\nE         Full diff:\r\nE         + []\r\nE         - [[1, 'barry cat', 'terry dog', 'panther'],\r\nE         -  [2, 'terry dog', 'sara weasel', 'puma']]\r\n```\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/695#issuecomment-595614469_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/696/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 668064026, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NjgwNjQwMjY=", "number": 911, "title": "Rethink the --name option to \"datasette publish\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-07-29T18:49:49Z", "updated_at": "2020-07-29T18:49:49Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "`--name` works inconsistently across the different publish providers - on Cloud Run you should use `--service` instead for example. Need to review it across all of them and either remove it or clarify what it does.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/911/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1170144879, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Fvv5v", "number": 1660, "title": "Refactor and simplify Datasette routing and views", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2022-03-15T19:56:56Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-21T19:19:12Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-21T19:19:01Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "While working on:\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1657\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439\n\nIt became very clear that the least maintainable part of Datasette at the moment is the way routing to the database, table and row views work - in particular the subclassing mechanism with BaseView and DataView, but also the complex variety of ways in which the URL routes capture different named regular expression groups.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1660/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1455928469, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx7SV", "number": 1903, "title": "Refactor all error classes into a datasette.exceptions module", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-11-18T22:44:45Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-20T22:35:01Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "While working on this issue:\r\n- #1896\r\n\r\nI realized that Datasette has error classes scattered around a fair bit, including some in the `datasette.utils.asgi` module for some reason.\r\n\r\nI should clean these up.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1903/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1571207083, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5dprer", "number": 2016, "title": "Database metadata fields like description are not available in the index page template's context", "user": {"value": 9993, "label": "palewire"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2023-02-05T02:25:53Z", "updated_at": "2023-02-05T22:56:43Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "When looping through `databases` in the index.html template, I'd like to print the description of each database alongside its name. But it appears that isn't passed in from the view, unless I'm missing it. It would be great to have that.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2016/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1122413719, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5qyX", "number": 1621, "title": "Test against Python 3.11 dev version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-02T21:38:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T21:58:54Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "To avoid another surprise like we got with 3.10: https://simonwillison.net/2021/Oct/9/finding-and-reporting-a-bug/\r\n\r\nFrom a quick GitHub code search it looks like `3.11-dev` should work: https://cs.github.com/urllib3/urllib3/blob/7bec77e81aa0a194c98381053225813f5347c9d2/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L60", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1621/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1108235694, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CDlWu", "number": 1603, "title": "A proper favicon", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 19, "created_at": "2022-01-19T15:24:55Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-20T06:07:31Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tips here: https://adamj.eu/tech/2022/01/18/how-to-add-a-favicon-to-your-django-site/ - I think a PNG served at `/favicon.ico` is the best option, since safari doesn't support SVG yet.\r\n\r\nRelevant code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb29119db9115b1f40de2fb45263ed77e3bfbb3e/datasette/app.py#L182-L183\r\n\r\nI can reuse the icon for https://datasette.io/desktop", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1194790504, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HNw5o", "number": 1701, "title": "Use + for spaces instead of ~20", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-04-06T15:40:48Z", "updated_at": "2022-04-06T15:55:10Z", "closed_at": "2022-04-06T15:55:05Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tilde encoding introduced in #1657 means that database files with spaces in the name - e.g. the Apple Mail `Envelope Index` database - end up with URLs like this:\r\n\r\n    http://127.0.0.1:8001/Envelope~20Index\r\n\r\nI think this would be prettier:\r\n\r\n    http://127.0.0.1:9933/Envelope+Index", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1701/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1161584460, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FPF9M", "number": 1651, "title": "Get rid of the no-longer necessary ?_format=json hack for tables called x.json", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2022-03-07T15:40:42Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:50Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-15T18:25:42Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tidy up from:\r\n- #1439", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1651/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1386854246, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sqbdm", "number": 1822, "title": "Switch to keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-09-26T23:20:38Z", "updated_at": "2022-09-27T00:44:04Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This is a good idea, and one that needs to happen before Datasette 1.0:\r\n\r\n> While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive?\r\n>\r\n> Thinking out loud:\r\n>\r\n> ```\r\n> async def render_template( \r\n>      self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None \r\n> ): \r\n> ```\r\n_Originally posted by @jefftriplett in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1822/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1838469176, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5tlNA4", "number": 2127, "title": "Context base class to support documenting the context", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2023-08-07T00:01:02Z", "updated_at": "2023-08-10T01:30:25Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This idea first came up here:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2112#issuecomment-1652751140\r\n\r\nIf `datasette.render_template(...)` takes an optional `Context` subclass as an alternative to a context dictionary, I could then use dataclasses to define the context made available to specific templates - which then gives me something I can use to help document what they are.\r\n\r\nAlso refs:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1510", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2127/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 732674148, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzI2NzQxNDg=", "number": 1062, "title": "Refactor .csv to be an output renderer - and teach register_output_renderer to stream all rows", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2020-10-29T21:25:02Z", "updated_at": "2022-09-28T14:09:54Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This can drive the upgrade of the `register_output_renderer` hook to be able to handle streaming all rows in a large query.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1062/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 774332247, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTQ1MjY0NDM2", "number": 1159, "title": "Improve the display of facets information", "user": {"value": 552629, "label": "lovasoa"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2020-12-24T11:01:47Z", "updated_at": "2023-07-31T18:57:59Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/1159", "body": "This PR changes the display of facets to hopefully make them more readable.\r\n\r\nBefore | After\r\n---|---\r\n![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/552629/103084609-b1ec2980-45df-11eb-85bc-68ab8df3e8d9.png) | ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/552629/103085220-620e6200-45e1-11eb-8189-5dd5d3e2569e.png)\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1159/reactions\", \"total_count\": 4, \"+1\": 4, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 531755959, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MzE3NTU5NTk=", "number": 647, "title": "Move hashed URL mode out to a plugin", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2019-12-03T06:29:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T11:56:05Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-15T23:13:06Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "They used to be the default until #418. Since making them optional I haven't felt the need to use them even once.\r\n\r\nThat suggests to me that they should be removed. I think their effect could be entirely handled by an ASGI wrapping plugin.\r\n\r\nhttps://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/0.32/performance.html#hashed-url-mode", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/647/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 688622148, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2ODg2MjIxNDg=", "number": 957, "title": "Simplify imports of common classes", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2020-08-29T23:44:04Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-06T06:36:41Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-06T06:34:37Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "There are only a few classes that plugins need to import. It would be nice if these imports were as short and memorable as possible.\r\n\r\nFor example:\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasette.app import Datasette\r\nfrom datasette.utils.asgi import Response\r\n```\r\nCould both become:\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasette import Datasette\r\nfrom datasette import Response\r\n```\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/957/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1054243511, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1nq3", "number": 1509, "title": "Datasette 1.0 JSON API (and documentation)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2021-11-15T23:22:45Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-15T20:38:56Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The new JSON API in a stable, documented form.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1509/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1170554975, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FxUBf", "number": 1663, "title": "Document the internals that were used in datasette-hashed-urls", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-03-16T05:17:08Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:50Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-17T21:32:38Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls used a couple of currently undocumented features:\r\n- `db.hash`\r\n- `Datasette(..., immutables=[...])`", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1663/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1131295060, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU", "number": 1634, "title": "Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-02-11T00:07:26Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-11T17:38:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this:\r\n```Dockerfile\r\nFROM python:3.8\r\nCOPY . /app\r\nWORKDIR /app\r\n\r\nENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2'\r\nRUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql\r\nRUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json\r\nENV PORT 8080\r\nEXPOSE 8080\r\nCMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db\r\n```\r\nThis is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile\r\n\r\nHere's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions\", \"total_count\": 2, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 2, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1898927976, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5xL1do", "number": 2186, "title": "Mechanism for register_output_renderer hooks to access full count", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2023-09-15T18:57:54Z", "updated_at": "2023-09-15T19:27:59Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The cause of this bug:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-export-notebook/issues/17\r\n\r\nIs that `datasette-export-notebook` was consulting `data[\"filtered_table_rows_count\"]` in the render output plugin function in order to show the total number of rows that would be exported.\r\n\r\nThat field is no longer available by default - the `\"count\"` field is only available if `?_extra=count` was passed.\r\n\r\nIt would be useful if plugins like this could access the total count on demand, should they need to.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2186/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 812704869, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU4MTI3MDQ4Njk=", "number": 1237, "title": "?_pretty=1 option for pretty-printing JSON output", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2021-02-20T20:54:40Z", "updated_at": "2021-11-16T18:28:33Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Suggested by @frankieroberto in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-782746755", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1237/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 449854604, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4NTQ2MDQ=", "number": 492, "title": "Facets not correctly persisted in hidden form fields", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-05-29T14:49:39Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-15T20:12:29Z", "closed_at": "2020-09-15T20:12:29Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Steps to reproduce: visit https://2a4b892.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attractions?_facet_m2m=attraction_characteristic and click \"Apply\"\r\n\r\nResult is a 500: `no such column: attraction_characteristic`\r\n\r\nThe error occurs because of this hidden HTML input:\r\n\r\n    <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"_facet\" value=\"attraction_characteristic\">\r\n\r\nThis should be:\r\n\r\n    <input type=\"hidden\" name=\"_facet_m2m\" value=\"attraction_characteristic\">", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/492/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1175715988, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFACU", "number": 1678, "title": "Make `check_visibility()` a documented API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-03-21T17:30:34Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-21T19:04:03Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-21T19:01:46Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Spotted this while working on:\r\n- #1677\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L1005-L1021", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1678/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 443021509, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDMwMjE1MDk=", "number": 461, "title": "Paginate + search for databases/tables on the homepage", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-05-11T18:05:34Z", "updated_at": "2020-12-17T22:14:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split out from #460 - in order to support large numbers of connected databases the homepage needs to be paginated.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1483250004, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YaJlU", "number": 1936, "title": "Fix /db/table/-/upsert in the API explorer", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-08T00:59:34Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-08T01:36:02Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split from:\r\n- #1931\r\n- #1878\r\n\r\nThis is a bit tricky because the code needs to figure out what the primary keys are for an item, and whether or not `rowid` should be included.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1936/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1058072543, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4_EOff", "number": 1518, "title": "Complete refactor of TableView and table.html template", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 45, "created_at": "2021-11-19T02:55:16Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-15T18:35:49Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split from #878. The current `TableView` class is by far the most complex part of Datasette, and the most difficult to work on: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.59.2/datasette/views/table.py\r\n\r\nIn #878 I started exploring a new pattern for building views. In doing so it became clear that `TableView` is the first beast that I need to slay - if I can refactor that into something neat the pattern for building other views will emerge as a natural consequence.\r\n\r\nI've been trying to build this as a `register_routes()` plugin, as originally suggested in #870 - though unfortunately it looks like those plugins can't replace existing Datasette default views at the moment, see #1517. [UPDATE: I was wrong about this, plugins can over-ride default views just fine]\r\n\r\nI also know that I want to have a fully documented template context for `table.html` as a major step on the way to Datasette 1.0, see #1510.\r\n\r\nAll of this adds up to the `TableView` factor being a major project that will unblock a whole flurry of other things - so I'm going to work on that in this separate issue.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1518/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 497171390, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0OTcxNzEzOTA=", "number": 577, "title": "Utility mechanism for plugins to render templates", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2019-09-23T15:30:36Z", "updated_at": "2020-02-04T20:26:20Z", "closed_at": "2020-02-04T20:26:19Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Sometimes a plugin will need to render a template for some custom UI. We need a documented API for doing this, which ensures that everything will work correctly if you extend base.html etc.\r\n\r\nSee also #576. This could be a `.render()` method on the Datasette class, but that feels a bit weird - should that class also take responsibility for rendering?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/577/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 787098345, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcwOTgzNDU=", "number": 1191, "title": "Ability for plugins to collaborate when adding extra HTML to blocks in default templates", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2021-01-15T18:18:51Z", "updated_at": "2023-09-18T06:55:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Sometimes a plugin may want to add content to an existing default template - for example `datasette-search-all` adds a new search box at the top of `index.html`. I also want `datasette-upload-csvs` to add a CTA on the `database.html` page: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-csvs/issues/18\r\n\r\nCurrently plugins can do this by providing a new version of the `index.html` template - but if multiple plugins try to do that only one of them will succeed.\r\n\r\nIt would be better if there were known areas of those templates which plugins could add additional content to, such that multiple plugins can use the same spot.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1191/reactions\", \"total_count\": 4, \"+1\": 4, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1174306154, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5F_n1q", "number": 1668, "title": "Introduce concept of a database `route`, separate from its name", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 20, "created_at": "2022-03-19T16:48:28Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-20T16:43:16Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-20T16:43:16Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Some issues came up in the new `datasette-hashed-urls` plugin relating to the way it renames databases on startup to achieve unique URLs that depend on the database SHA-256 content:\r\n\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/10\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/9\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/8\r\n\r\nAll three of these could be addressed by making the \"path\" concept for a database (the `/foo` bit where it is served) work independently of the database's name, which would be used for default display and also as the alias when configuring cross-database aliases.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1668/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 444746021, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDQ3NDYwMjE=", "number": 468, "title": "Pagination for the database index page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-05-16T04:13:56Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-16T23:20:26Z", "closed_at": "2020-10-16T23:20:22Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Some databases have a LOT of tables. Now that we often calculate table row counts dynamically we could really speed things up by paginating the database index page, e.g. http://fivethirtyeight-datasette.herokuapp.com/fivethirtyeight\r\n\r\nIf we're paginating, having a filter-search-for-table widget (similar to the search-for-database widget I'm planning for the homepage) would make sense.\r\n\r\nRelated: pagination for homepage #461 and Datasette Library #417", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/468/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 585633142, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1ODU2MzMxNDI=", "number": 706, "title": "Documentation for the \"request\" object", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2020-03-22T02:55:50Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-30T13:20:00Z", "closed_at": "2020-05-27T22:31:22Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Since that object is passed to the `extra_template_vars` hooks AND the classes registered by `register_facet_classes` it should be part of the documented interface on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/internals.html\r\n\r\nI could also start passing it to the `register_output_renderer` callback.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/706/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 440134714, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDAxMzQ3MTQ=", "number": 446, "title": "Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2019-05-03T17:00:16Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-02T00:08:54Z", "closed_at": "2020-10-02T00:08:47Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Several plugin hooks now expect plugins to return data in a specific shape -  notably the new output format hook and the custom facet hook.\r\n\r\nThese use Python dictionaries right now but that's quite error prone: it would be good to have a mechanism that supported a more structured format.\r\n\r\nFull list of current hooks is here: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins.html#plugin-hooks", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 529429214, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1Mjk0MjkyMTQ=", "number": 642, "title": "Provide a cookiecutter template for creating new plugins", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2019-11-27T15:46:36Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-20T03:20:33Z", "closed_at": "2020-06-20T03:20:25Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "See this conversation: https://twitter.com/psychemedia/status/1199707352540368896", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/642/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1057996111, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4_D71P", "number": 1517, "title": "Let `register_routes()` over-ride default routes within Datasette", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2021-11-19T00:22:15Z", "updated_at": "2021-11-19T03:20:00Z", "closed_at": "2021-11-19T03:07:27Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "See https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/878#issuecomment-973554024_ - right now `register_routes()` can't replace default Datasette routes.\r\n\r\nIt would be neat if plugins could do this - especially if there was a neat documented way for them to then re-dispatch to the original route code after making some kind of modification.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1517/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 607223136, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MDcyMjMxMzY=", "number": 741, "title": "Replace \"datasette publish --extra-options\" with \"--setting\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2020-04-27T04:29:04Z", "updated_at": "2022-05-12T19:21:16Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "See https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-now/issues/9#issuecomment-618155764 - the `--extra-options` mechanism is in practice just used to set `--config` options in data that you publish, but that means you end up with pretty messy looking commands:\r\n\r\n    datasette publish my.db --extra-options=\"--config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500\"\r\n\r\nA neater design would be to support `--config` as an option for `datasette publish` directly:\r\n\r\n    datasette publish my.db --config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/741/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 570101428, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzc5MTkyMjU4", "number": 683, "title": ".execute_write() and .execute_write_fn() methods on Database", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 14, "created_at": "2020-02-24T19:51:58Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-30T18:40:20Z", "closed_at": "2020-02-25T04:45:08Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/683", "body": "See #682\r\n\r\n- [x] Come up with design for `.execute_write()` and `.execute_write_fn()`\r\n- [x] Build some quick demo plugins to exercise the design\r\n- [x] Write some unit tests\r\n- [x] Write the documentation", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/683/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 629595228, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDI2ODkxNDcx", "number": 796, "title": "New WIP writable canned queries", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2020-06-03T00:08:00Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-03T15:16:52Z", "closed_at": "2020-06-03T15:16:50Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/796", "body": "Refs #698. Replaces #703\r\n\r\nStill todo:\r\n\r\n- [x] Unit tests\r\n- ~~Figure out `.json` mode~~\r\n- [x] Flash message solution\r\n- ~~CSRF protection~~\r\n- [x] Better error message display on errors\r\n- [x] Documentation\r\n- ~~Maybe widgets?~~ I'll do these later", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1168995756, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FrXWs", "number": 1657, "title": "Tilde encoding: use ~ instead of - for dash-encoding", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2022-03-14T22:55:17Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-15T18:25:11Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-15T18:01:58Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Refs #1439", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1657/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 497170355, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0OTcxNzAzNTU=", "number": 576, "title": "Documented internals API for use in plugins", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2019-09-23T15:28:50Z", "updated_at": "2021-01-05T23:12:51Z", "closed_at": "2021-01-05T23:12:37Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Quite a few of the plugin hooks make a `datasette\u201d`instance of the Datasette class available to the plugins, so that they can look up configuration settings and execute database queries.\r\n\r\nThis means it should provide a documented, stable API so that plugin authors can rely on it.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/576/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1175894898, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFrty", "number": 1680, "title": "Consider simplifying permissions for 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-03-21T20:17:29Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-21T20:17:29Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Permission checks right now can express one of three opinions:\r\n\r\n- `False` means \"so not grant this permisson\"\r\n- `True` means \"grant this permission\"\r\n- `None` means \"I have no opinion\"\r\n\r\nBut... there's also a concept of a \"default\" for a given permission check, which might be `False` or `True`.\r\n\r\nI worry this is too complicated. Could this be simplified before 1.0? In particular the default concept.\r\n\r\nSee also:\r\n- #1676 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1680/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1065431383, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gTFX", "number": 1533, "title": "Add `Link: rel=\"alternate\"` header pointing to JSON for a table/query", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2021-11-28T20:43:25Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T07:56:51Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T07:49:33Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Originally explored in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-notebook/issues/2#issuecomment-980789406 - I wanted an efficient way to scan a list of URLs and figure out which if any of those corresponded to Datasette tables, canned queries or SQL output that could be represented as a table on a page.\r\n\r\nIt looks like a neat way to do that is with ` Link:` header like this:\r\n\r\n`Link: http://127.0.0.1:8058/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json; rel=\"alternate\"; type=\"application/datasette+json\"`\r\n\r\nI can put a `<link href=...` in the page header too.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1533/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 636511683, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MzY1MTE2ODM=", "number": 830, "title": "Redesign register_facet_classes plugin hook", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-06-10T20:03:27Z", "updated_at": "2021-12-16T19:58:22Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Nothing uses this plugin hook yet, so the design is not yet proven.\r\n\r\nI'm going to build a real plugin against it and use that process to inform any design changes that may need to be made.\r\n\r\nI'll add a warning about this to the documentation.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/830/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 642297505, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTc1MDU=", "number": 857, "title": "Comprehensive documentation for variables made available to templates", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-06-20T03:19:43Z", "updated_at": "2022-10-26T02:58:17Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-26T02:58:17Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Needed for the Datasette 1.0 release, so template authors can trust that Datasette is unlikely to break their templates.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/857/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 459587155, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkwODk3MTA0", "number": 518, "title": "Port Datasette from Sanic to ASGI + Uvicorn", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2019-06-23T15:18:42Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-24T13:42:50Z", "closed_at": "2019-06-24T03:13:09Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/518", "body": "Most of the code here was fleshed out in comments on #272 (Port Datasette to ASGI) - this pull request will track the final pieces:\r\n\r\n- [x] Update test harness to more correctly simulate the `raw_path` issue\r\n- [x] Use `raw_path` so table names containing `/` can work correctly\r\n- [x] Bug: JSON not served with correct content-type\r\n- [x] Get ?_trace=1 working again\r\n- [x] Replacement for `@app.listener(\"before_server_start\")`\r\n- [x] Bug: `/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv?_format=json` downloads as CSV\r\n- [x] Replace Sanic request and response objects with my own classes, so I can remove Sanic dependency\r\n- [x] Final code tidy-up before merging to master", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/518/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1170355774, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FwjY-", "number": 1661, "title": "Remove Hashed URL mode", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2022-03-15T23:13:56Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T00:37:37Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-19T00:37:36Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It's now handled by a plugin instead:\r\n- #647\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/3\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls\r\n\r\nSub-tasks:\r\n\r\n- [x] Remove hashed URL mode implementation\r\n- [x] Update documentation\r\n- [x] Ensure `--setting hash_urls 1` shows a useful message", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1661/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 764059235, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3NjQwNTkyMzU=", "number": 1143, "title": "More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices", "user": {"value": 114388, "label": "yurivish"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2020-12-12T17:06:35Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-13T17:41:17Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "It would be nice if the `--cors` option accepted an origin regex to more securely allow secure local development.\r\n\r\nAs an example, Observable notebooks namespace every user's notebooks by their username and user content is served from username.observableusercontent.com, so you would set `--cors-origin username.observableusercontent.com` to restrict access to a local development Datasette instance to only your own notebooks, rather than exposing the data to any website that makes a request.\r\n\r\nThank you for all of your work on Datasette!", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 449886319, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4ODYzMTk=", "number": 493, "title": "Rename metadata.json to config.json", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2019-05-29T15:48:03Z", "updated_at": "2023-08-23T01:29:21Z", "closed_at": "2023-08-23T01:29:20Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It is increasingly being useful configuration options, when it started out as purely metadata.\r\n\r\nCould cause confusion with the `--config` mechanism though - maybe that should be called \"settings\" instead?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 957310278, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTAyNzg=", "number": 1409, "title": "`default_allow_sql` setting (a re-imagining of the old `allow_sql` setting)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2021-07-31T19:48:56Z", "updated_at": "2023-01-07T18:06:01Z", "closed_at": "2023-01-05T00:51:31Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "In 49d6d2f7b0f6cb02e25022e1c9403811f1fa0a7c as part of #813 I removed the `allow_sql` setting - on the basis that users could disable the ability to execute custom SQL queries using the new permission system instead.\r\n\r\nI don't think this was the right decision. Disabling custom SQL is an important security capability, and explaining how to do it using permissions is significantly  more complex than letting people know they can add `--setting allow_sql off`.\r\n\r\nSo I want to bring that setting back - maybe with a different, better name - and have it modify the default for that option if the permissions system doesn't have an opinion.\r\n\r\nThat way people can still use the setting but then use permissions to allow specific signed-in users access to execute SQL.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1409/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 730210880, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzAyMTA4ODA=", "number": 1055, "title": "query.html and table.html should share the same table implementation", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-10-27T07:58:21Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-27T07:58:29Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "In #998 I made a change that affected the table page but didn't affect the query page because I incorrectly assumed they shared rendering logic.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1055/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 570309546, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDk1NDY=", "number": 685, "title": "Document (and reconsider design of) Database.execute() and Database.execute_against_connection_in_thread()", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 15, "created_at": "2020-02-25T04:49:44Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-30T13:20:50Z", "closed_at": "2020-05-08T17:42:18Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "In #683 I started a new section of internals documentation covering the `Database` class: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/internals.html#database-class\r\n\r\nI decided not to document `.execute()` and `.execute_against_connection_in_thread()` yet because I'm not 100% happy with their API design yet.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/685/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1479920517, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YNcuF", "number": 1934, "title": "Return number of ignored/replaced items from /-/insert", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-12-06T19:01:58Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-06T19:02:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Idea from here:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1934/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1487738738, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy", "number": 1942, "title": "Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-10T01:08:53Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-10T01:11:30Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say \"I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page\"?\r\n\r\n`datasette-cluster-map` already needs this - the first thing it does when the page loads is `fetch()` a JSON representation of that same data.\r\n\r\nThis idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too.\r\n\r\nRefs:\r\n- #1711", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 1, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 398011658, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzOTgwMTE2NTg=", "number": 398, "title": "Ensure downloading a 100+MB SQLite database file works", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-01-10T20:57:52Z", "updated_at": "2020-12-05T19:36:27Z", "closed_at": "2020-12-05T19:36:27Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I've seen attempted downloads of large files fail after about ten seconds.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/398/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 542553350, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NDI1NTMzNTA=", "number": 655, "title": "Copy and paste doesn't work reliably on iPhone for SQL editor", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-12-26T13:15:10Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-30T20:36:12Z", "closed_at": "2020-08-30T17:51:40Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm having a lot of trouble copying and pasting from the codemirror editor on my iPhone.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/655/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 639072811, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MzkwNzI4MTE=", "number": 849, "title": "Rename master branch to main", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2020-06-15T19:05:54Z", "updated_at": "2022-10-27T13:57:08Z", "closed_at": "2020-09-15T20:37:14Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I was waiting for consensus to form around this (and kind-of hoping for `trunk` since I like the tree metaphor) and it looks like `main` is it.\r\n\r\nI've seen convincing arguments against `trunk` too - it indicates that the branch has some special significance like in Subversion (where all branches come from trunk) when it doesn't. So `main` is better anyway.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/849/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 769520939, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3Njk1MjA5Mzk=", "number": 1149, "title": "Make it easier to theme Datasette with CSS", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-12-17T05:01:26Z", "updated_at": "2021-03-22T21:43:16Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I want to theme https://datasette.io/ so that when you visit https://datasette.io/content (the Datasette UI part of it) the navigation from the parent site is used.\r\n\r\nI tried dropping in a `base.html` template like this:\r\n\r\n```html\r\n{% extends \"page_base.html\" %}\r\n\r\n{% block base_extra_head %}\r\n\r\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no\">\r\n{% for url in extra_css_urls %}\r\n    <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{ url.url }}\"{% if url.sri %} integrity=\"{{ url.sri }}\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"{% endif %}>\r\n{% endfor %}\r\n{% for url in extra_js_urls %}\r\n    <script src=\"{{ url.url }}\"{% if url.sri %} integrity=\"{{ url.sri }}\" crossorigin=\"anonymous\"{% endif %}></script>\r\n{% endfor %}\r\n{% block extra_head %}{% endblock %}\r\n{% endblock %}\r\n\r\n{% block extra_body_end %}\r\n{% include \"_close_open_menus.html\" %}\r\n\r\n{% for body_script in body_scripts %}\r\n    <script>{{ body_script }}</script>\r\n{% endfor %}\r\n{% endblock %}\r\n```\r\nBut this resulted in pages looking like this:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1067\" alt=\"content__categories__3_rows\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/102446045-c168e280-3fe1-11eb-94d6-e7350798eb96.png\">\r\n\r\nNote that the cog menu is broken and the filter UI is unstyled. To get these working correctly I would need to copy over a whole lot of Datasette's default CSS - and that means that when Datasette changes in the future those pages could break in subtle ways.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1149/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 770436876, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3NzA0MzY4NzY=", "number": 1150, "title": "Maintain an in-memory SQLite table of connected databases and their tables", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 32, "created_at": "2020-12-17T23:02:13Z", "updated_at": "2020-12-27T14:51:39Z", "closed_at": "2020-12-18T22:34:12Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I want Datasette to have its own internal metadata about connected tables, to power features like a paginated searchable homepage in #461. I want this to be a SQLite table.\r\n\r\nThis could also be part of the directory scanning mechanism prototyped in #672 - where Datasette can be set to continually scan a directory for new database files that it can serve.\r\n\r\nAlso relevant to the Datasette Library concept in #417.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1150/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1087181951, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5AzRR_", "number": 1576, "title": "Traces should include SQL executed by subtasks created with `asyncio.gather`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2021-12-22T20:52:02Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-05T05:21:35Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-05T05:19:53Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I tried running some parallel SQL queries using `asyncio.gather()` but the SQL that was executed didn't show up in the trace rendered by https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-pretty-traces\r\n\r\nI realized that was because traces are keyed against the current task ID, which changes when a sub-task is run using `asyncio.gather` or similar.\r\n\r\nThe faceting and suggest faceting queries are missing from this trace:\r\n\r\n![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/147153855-2d611f07-922a-4d18-9e6e-4be89e010dc4.png)\r\n\r\n> The reason they aren't showing up in the traces is that traces are stored just for the currently executing `asyncio` task ID: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ace86566b28280091b3844cf5fbecd20158e9004/datasette/tracer.py#L13-L25\r\n>\r\n> This is so traces for other incoming requests don't end up mixed together. But there's no current mechanism to track async tasks that are effectively \"child tasks\" of the current request, and hence should be tracked the same.\r\n>\r\n> https://stackoverflow.com/a/69349501/6083 suggests that you pass the task ID as an argument to the child tasks that are executed using `asyncio.gather()` to work around this kind of problem.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1518#issuecomment-999870993_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1576/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1823393475, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5srsbD", "number": 2119, "title": "database color shows only on index page, not other pages", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2023-07-27T00:19:39Z", "updated_at": "2023-08-11T05:25:45Z", "closed_at": "2023-08-11T05:16:24Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I think this has been a bug for a long time.\r\n\r\nhttps://latest.datasette.io/ currently shows:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"827\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/assets/9599/fcd08d0c-5b07-40be-bc9f-3ba9199ad858\">\r\n\r\nThose colors are based on a hash of the database name. But when you click through to https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures\r\n\r\n<img width=\"692\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/assets/9599/7c9dfd66-06e8-47fc-9ed7-ce425da22cb4\">\r\n\r\nIt's red on all sub-pages too.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2119/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1065429936, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gSuw", "number": 1532, "title": "Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2021-11-28T20:37:18Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-16T20:13:34Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I realized that one of the reasons I'm having trouble committing to nailing down the JSON API for 1.0 is that I don't use it much myself - I use the `?_shape=array` one quite often, but I don't have any projects that are using the default, more fully-featured API.\r\n\r\nAs an experiment I built a Web Component for embedding Datasette tables on pages - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-table - and I think it's actually going to be a really useful tool for helping me dog food the v1.0 API design.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1174162781, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5F_E1d", "number": 1666, "title": "Refactor URL routing to enable testing", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-03-19T03:52:29Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T16:32:03Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-19T16:32:03Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I ran into some bugs earlier with URL routing - having more robust testing around this (especially since they are defined using regular expressions) would be really useful.\r\n\r\n- A utility function that resolves a path against a list of reflexes and returns the match\r\n- Make the routes and regular expressions available from a private Datasette method\r\n- Add tests that exercise them\r\n\r\nRelated:\r\n- #1660", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1666/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1054246919, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1ogH", "number": 1511, "title": "Review plugin hooks for Datasette 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2021-11-15T23:26:05Z", "updated_at": "2021-11-16T01:20:14Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I need to perform a detailed review of the plugin interface - especially the plugin hooks like [register_facet_classes()](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#register-facet-classes) which I don't yet have complete confidence in.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1511/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1558644003, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5c5wUj", "number": 2006, "title": "Teach `datasette publish` to pin to `datasette<1.0` in a 0.x release", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2023-01-26T19:17:40Z", "updated_at": "2023-01-26T19:20:53Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I just realized that when I ship Datasette 1.0 there may be automated deployments out there which could deploy the 1.0 version by accident, potentially breaking any customizations that aren't compatible with the 1.0 changes.\r\n\r\nI can hopefully help avoid that by shipping one last entry in the `0.x` series that ensures `datasette publish` pins to `<1.0` when it installs Datasette itself.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2006/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1189113609, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5G4G8J", "number": 1697, "title": "`Request.fake(..., url_vars={})`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-04-01T01:48:40Z", "updated_at": "2022-04-01T02:02:18Z", "closed_at": "2022-04-01T02:02:10Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I just created an alternative `.fake()` method because I wanted to fake the `url_vars` captured in the route as well:\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasette.utils.asgi import Request\r\nclass Request(Request):\r\n\r\n    @classmethod\r\n    def fake(cls, path_with_query_string, method=\"GET\", scheme=\"http\", url_vars=None):\r\n        \"\"\"Useful for constructing Request objects for tests\"\"\"\r\n        path, _, query_string = path_with_query_string.partition(\"?\")\r\n        scope = {\r\n            \"http_version\": \"1.1\",\r\n            \"method\": method,\r\n            \"path\": path,\r\n            \"raw_path\": path_with_query_string.encode(\"latin-1\"),\r\n            \"query_string\": query_string.encode(\"latin-1\"),\r\n            \"scheme\": scheme,\r\n            \"type\": \"http\",\r\n        }\r\n        if url_vars:\r\n            scope[\"url_route\"] = {\r\n                \"kwargs\": url_vars\r\n            }\r\n        return cls(scope, None)\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1697/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1840417903, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsoxv", "number": 2131, "title": "Refactor code that supports templates_considered comment", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2023-08-08T01:28:36Z", "updated_at": "2023-08-09T15:27:41Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I ended up duplicating it here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7532feb424b1dce614351e21b2265c04f9669fe2/datasette/views/database.py#L164-L167\r\n\r\nI think it should move to `datasette.render_template()` - and maybe have a renamed template variable too.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2131/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 440222719, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDAyMjI3MTk=", "number": 448, "title": "_facet_array should work against views", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2019-05-03T21:08:04Z", "updated_at": "2021-11-16T01:32:05Z", "closed_at": "2021-11-16T01:19:40Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I created this view: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads-8dbda00/ads_with_targets\r\n\r\n```\r\nCREATE VIEW ads_with_targets as select ads.*, json_group_array(targets.name) as target_names from ads\r\n  join ad_targets on ad_targets.ad_id = ads.id\r\n  join targets on ad_targets.target_id = targets.id\r\n  group by ad_targets.ad_id\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhen I try to apply faceting by array it appears to work at first: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads/ads_with_targets?_facet_array=target_names\r\n\r\nBut actually it's doing the wrong thing - the SQL for the facets uses rowid, but rowid is not present on views at all! These results are incorrect, and clicking to select a facet will fail to produce any rows: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads/ads_with_targets?_facet_array=target_names&target_names__arraycontains=people_who_match%3Ainterests%3AAfrican-American+Civil+Rights+Movement+%281954%E2%80%9468%29\r\n\r\nHere's the SQL it should be using when you select a facet (note that it does not use a rowid):\r\n\r\nhttps://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads?sql=select+*+from+ads_with_targets+where+id+in+%28%0D%0A++++++++++++select+ads_with_targets.id+from+ads_with_targets%2C+json_each%28ads_with_targets.target_names%29+j%0D%0A++++++++++++where+j.value+%3D+%3Ap0%0D%0A++++++++%29+limit+101&p0=people_who_match%3Ainterests%3ABlack+%28Color%29\r\n\r\nSo we need to do something a lot smarter here. I'm not sure what the fix will look like, or even if it's feasible given that views don't have a rowid to hook into so the JSON faceting SQL may have to be completely rewritten.\r\n\r\n```\r\ndatasette publish cloudrun \\\r\n    russian-ads.db \\\r\n    --name json-view-facet-bug-demo \\\r\n    --branch master \\\r\n    --extra-options \"--config sql_time_limit_ms:5000 --config facet_time_limit_ms:5000\"\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/448/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 750089847, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3NTAwODk4NDc=", "number": 1109, "title": "Deprecate --config in Datasette 1.0 (in favour of --setting)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-11-24T21:43:57Z", "updated_at": "2020-12-17T22:07:49Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I added a deprecation warning to this in #992.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1109/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1615692818, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5gTYQS", "number": 2035, "title": "Potential feature: special support for `?a=1&a=2` on the query page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 14, "created_at": "2023-03-08T18:05:03Z", "updated_at": "2023-03-31T16:09:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "From a discussion on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/996877076982415491/1082789517062320138\r\n\r\nThe key idea is to make it easier for people to implement `where id in (...)` that's populated from query string arguments.\r\n\r\nWhat if you could add `?id=11&id=32&id=62` to the URL and have that made available as a list that can be used in the query?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2035/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 793027837, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3OTMwMjc4Mzc=", "number": 1205, "title": "Rename /:memory: to /_memory", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2021-01-25T05:04:56Z", "updated_at": "2021-01-28T22:55:02Z", "closed_at": "2021-01-28T22:51:42Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "For consistency with `/_internal` - and because then we don't need to escape the `:` characters.\r\n\r\nThis change would need to be in before Datasette 1.0. I could land it earlier and set up redirects from the old URLs though.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1205/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1125576543, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DFu9f", "number": 1630, "title": "Review datasette.utils and decide which functions should be documented for 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-07T06:39:52Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-07T06:39:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Follows:\r\n- #1176", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1630/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1121618041, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C2oh5", "number": 1620, "title": "Link: rel=\"alternate\" to JSON for queries too", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-02-02T08:02:42Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T21:53:02Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T21:33:00Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Following:\r\n- #1533\r\n\r\nI implemented it for tables and rows but I should have done queries as well.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1620/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1175694248, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE6uo", "number": 1677, "title": "Remove `check_permission()` from `BaseView`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-03-21T17:18:18Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-21T18:45:04Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-21T18:45:03Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Follow-on from:\r\n- #1675\r\n\r\nRefs:\r\n- #1660", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1677/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1054244712, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1n9o", "number": 1510, "title": "Datasette 1.0 documented template context (maybe via API docs)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2021-11-15T23:23:58Z", "updated_at": "2023-06-28T02:05:21Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Documented context plus protective unit tests. Goal is that custom templates built for 1.x will not break without a 2.x release.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1510/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 531502365, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MzE1MDIzNjU=", "number": 646, "title": "Make database level information from metadata.json available in the index.html template", "user": {"value": 18017473, "label": "lagolucas"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-12-02T19:55:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-15T20:50:34Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Did a search on the issues here and didn't find anything related to what I want.\r\n\r\nI want to have information that is on the database level of the JSON like title, source and source_url, and use it on the index page.\r\n\r\nI tried some small tweaks on the python and html files, but failed to get that result.\r\n\r\nIs there a way? Thanks!", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/646/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 678760988, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2Nzg3NjA5ODg=", "number": 932, "title": "End-user documentation", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2020-08-13T22:04:39Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-08T15:20:48Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette's documentation is aimed at people who install and configure it.\r\n\r\nWhat about end users of preconfigured and deployed Datasette instances?\r\n\r\nSomething that can be linked to from the Datasette UI would be really useful.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/932/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 323658641, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NTg2NDE=", "number": 262, "title": "Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 27, "created_at": "2018-05-16T14:55:42Z", "updated_at": "2023-03-29T06:22:22Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette views currently work by creating a set of data that should be returned as JSON, then defining an additional, optional `template_data()` function which is called if the view is being rendered as HTML.\r\n\r\nThis `template_data()` function calculates extra template context variables which are necessary for the HTML view but should not be included in the JSON.\r\n\r\nExample of how that is used today: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/2b79f2bdeb1efa86e0756e741292d625f91cb93d/datasette/views/table.py#L672-L704\r\n\r\nWith features like Facets in #255 I'm beginning to want to move more items into the `template_data()` - in the case of facets it's the `suggested_facets` array. This saves that feature from being calculated (involving several SQL queries) for the JSON case where it is unlikely to be used.\r\n\r\nBut... as an API user, I want to still optionally be able to access that information.\r\n\r\nSolution: Add a `?_extra=suggested_facets&_extra=table_metadata` argument which can be used to optionally request additional blocks to be added to the JSON API.\r\n\r\nThen redefine as many of the current `template_data()` features as extra arguments instead, and teach Datasette to return certain extras by default when rendering templates.\r\n\r\nThis could allow the JSON representation to be slimmed down further (removing e.g. the `table_definition` and `view_definition` keys) while still making that information available to API users who need it.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 324188953, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjQxODg5NTM=", "number": 272, "title": "Port Datasette to ASGI", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 42, "created_at": "2018-05-17T21:16:32Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-24T04:54:15Z", "closed_at": "2019-06-24T03:33:06Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette doesn't take much advantage of Sanic, and I'm increasingly having to work around parts of it because of idiosyncrasies that are specific to Datasette - caring about the exact order of querystring arguments for example.\r\n\r\nSince Datasette is GET-only our needs from a web framework are actually pretty slim.\r\n\r\nThis becomes more important as I expand the plugins #14 framework. Am I sure I want the plugin ecosystem to depend on a Sanic if I might move away from it in the future?\r\n\r\nIf Datasette wasn't all about async/await I would use WSGI, but today it makes more sense to use ASGI. I'd like to be confident that switching to ASGI would still give me the excellent performance that Sanic provides.\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/django/asgiref/blob/master/specs/asgi.rst", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/272/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1563264257, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5dLYUB", "number": 2010, "title": "Row page should default to card view", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2023-01-30T21:49:37Z", "updated_at": "2023-01-30T21:52:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette currently uses the same table layout on the row pages as it does on the table pages:\r\n\r\nhttps://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages?_sort=name&name__exact=datasette-column-inspect\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1068\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602793-b15dad48-c3e9-4f34-9875-3e79b7aa586d.png\">\r\n\r\nhttps://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages/datasette-column-inspect\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1068\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602883-9d714eec-3908-493e-93d0-c788af47ba21.png\">\r\n\r\nIf you shrink down to mobile width you get this instead, on both of those pages:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"613\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602964-b95aa089-0269-4647-beae-66fffad332f5.png\">\r\n\r\nI think that view, which I think of as the \"card view\", is plain better if you're looking at just a single row - and it (or a variant of it) should be the default presentation on the row page.\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2010/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 973139047, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU5NzMxMzkwNDc=", "number": 1439, "title": "Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 48, "created_at": "2021-08-17T23:32:51Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-15T20:51:26Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-15T20:51:26Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette currently has surprising special behaviour for if a table name ends in `.csv` - which can happen when a tool like `csvs-to-sqlite` creates tables that match the filename that they were imported from.\r\n\r\nhttps://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv illustrates this behaviour: it links to `.csv` and `.json` that look like this:\r\n\r\n- https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv?_format=json\r\n- https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv?_format=csv&_size=max\r\n\r\nWhere normally Datasette would add the `.csv` or `.json` extension to the path component of the URL (as seen on other pages such as https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facet_cities) here the [path_with_format() function](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/adb5b70de5cec3c3dd37184defe606a082c232cf/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L710) notices that there is already a `.` in the path and instead adds `?_format=csv` to the query string instead.\r\n\r\nThe problem with this mechanism is that it's pretty surprising. Anyone writing external code to Datasette who wants to get back the `.csv` or `.json` version giving the URL to a table page will need to know about and implement this behaviour themselves. That's likely to cause all kinds of bugs in the future.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 459590021, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk1OTAwMjE=", "number": 519, "title": "Decide what goes into Datasette 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-06-23T15:47:41Z", "updated_at": "2021-11-15T23:26:11Z", "closed_at": "2021-11-15T23:26:11Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette ASGI #272 is a big part of it... but 1.0 will generally be an indicator that Datasette is a stable platform for developers to write plugins and custom templates against. So lots to think about.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/519/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 734777631, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzQ3Nzc2MzE=", "number": 1080, "title": "\"View all\" option for facets, to provide a (paginated) list of ALL of the facet counts plus a link to view them", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2020-11-02T19:55:06Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-04T06:25:18Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Can use `/database/-/...` namespace from #296", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1080/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 648435885, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDg0MzU4ODU=", "number": 878, "title": "New pattern for views that return either JSON or HTML, available for plugins", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 26, "created_at": "2020-06-30T19:26:13Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T16:19:30Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Can be part of #870 - refactoring existing views to use `register_routes()`.\r\n\r\n> I'm going to put the new `check_permissions()` method on `BaseView` as well. If I want that method to be available to plugins I can do so by turning that `BaseView` class into a documented API that plugins are encouraged to use themselves.\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651995453_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/878/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1122416919, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5rkX", "number": 1623, "title": "/-/patterns returns link: alternate JSON header to 404", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-02-02T21:42:49Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T21:48:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Bug from:\r\n- #1620\r\n\r\n```\r\n% curl -s -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns' | grep link\r\nlink: https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns.json; rel=\"alternate\"; type=\"application/json+datasette\"\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1623/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 374953006, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzNzQ5NTMwMDY=", "number": 369, "title": "Interface should show same JSON shape options for custom SQL queries", "user": {"value": 416374, "label": "gfrmin"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2018-10-29T10:39:15Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-30T17:24:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "At the moment the page returning a custom SQL query shows the JSON and CSV APIs, but not the multiple JSON shapes. However, adding the `_shape` parameter to the JSON API URL manually still works, so perhaps there should be consistency in the interface by having the same \"Advanced Export\" box for custom SQL queries.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/369/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1197925865, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZuXp", "number": 1704, "title": "File PRs against incompatible plugins pinning to datasette<1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-04-08T23:15:30Z", "updated_at": "2022-04-08T23:15:30Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "As part of the preparation for the 1.0 release, test all existing known plugins against the alpha.\r\n\r\nFor any that break, submit a PR suggesting they pin to a version <1.0 - and include a link to the documentation on how to upgrade the plugin for 1.0.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1704/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1840324765, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsSCd", "number": 2129, "title": "CSV ?sql= should indicate errors", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2023-08-07T23:13:04Z", "updated_at": "2023-08-08T02:02:21Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> https://latest.datasette.io/_memory.csv?sql=select+blah is a blank page right now:\r\n\r\n```bash\r\ncurl -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/_memory.csv?sql=select+blah'\r\n```\r\n```\r\nHTTP/2 200 \r\naccess-control-allow-origin: *\r\naccess-control-allow-headers: Authorization, Content-Type\r\naccess-control-expose-headers: Link\r\naccess-control-allow-methods: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS\r\naccess-control-max-age: 3600\r\ncontent-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r\nx-databases: _memory, _internal, fixtures, fixtures2, extra_database, ephemeral\r\ndate: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 23:12:15 GMT\r\nserver: Google Frontend\r\n```\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2118#issuecomment-1668688947_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2129/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1126604194, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DJp2i", "number": 1632, "title": "datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2022-02-07T23:14:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-07T23:50:01Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> ```\r\n> % mkdir /tmp/data\r\n> % cp ~/Dropbox/Development/datasette/fixtures.db /tmp/data \r\n> % datasette /tmp/data/*.db /tmp/data/created.db --create -p 8852\r\n> ...\r\n> INFO:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8852 (Press CTRL+C to quit)\r\n> ^CINFO:     Shutting down\r\n> % datasette /tmp/data/*.db /tmp/data/created.db --create -p 8852\r\n> ...\r\n> INFO:     127.0.0.1:49533 - \"GET / HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\r\n> ```\r\n> The first time I ran Datasette I got two databases - `fixtures` and `created`\r\n> \r\n> BUT... when I ran Datasette the second time it looked like this:\r\n> \r\n> <img width=\"697\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/152887735-5e2b4f21-001d-4e7a-a23a-16a32fdcf554.png\">\r\n> \r\n> This is the same result you get if you run:\r\n> \r\n>     datasette /tmp/data/fixtures.db /tmp/data/created.db /tmp/data/created.db\r\n> \r\n> This is caused by this Datasette issue:\r\n> - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/509\r\n> \r\n> So... either I teach Datasette to de-duplicate multiple identical file paths passed to the command, or I can't use `/data/*.db` in the `Dockerfile` here and I need to go back to other solutions for the challenge described in this comment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/pull/12#issuecomment-1031971831\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/pull/12#issuecomment-1032029874_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1940346034, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5zp1Sy", "number": 2199, "title": "Detailed upgrade instructions for metadata.yaml -> datasette.yaml", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2023-10-12T16:21:25Z", "updated_at": "2023-10-12T22:08:42Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> `Exception: Datasette no longer accepts plugin configuration in --metadata. Move your \"plugins\" configuration blocks to a separate file - we suggest calling that datasette..json - and start Datasette with datasette -c datasette..json. See https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/configuration.html for more details.`\r\n>\r\n> I think we should link directly to documentation that tells people how to perform this upgrade.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2190#issuecomment-1759947021_\r\n            ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2199/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 780153562, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3ODAxNTM1NjI=", "number": 1177, "title": "Ability to stream all rows as newline-delimited JSON", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2021-01-06T07:10:48Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-21T15:08:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Yet another use-case for this: I want to be able to stream newline-delimited JSON in order to better import into Pandas:\r\n> \r\n>     pandas.read_json(\"https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json?_shape=array&_nl=on\", lines=True)\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-755128038_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1177/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1175690070, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW", "number": 1676, "title": "Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing?", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-03-21T17:14:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-02T01:23:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions\r\n>\r\n>> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted.\r\n>> \r\n>> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`:\r\n>\r\n> That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1456013930, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyQJq", "number": 1906, "title": "Extract publish Heroku support to a plugin", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-19T00:02:51Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-19T00:03:10Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> This is a strong argument for extracting the Heroku support out to a plugin - it would allow this to be fixed with a plugin release without needing to push a full release of Datasette itself.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1905#issuecomment-1320678715_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1906/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}