{"id": 1495821607, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZKG0n", "number": 1953, "title": "Release notes for Datasette 1.0a2", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-14T06:26:40Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-15T02:02:15Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-15T02:01:08Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/milestone/27?closed=1\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a1...9ad76d279e2c3874ca5070626a25458ce129f126", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1953/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1473411197, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5X0nh9", "number": 1927, "title": "ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-12-02T20:32:30Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-15T01:47:01Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-08T01:43:01Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "See also:\r\n- #1924\r\n\r\nIt turns out I want to be able to call `/db/-/create` multiple times with the `rows` argument, so that I don't have to worry about creating the table first.\r\n\r\nAs such I find myself wanting support for the `\"insert\": true` and `\"replace\": true` options as well.\r\n\r\nStill TODO:\r\n\r\n- [x] A test for the case where you call `/-/create` twice with `rows` without using these options\r\n- [x] `pk` should be required if you are using these options\r\n- [x] Error if you pass `pk` and the table exists already but has a different `pk`\r\n- [x] Documentation for `insert` and `replace` - and what happens if you repeat a `/-/create` with rows generally\r\n- [x] Documentation should explain that you are allowed to call `/-/create` more than once using `rows`.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1493471221, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZBI_1", "number": 1949, "title": "`.json` errors should be returned as JSON", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2022-12-13T06:14:12Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-15T00:46:27Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Eg the error in this issue:\r\n- #1945 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1949/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1490576818, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Y2GWy", "number": 1943, "title": "`/-/permissions` should list available permissions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-11T23:38:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-15T00:41:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Idea: a `/-/permissions` introspection endpoint for listing registered permissions\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1345691103_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1943/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1497577017, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZQzY5", "number": 1957, "title": "Reconsider row value truncation on query page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-14T23:49:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T23:50:50Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Consider this example: https://ripgrep.datasette.io/repos?sql=select+json_group_array%28full_name%29+from+repos\r\n\r\n```sql\r\nselect json_group_array(full_name) from repos\r\n```\r\n\r\n![CleanShot 2022-12-14 at 15 48 32@2x](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/207739709-8177f683-f938-49a1-8225-42791fad88fe.png)\r\n\r\nMy intention here was to get a string of JSON I can copy and paste elsewhere - see: https://til.simonwillison.net/sqlite/compare-before-after-json\r\n\r\nThe truncation isn't helping here.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1957/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 855296937, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU4NTUyOTY5Mzc=", "number": 1295, "title": "Errors should have links to further information", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2021-04-11T12:39:12Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T23:28:49Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Inspired by this tweet:\r\nhttps://twitter.com/willmcgugan/status/1381186384510255104\r\n\r\n> While I am thinking about faqs. I\u2019d also like to add short URLs to Rich exceptions.\r\n>\r\n> I loath cryptic error messages, and I\u2019ve created a fair few myself. In Rich I\u2019ve tried to make them as plain English as possible. But...\r\n>\r\n>  would be great if every error message linked to a page that explains the error in detail and offers fixes.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1295/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1483320357, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Yaawl", "number": 1937, "title": "/db/-/create API should require insert-rows permission to use row: or rows: option", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-08T01:33:09Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T20:21:26Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-14T20:21:26Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Otherwise someone with `create-table` but no` insert-rows` permission could abuse it to insert data.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1937/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1497288666, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZPs_a", "number": 1956, "title": "Handle abbreviations properly in permission_allowed_actor_restrictions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-14T19:54:21Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T20:04:29Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-14T20:04:28Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This code currently assumes abbreviations are:\r\n\r\n ```pyton\r\naction_initials = \"\".join([word[0] for word in action.split(\"-\")])\r\n```\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1a3dcf494376e32f7cff110c86a88e5b0a3f3924/datasette/default_permissions.py#L182-L208\r\n\r\nThat's no longer correct, they are now registered by the new plugin hook:\r\n- #1939 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1956/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1495716243, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZJtGT", "number": 1952, "title": "Improvements to /-/create-token restrictions interface", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-14T05:22:39Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T05:23:13Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> It would be neat not to show write permissions against immutable databases too - and not hard from a performance perspective since it doesn't involve hundreds more permission checks.\r\n>\r\n> That will need permissions to grow a flag for if they need a mutable database though, which is a bigger job.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1947#issuecomment-1350414402_\r\n\r\nAlso, DO show the `_memory` database there if Datasette was started in `--crossdb` mode.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1952/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1493390939, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZA1Zb", "number": 1947, "title": "UI to create reduced scope tokens from the `/-/create-token` page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 22, "created_at": "2022-12-13T05:10:48Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T05:22:00Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-14T05:13:24Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split from:\r\n- #1855", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1947/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1495431932, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZInr8", "number": 1951, "title": "`datasette.create_token(...)` method for creating signed API tokens", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2022-12-14T01:25:34Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T02:43:45Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-14T02:42:05Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I need this for:\r\n- #1947\r\n\r\nAnd I can refactor this to use it too:\r\n- #1855\r\n\r\nBy making this a documented internal API it can be used by other plugins too. It's also going to be really useful for writing tests.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1951/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1423336089, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mKZ", "number": 1855, "title": "`datasette create-token` ability to create tokens with a reduced set of permissions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 19, "created_at": "2022-10-26T02:20:52Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-14T01:24:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T05:20:24Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Initial design ideas: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1289733483\r\n\r\n> Token design concept:\r\n> \r\n> ```json\r\n> {\r\n>     \"t\": {\r\n>         \"a\": [\"ir\", \"ur\", \"dr\"],\r\n>         \"d\": {\r\n>             \"fixtures\": [\"ir\", \"ur\", \"dr\"]\r\n>         },\r\n>         \"t\": {\r\n>             \"fixtures\": {\r\n>                 \"searchable\": [\"ir\"]\r\n>             }\r\n>         }\r\n>     }\r\n> }\r\n> ```\r\n> \r\n> That JSON would be minified and signed.\r\n> \r\n> Minified version of the above looks like this (101 characters):\r\n> \r\n> `{\"t\":{\"a\":[\"ir\",\"ur\",\"dr\"],\"d\":{\"fixtures\":[\"ir\",\"ur\",\"dr\"]},\"t\":{\"fixtures\":{\"searchable\":[\"ir\"]}}}}`\r\n> \r\n> The `\"t\"` key shows this is a token that as a default API key.\r\n> \r\n> `\"a\"` means \"all\" - these are permissions that have been granted on all tables and databases.\r\n> \r\n> `\"d\"` means \"databases\" - this is a way to set permissions for all tables in a specific database.\r\n> \r\n> `\"t\"` means \"tables\" - this lets you set permissions at a finely grained table level.\r\n> \r\n> Then the permissions themselves are two character codes which are shortened versions - so:\r\n> \r\n> * `ir` = `insert-row`\r\n> * `ur` = `update-row`\r\n> * `dr` = `delete-row`\r\n\r\n## Remaining tasks\r\n\r\n- [x] Add these options to the `datasette create-token` command\r\n- [x] Tests for `datasette create-token` options\r\n- [x] Documentation for those options at https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/authentication.html#datasette-create-token\r\n- [x] A way to handle permissions that don't have known abbreviations (permissions added by plugins). Probably need to solve the plugin permission registration problem as part of that\r\n- [x] Stop hard-coding names of actions in the `permission_allowed_actor_restrictions` function", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1855/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1495241162, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZH5HK", "number": 1950, "title": "Bad ?_sort returns a 500 error, should be a 400", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-13T22:08:16Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T22:23:22Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T22:23:22Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=bad\r\n\r\n<img width=\"453\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/207454481-2ba2e2bd-7400-47a6-b8a1-f898a2d364d8.png\">\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1950/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1468689139, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz", "number": 1914, "title": "Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-29T20:59:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T06:15:54Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tracking issue.\r\n\r\n- [ ] #1709\r\n- [ ] #1729\r\n- [ ] #1875", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1468495358, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh3X-", "number": 1910, "title": "Check incoming column types on various write APIs", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-29T18:09:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:09Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> I do think this needs type checking - I just tried and you really can send a string to an integer column and have it work, which feels bad.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1331089156_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1910/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1428630253, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJyrt", "number": 1873, "title": "Ensure insert API has good tests for rowid and compound primark key tables", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 11, "created_at": "2022-10-30T06:22:17Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Following:\r\n- #1866\r\n\r\nI need to design and implement various edge-cases or primary keys:\r\n\r\n- Table without an auto-incrementing primary key\r\n- Table with compound primary keys\r\n- Table with just a `rowid`", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1873/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "reopened"}
{"id": 1430797211, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub", "number": 1875, "title": "Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2022-11-01T03:14:15Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard.\r\n\r\nSince I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1447465004, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRpAs", "number": 1889, "title": "Ability to create new tokens via the API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-14T06:21:36Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Refs:\r\n- #1850\r\n\r\nInitially I decided that the API shouldn't be able to create new tokens at all - I don't like the idea of an API token holder creating themselves additional tokens.\r\n\r\nThen I realized that two of the API features are specifically more useful if you can generate fresh tokens via the API:\r\n\r\n- Tokes that expire after a time limit are MUCH more useful if they can be automatically generated\r\n- Likewise, tokens that are restricted to a subset of permissions (see #1855) make more sense to be generated like this, especially in conjunction with expiry times", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1889/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1216436131, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej", "number": 1721, "title": "Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-04-26T20:21:49Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:07Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Designed in:\r\n- #1720\r\n\r\nPart of:\r\n- #262\r\n- #1709", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1219385669, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5IrllF", "number": 1729, "title": "Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2022-04-28T22:28:14Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:07Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Part of:\r\n- #262\r\n- #1518", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1200649124, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHOk", "number": 1708, "title": "Datasette 1.0 alpha upcoming release notes", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-04-11T22:57:12Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm going to try writing the release notes first, to see if that helps unblock me.\r\n\r\n# \u26a0\ufe0f Any release notes in this issue are a draft, and should not be treated as the real thing \u26a0\ufe0f ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1708/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1200649502, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe", "number": 1709, "title": "Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-04-11T22:57:49Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1200650491, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7", "number": 1711, "title": "Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-04-11T22:59:27Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1197926598, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG", "number": 1705, "title": "How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8755003, "label": "Datasette 1.0a-next"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-04-08T23:16:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:29:05Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Among other things, needed by:\r\n- #1704", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1493404423, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZA4sH", "number": 1948, "title": "500 error on permission debug page when testing actors with _r", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-13T05:22:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T05:22:19Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "<img width=\"1272\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/207233390-ecb1b81b-c9f4-40a3-8131-5537ab23e9fc.png\">\r\n\r\nThe 500 error is silent unless you are looking at the DevTools network pane.\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1948/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1493339206, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAoxG", "number": 1946, "title": "`datasette --get` mechanism for sending tokens", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-13T04:25:05Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T04:36:57Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T04:36:57Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> For the tests for `datasette create-token` it would be useful if `datasette --get` had a mechanism for sending an `Authorization: Bearer X` header.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855#issuecomment-1347731288_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1946/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1493306655, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAg0f", "number": 1945, "title": "`view-instance` should not be checked for /-/actor.json", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-12-13T04:01:46Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T04:11:56Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T04:11:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Spotted this while testing:\r\n\r\n- #1855\r\n```\r\nexport TOKEN=$(datasette create-token root --secret s -a foo)\r\ncurl -H \"Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN\" http://localhost:8002/-/actor.json\r\n```\r\nReturned a Forbidden error (and not in JSON either).", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1945/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1138008042, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5D1J_q", "number": 1636, "title": "\"permissions\" propery in metadata for configuring arbitrary permissions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 14, "created_at": "2022-02-15T00:25:59Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T02:40:50Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T02:40:50Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `\"allow\"` block mechanism can already be used to configure various default permissions. When adding permissions to `datasette-tiddlywiki` I realized it would be good to be able to configure arbitrary permissions such as `edit-tiddlywiki` there too.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1485757511, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YjtxH", "number": 1939, "title": "register_permissions(datasette) plugin hook", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 20, "created_at": "2022-12-09T01:33:25Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T02:07:50Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T02:05:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "A plugin hook that adds more named permissions to the list which is initially populated here:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e539c1c024bc62d88df91d9107cbe37e7f0fe55f/datasette/permissions.py#L1-L19\r\n\r\nOriginally imagined this hook in this comment:\r\n\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1881#issuecomment-1301639370\r\n\r\nI need this for a few reasons:\r\n\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636\r\n  - Needs it in order to validate that permissions defined in `metadata.json` are set in the right place (don't set an instance permissions at table level for example)\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855\r\n  - Needs it to be able to register additional abbreviations for use in signed cookies\r\n  - And for validation when you use `datasette create-token` and pass in extra permissions\r\n- The https://latest.datasette.io/-/permissions debug interface needs it to add extra debug options to the `<select>`", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1939/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1384549993, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sho5p", "number": 1818, "title": "Setting to turn off table row counts entirely", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-09-24T06:39:22Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-11T02:03:09Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "There are situations - such as loading SQLite files remotely using HTTP range headers - where counting all of the rows in a table should be avoided entirely.\r\n\r\n> > Also, this chunked inefficiency means that I have to hack the URL to not load tables of a database as it seems to try to load the whole database when I click on a database.\r\n>\r\n> I bet that's because Datasette tries to show a count of all of the rows in each table when it shows the list on that page, which triggers a full table scan.\r\n>\r\n> Would be great to have a setting that turns that feature off, which could then be exposed as a query string option for Datasette Lite.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-lite/issues/49#issuecomment-1256880715_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1818/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1487738738, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy", "number": 1942, "title": "Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-10T01:08:53Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-10T01:11:30Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say \"I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page\"?\r\n\r\n`datasette-cluster-map` already needs this - the first thing it does when the page loads is `fetch()` a JSON representation of that same data.\r\n\r\nThis idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too.\r\n\r\nRefs:\r\n- #1711", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 1, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1198822563, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5HdJSj", "number": 1706, "title": "[feature] immutable mode for a directory, not just individual sqlite file", "user": {"value": 9020979, "label": "hydrosquall"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-04-10T00:50:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-09T19:11:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "## Motivation\r\n\r\n- I have a directory of sqlite databases\r\n- I'd like to use immutable mode when opening them for better performance [docs](https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.54/performance.html#immutable-mode)\r\n- Currently using this flag throws the following error\r\n\r\n    IsADirectoryError: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/name-of-directory'\r\n\r\n## Proposal\r\n\r\nImmutable flag works for both single files and directories\r\n\r\n    datasette -i /folder-of-sqlite-files", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1706/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1486036269, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ykx0t", "number": 1941, "title": "Mechanism for supporting key rotation for DATASETTE_SECRET", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-09T05:24:53Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-09T05:25:20Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Currently if you change `DATASETTE_SECRET` all existing signed tokens - both cookies and API tokens and potentially other things too - will instantly expire.\r\n\r\nAdding support for key rotation would allow keys to be rotated on a semi-regular basis without logging everyone out / invalidating every API token instantly.\r\n\r\nCan model this on how Django does it: https://github.com/django/django/commit/0dcd549bbe36c060f536ec270d34d9e7d4b8e6c7", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1941/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1434094365, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Veosd", "number": 1881, "title": "Tool for simulating permission checks against actors", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2022-11-03T04:43:20Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-09T01:38:21Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-04T00:13:05Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "In working on this issue:\r\n- #1855\r\n\r\nI realized that if I'm going to make actors more complicated (the proposed `_r` key for additional restricted permissions) I really need an interactive tool for simulating these checks, similar to the https://latest.datasette.io/-/allow-debug tool.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1881/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1483250004, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YaJlU", "number": 1936, "title": "Fix /db/table/-/upsert in the API explorer", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-12-08T00:59:34Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-08T01:36:02Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split from:\r\n- #1931\r\n- #1878\r\n\r\nThis is a bit tricky because the code needs to figure out what the primary keys are for an item, and whether or not `rowid` should be included.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1936/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1432013704, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsuI", "number": 1878, "title": "/db/table/-/upsert API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2022-11-01T20:01:18Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-08T01:12:18Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-08T01:12:17Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Equivalent to `sqlite-utils upsert`: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#upserting-data", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1878/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1473659191, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5X1kE3", "number": 1929, "title": "Incorrect link from the API explorer to the JSON API documentation", "user": {"value": 3556, "label": "davidbgk"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-12-03T02:08:58Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-06T19:36:23Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-06T19:34:20Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "I installed `datasette==1.0a1`.\r\n\r\nWhen I go to http://127.0.0.1:8001/-/api I have a link: `Use this tool to try out the [Datasette API](https://docs.datasette.io/en/1.0a1/json_api.html).` but that documentation page does not exist.\r\n\r\nI'm not sure where it has to be fixed, should it link to the stable page https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/json_api.html , the latest one https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/json_api.html#the-json-write-api or would it be more appropriated to deploy documentation for the `1.0a1` version?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1929/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1479920517, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5YNcuF", "number": 1934, "title": "Return number of ignored/replaced items from /-/insert", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-12-06T19:01:58Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-06T19:02:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Idea from here:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1934/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1473481262, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5X04ou", "number": 1928, "title": "Hacker News Datasette write demo", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2022-12-02T21:17:41Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-02T23:47:11Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-02T21:43:19Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Idea is to have my existing scraper at https://github.com/simonw/scrape-hacker-news-by-domain also write to my private Datasette Cloud account, then create an atom feed from it.\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1928/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1175690070, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW", "number": 1676, "title": "Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing?", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-03-21T17:14:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-02T01:23:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions\r\n>\r\n>> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted.\r\n>> \r\n>> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`:\r\n>\r\n> That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1471969984, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5XvHrA", "number": 1926, "title": "Release notes for 1.0a1 (and release it)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 7867486, "label": "Datasette 1.0a1"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-12-01T21:18:12Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-01T22:06:13Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-01T22:06:12Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Mainly CORS support and a few small bug fixes.\r\n\r\nChanges: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a0...99da46f7258225fc6fd8e94ddc20859ccccc4109", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1926/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1214859703, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5IaUm3", "number": 1719, "title": "Refactor `RowView` and remove `RowTableShared`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-04-25T18:06:24Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-01T21:15:19Z", "closed_at": "2022-04-25T18:33:44Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> The `RowTableShared` class is making this a whole lot more complicated.\r\n> \r\n> I'm going to split the `RowView` view out into an entirely separate `views/row.py` module.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1715#issuecomment-1108875068_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1719/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1215174094, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5IbhXO", "number": 1720, "title": "Design plugin hook for extras", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 14, "created_at": "2022-04-26T00:08:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-01T21:15:19Z", "closed_at": "2022-04-26T20:20:27Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Refs:\r\n- #262\r\n- #1709\r\n\r\nI realized that this is a really natural plugin hook - and if I design it as a hook I can implement Datasette's core extras as default plugins.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1720/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1212823665, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ISjhx", "number": 1715, "title": "Refactor TableView to use asyncinject", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 13, "created_at": "2022-04-22T21:43:39Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-01T21:15:18Z", "closed_at": "2022-04-28T22:26:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I've been working on a dependency injection mechanism in a separate library:\r\n\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/asyncinject\r\n\r\nI think it's ready to try out with Datasette to see if it's a pattern that will work here.\r\n\r\nI'm going to attempt to refactor `TableView` to use it. There are two overall goals here:\r\n\r\n- Use `asyncinject` to add parallel execution of some aspects of the table page - most notably I want to be able to execute the `count(*)` query, the `select ...` query, the various faceting queries and the facet suggestion queries in parallel - and measure if doing so is good for performance.\r\n- Use it to execute different output formats (possibly with some changes to the existing `register_output_renderer()` plugin hook). I want CSV and JSON to use the same mechanism that plugins use.\r\n\r\nStretch goal is to get this working with streaming data too, see:\r\n\r\n- #1101", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1715/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1469973742, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5XngTu", "number": 1922, "title": "Make sure CORS works for write APIs", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 7867486, "label": "Datasette 1.0a1"}, "comments": 13, "created_at": "2022-11-30T17:15:55Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-01T18:47:00Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-01T18:47:00Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split from:\r\n- #1850", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1922/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1470509936, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5XpjNw", "number": 1924, "title": "Docs for replace:true and ignore:true options for insert API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 7867486, "label": "Datasette 1.0a1"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-12-01T01:33:25Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-01T18:15:15Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-01T02:08:02Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Equivalent to https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#insert-replacing-data", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1924/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1469821027, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xm7Bj", "number": 1921, "title": "Document methods to get canned queries", "user": {"value": 25778, "label": "eyeseast"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-30T15:26:33Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T23:34:21Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "Two methods will get canned queries for a Datasette instance:\r\n\r\n[`Datasette.get_canned_queries`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/datasette/app.py#L575) will return all canned queries for a database that an `actor` can see.\r\n\r\n[`Datasette.get_canned_query`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/datasette/app.py#L592) will return a single canned query by name.\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1921/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1470320227, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xo05j", "number": 1923, "title": "latest.datasette.io Cloud Run deploys failing", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-11-30T22:49:34Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T23:04:56Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-30T23:04:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3587402085/jobs/6038106719v\r\n\r\n```\r\nWarning: \"service_account_key\" has been deprecated. Please switch to using google-github-actions/auth which supports both Workload Identity Federation and Service Account Key JSON authentication. For more details, see https://github.com/google-github-actions/setup-gcloud#authorization\r\nError: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud failed with: failed to execute command `gcloud --quiet auth activate-service-account *** --key-file -`: /opt/hostedtoolcache/gcloud/275.0.0/x64/lib/googlecloudsdk/core/console/console_io.py:544: SyntaxWarning: \"is\" with a literal. Did you mean \"==\"?\r\n  if answer is None or (answer is '' and default is not None):\r\nERROR: gcloud failed to load: module 'collections' has no attribute 'MutableMapping'\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1923/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1469796454, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xm1Bm", "number": 1920, "title": "Document Datasette.metadata() method", "user": {"value": 25778, "label": "eyeseast"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-30T15:10:36Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T15:10:36Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "Code is here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/datasette/app.py#L503\r\n\r\nThis will be the official way to access metadata from plugins.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1920/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1108671952, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CFP3Q", "number": 1605, "title": "Scripted exports", "user": {"value": 25778, "label": "eyeseast"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2022-01-19T23:45:55Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T15:06:38Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "Posting this while I'm thinking about it: I mentioned at the end of [this thread](https://twitter.com/eyeseast/status/1483893011658551299) that I'm usually doing `datasette --get` to export canned queries.\r\n\r\nI used to use a tool called [datafreeze](https://github.com/pudo/datafreeze) to do scripted exports, but that project looks dead now. The ergonomics of it are pretty nice, though, and the `Freezefile.yml` structure is actually not too far from Datasette's canned queries.\r\n\r\nThis is related to the idea for `datasette query` (#1356) but I think it's a distinct feature. It's most likely a plugin, but I want to raise it here because it's probably something other people have thought about.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1469044738, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9gC", "number": 1918, "title": "API explorer should list mutable databases first", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 7867486, "label": "Datasette 1.0a1"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-30T04:53:33Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T05:22:07Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-30T05:07:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://latest.datasette.io/-/api hides `ephemeral` down at the bottom, would be more interesting if it was at the top.\r\n\r\nRelated:\r\n- #1915 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1918/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1469062686, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5XkB4e", "number": 1919, "title": "Intermittent `test_delete_row` test failure ", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-30T05:18:46Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T05:20:56Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3580503393/jobs/6022689591\r\n\r\n```\r\n        delete_response = await ds_write.client.post(\r\n            \"/data/{}/{}/-/delete\".format(table, delete_path),\r\n            headers={\r\n                \"Authorization\": \"***\".format(write_token(ds_write)),\r\n            },\r\n        )\r\n>       assert delete_response.status_code == 200\r\nE       assert 404 == 200\r\nE        +  where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code\r\n\r\n/home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_api_write.py:396: AssertionError\r\n=========================== short test summary info ============================\r\nFAILED tests/test_api_write.py::test_delete_row[compound_pk_table-row_for_create2-pks2-article,k] - assert 404 == 200\r\n +  where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code\r\n```\r\nThis passes most of the time, but very occasionally fails - in this case in Python 3.7\r\n\r\nIt seems to only fail for the `article,k` compound primary key test.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1919/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1469015001, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj2PZ", "number": 1916, "title": "GET requests against POST endpoints should not 500 error", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 7867486, "label": "Datasette 1.0a1"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-30T04:04:43Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T05:15:19Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-30T05:15:19Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "![CF37BA4D-0677-4DDD-A339-EAF163BB63B7](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204705025-6f88e9f7-757d-45e8-a89c-ab97e84781e8.png)\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1916/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1469043836, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9R8", "number": 1917, "title": "Don't allow writable API to edit the `_memory` database", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 7867486, "label": "Datasette 1.0a1"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-11-30T04:51:59Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T05:07:56Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-30T05:07:55Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It shows up on https://latest.datasette.io/-/api (once you are signed in as root) - but there's no point in creating tables in it because they likely won't persist from one request to the next, as it's not a shared named database.\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1122\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204710529-bfab8442-d89b-4928-9b9a-e39bc53c1673.png\">\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1917/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1468709531, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xirqb", "number": 1915, "title": "Interactive demo of Datasette 1.0 write APIs", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2022-11-29T21:16:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T04:05:46Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-30T04:05:46Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm going to try to get this working on https://latest.datasette.io/ - it already has a way for people to sign in as root, but none of the databases there are writable.\r\n\r\nSo I'm going to build a plugin which adds a writable named in-memory database.\r\n\r\nAnd some kind of mechanism for clearing out that database on a regular basis - maybe tables in that database get deleted automatically an hour after they are created?\r\n\r\n(Would be neat to display their time-left-until-deleted too)", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1915/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1421529723, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5UutJ7", "number": 1850, "title": "Write API in Datasette core", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 13, "created_at": "2022-10-24T22:13:24Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T20:11:20Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T20:11:20Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I need this for Datasette Cloud, and in thinking it through I realized that it's really time Datasette grew a default write API as well.\r\n\r\nI'm going to mostly model this off `sqlite-utils`, since I've spent a bunch of time iterating on a pseudo-JSON API for that over the past few years (piping JSON to stdin etc).\r\n\r\nI want this for Datasette 1.0. I'm going to be building it in the new [1.0-dev](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/tree/1.0-dev) branch, which is automatically deployed to https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/ running on Cloud Run.\r\n\r\nAPI features to build:\r\n\r\n- [x] #1852\r\n  - [x] #1856\r\n  - [x] #1857\r\n  - [x] #1858\r\n  - [x] #1859\r\n- [x] #1871\r\n  - [x] #1888\r\n- [x] #1868\r\n- [x] #1851\r\n- [x] #1863\r\n- [x] #1864\r\n- [x] #1866\r\n- [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882\r\n- [x] #1862\r\n- [x] #1874\r\n  - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1887\r\n- [x] #1877\r\n\r\nBumped to later on:\r\n\r\n- #1855\r\n- #1878\r\n- #1873\r\n- #1875\r\n- Make sure CORS works\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1889\r\n- Alter a table - `sqlite-utils transform` style (more powerful than straight ALTER)\r\n- Execute SQL against a write connection\r\n- Maybe even multiple write SQL statements bundled in a single transaction\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1867\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1850/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1468603401, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5XiRwJ", "number": 1913, "title": "Release Datasette 1.0a0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2022-11-29T19:41:42Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T20:10:35Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T20:10:35Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I attempted the release just now - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/1.0a0 -  and got an unexpected test failure:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3577355358/attempts/1\r\n\r\n```\r\n>       assert delete_response.status_code == 200\r\nE       assert 404 == 200\r\nE        +  where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code\r\n\r\n/home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_api_write.py:396: AssertionError\r\n=========================== short test summary info ============================\r\nFAILED tests/test_api_write.py::test_delete_row[compound_pk_table-row_for_create2-pks2-article,k] - assert 404 == 200\r\n +  where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code\r\n```\r\nI hit \"retry\" on that test but I expect it to fail again.\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1913/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1432012302, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsYO", "number": 1877, "title": "Refactor and tidy up final write API code", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-01T20:00:11Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T19:44:16Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T19:44:07Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "- `views/table.py` has got a bit too big - I think the write classes should be pulled out into a separate module.\r\n- [x] There's duplicate logic for deciding if the table and database exist and checking permissions", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1877/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1450312343, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WcgKX", "number": 1892, "title": "Merge 1.0-dev branch back to main", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-11-15T20:04:25Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T19:40:23Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T19:40:23Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm committed enough to the 1.0 work now that I'm ready for the `main` branch to reflect that instead.\r\n\r\nIf I need to make any dot-releases against 0.63 I can do those from a branch.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1892/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1450303205, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wcd7l", "number": 1891, "title": "1.0a0 release notes", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-11-15T19:58:20Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T19:23:41Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T19:23:41Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This release will mainly help preview the new Datasette write API:\r\n- #1850", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1891/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1425029275, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dib", "number": 1864, "title": "Delete a single record from an existing table", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-10-27T04:53:22Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T18:54:04Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T18:54:04Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "API design:\r\n```\r\nPOST /db/table/row-pks/-/delete\r\nOr...\r\nDELETE /db/table/row-pks/-/delete\r\n```\r\nI'm just going to do `POST` for the moment, like I did here:\r\n- #1874\r\n\r\nPermission: `delete-row`\r\n\r\nStill needed:\r\n\r\n- [ ] Tests for rowid tables\r\n- [ ] Tests for compound primary keys", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1864/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1468519699, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh9UT", "number": 1911, "title": "`/db/-/create` should support creating tables with compound primary keys", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-11-29T18:30:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T18:50:58Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T18:48:05Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Found myself needing this to write the tests for:\r\n- #1864 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1911/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1425029242, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dh6", "number": 1863, "title": "Update a single record in an existing table", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 16, "created_at": "2022-10-27T04:53:17Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-29T18:08:53Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-29T18:06:37Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "API design:\r\n\r\n```\r\nPOST /db/table/row-pks/-/update\r\n{\r\n   \"field\": \"updated_value\"\r\n}\r\n```\r\nOnly the fields that you pass will be updated.\r\n\r\nMaybe this is the wrong design though? The design for insert currently looks like this:\r\n\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1294224185\r\n\r\n```\r\nPOST /db/table/-/insert\r\nAuthorization: Bearer xxx\r\nContent-Type: application/json\r\n{\r\n  \"row\": {\r\n    \"id\": 1,\r\n    \"name\": \"New name\"\r\n  }\r\n}\r\n```\r\nI could use the same format for `/-/update`, but in this case the API doesn't require you to pass every field so `\"row\"` doesn't seem like the right key.\r\n\r\nI think I'll go with this:\r\n\r\n```\r\nPOST /db/table/1/-/update\r\nAuthorization: Bearer xxx\r\nContent-Type: application/json\r\n{\r\n  \"update\": {\r\n    \"name\": \"New name\"\r\n  }\r\n}\r\n```\r\nThe benefit of having an `\"update\"` key is that it allows me to use other keys in the future. Maybe a `\"alter\": true` key to indicate that new columns should be added if they are missing.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1466952626, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xb-uy", "number": 1909, "title": "Option to sort facets alphabetically", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-28T19:18:14Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-28T19:19:26Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Suggested here:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/discussions/1908", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1909/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1439009231, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VxYnP", "number": 1884, "title": "Exclude virtual tables from datasette inspect", "user": {"value": 25778, "label": "eyeseast"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2022-11-07T21:26:01Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-21T04:40:56Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "Ran `inspect` on a spatialite database and got these warnings:\r\n\r\n```\r\nERROR: conn=<sqlite3.Connection object at 0x119e46110>, sql = 'select count(*) from [SpatialIndex]', params = None: no such module: VirtualSpatialIndex\r\nERROR: conn=<sqlite3.Connection object at 0x119e46110>, sql = 'select count(*) from [ElementaryGeometries]', params = None: no such module: VirtualElementary\r\nERROR: conn=<sqlite3.Connection object at 0x119e46110>, sql = 'select count(*) from [KNN]', params = None: no such module: VirtualKNN\r\n```\r\n\r\nIt still worked, but probably want to catch this.\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1884/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1455928469, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx7SV", "number": 1903, "title": "Refactor all error classes into a datasette.exceptions module", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-11-18T22:44:45Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-20T22:35:01Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "While working on this issue:\r\n- #1896\r\n\r\nI realized that Datasette has error classes scattered around a fair bit, including some in the `datasette.utils.asgi` module for some reason.\r\n\r\nI should clean these up.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1903/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1456012874, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyP5K", "number": 1905, "title": "`publish heroku` failing due to old Python version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-11-19T00:01:45Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-19T01:12:05Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-19T00:52:29Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Reported on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1042814317118115901\r\n\r\n```\r\n-----> Building on the Heroku-22 stack\r\n-----> Determining which buildpack to use for this app\r\n-----> Python app detected\r\n-----> Using Python version specified in runtime.txt\r\n !     Requested runtime 'python-3.8.10' is not available for this stack (heroku-22).\r\n !     For supported versions, see: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-support\r\n !     Push rejected, failed to compile Python app.\r\n\r\n !     Push failed\r\n \u25b8    Build failed\r\n```\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1905/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1456013930, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyQJq", "number": 1906, "title": "Extract publish Heroku support to a plugin", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-19T00:02:51Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-19T00:03:10Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> This is a strong argument for extracting the Heroku support out to a plugin - it would allow this to be fixed with a plugin release without needing to push a full release of Datasette itself.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1905#issuecomment-1320678715_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1906/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1455932972, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx8Ys", "number": 1904, "title": "Datasette Lite tests failing due to httpx upgrade", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-18T22:49:31Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T22:57:48Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-18T22:52:22Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Same problem as this one:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-lite/issues/56\r\n\r\nCaused this failure: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3500765964", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1904/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1452364777, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WkVPp", "number": 1896, "title": "Extract logic for resolving a URL to a database / table / row", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-11-16T22:25:20Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T22:57:47Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-18T22:56:55Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": ">  In trying to write this I realize that there's a lot of duplicated code with delete row, specifically around resolving the incoming URL into a row (or a database or a table).\r\n>\r\n> Since this is so common, I think it's worth extracting the logic out first.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1317755263_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1896/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1452572348, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WlH68", "number": 1900, "title": "datasette package --spatialite throws error during build", "user": {"value": 419145, "label": "rdmurphy"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 11, "created_at": "2022-11-17T02:03:28Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T08:00:38Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Hello! Attempting to use `datasette package` to bundle up a SpatiaLite DB and I'm getting this error during the `docker build`:\r\n\r\n```\r\nsqlite3.OperationalError: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mod_spatialite.so.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory\r\n```\r\n\r\nSeems to be throwing when this step is ran:\r\n\r\n```\r\nERROR [6/6] RUN datasette inspect results.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis is with `v0.63.1`.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1900/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1450796965, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WeWel", "number": 1894, "title": "Initialize CodeMirror during DOMContentLoaded instead of onload", "user": {"value": 95570, "label": "bgrins"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-16T03:52:19Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T07:29:02Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-18T07:29:02Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "As per https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893/files#r1023248927 this should prevent a flash between the textarea being replaced by CodeMirror.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1894/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1452495049, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wk1DJ", "number": 1899, "title": "Clicking within the CodeMirror area below the SQL (i.e. when there's only a single line) doesn't cause the editor to get focused ", "user": {"value": 95570, "label": "bgrins"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-11-17T00:29:52Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T07:28:28Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-18T07:20:53Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "After the upgrade to 6 (#1893) I noticed this. I think it's because we're doing overflow:hidden to accomplish the CSS resizer.\r\n\r\nWhen there's a single line of SQL there's a gap below that line where clicking doesn't do anything. It should focus at the end of the line.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1899/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1453813400, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wp26Y", "number": 1901, "title": "Some plugins show \"home\" breadcrumbs twice in the top left", "user": {"value": 95570, "label": "bgrins"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2022-11-17T18:44:58Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T07:22:37Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-18T07:02:56Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "<img width=\"1023\" alt=\"Screenshot 2022-11-17 at 10 44 12 AM\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/95570/202531505-b8632f70-d95a-425f-b2f2-6380b153478b.png\">\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1901/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1454532488, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WsmeI", "number": 1902, "title": "Document {% block crumbs %} for plugin authors", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-18T06:16:30Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T06:16:39Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> For `datasette-copyable` I want to show breadcrumbs that take database/instance permissions into account, so I'm removing `{% block nav %}` entirely and replacing it with this:\r\n>\r\n> ```html+jinja\r\n> {% block crumbs %}\r\n> {{ crumbs.nav(request=request, database=database, table=table) }}\r\n> {% endblock %}\r\n> ```\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1901#issuecomment-1319588163_\r\n\r\nI should document this.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1902/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1452457263, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wkr0v", "number": 1897, "title": "Serve schema JSON to the SQL editor to enable autocomplete", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2022-11-16T23:47:45Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-18T05:33:20Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-18T02:54:43Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "See:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1893#issuecomment-1317831555\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1897/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1448143294, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WUOm-", "number": 1890, "title": "Autocomplete text entry for filter values that correspond to facets", "user": {"value": 536941, "label": "fgregg"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 16, "created_at": "2022-11-14T14:11:31Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-17T00:47:36Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-16T03:23:01Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "datasette allows users to enter in the value for named parameters into a free-text form field.\r\n\r\nI think it would add a lot of usability, if the form field could be a drop down of options when query value is already a faceted column.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1890/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1452360613, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WkUOl", "number": 1895, "title": "Avoid using host name when building absolute URLs?", "user": {"value": 14294, "label": "hubgit"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-16T22:21:27Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-16T22:21:27Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "When deploying Datasette to Cloud Run and rewriting certain routes from a Firebase app to the Cloud Run service, some of the URLs in the page start with `https://[service].run.app` rather than the (custom) domain of the Firebase app. \r\n\r\nI guess this is because a) the custom domain of the Firebase app isn't being passed through in the `host` header of the request to the Cloud Run instance and b) the `absolute_url` function in Datasette is using information from the request to build the URL.\r\n\r\nWould it be possible to not use the host name when building the absolute URLs, i.e. only include the path in the URL?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1895/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1433576351, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VcqOf", "number": 1880, "title": "Datasette with many and large databases > Memory use", "user": {"value": 525934, "label": "amitkoth"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-11-02T18:10:27Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-16T17:50:29Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Datasette maintains an in-memory SQLite database with details of the the databases, tables and columns for all of the attached databases.\r\n\r\nThe above is from the docs ^. There's two problems here - the number of datasette \"instances\" in a single server/VM and the size of the database itself. We want the **opposite** of in-memory, including what happens on SQLlite - documented in https://www.sqlite.org/inmemorydb.html\r\n\r\nFrom the context in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1150 - does it mean datasette is memory-bound to the size of the dataset - which might be a deal-breaker for many large-scale use cases?\r\n\r\nIn an extreme case - let's say a single server had 100 SQLlite databases, which would enable 100 \"instances\" of datasette to run, one per client (e.g. in a SaaS multi-tenant environment). How could we achieve all these goals:\r\n\r\n1. Allow any _one_ of these 100 databases to grow to say 2Tb in size \r\n2. Have one datasette instance, which connects to 1 of the 100 instances, based on incoming credentials/tenant ID\r\n3. Minimize memory use entirely - both by datasette and SQLlite, such that almost all operations are executed in real-time on-disk with little to no memory consumption per-tenant, or per-database.\r\n\r\nAny ideas appreciated - we're looking to use this in a SaaS type of setting - many instances, single server.\r\n\r\n@simonw great work on datasette, in general! Possibly related to https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 but we don't want use any kind of serverless infra - this is a long-running VM/server.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1880/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1447388809, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRWaJ", "number": 1887, "title": "Add a confirm step to the drop table API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-11-14T04:59:53Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:59Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-14T05:18:51Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> In playing with the API explorer just now I realized it's way too easy to accidentally drop a table using it.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1871#issuecomment-1313097057_\r\n\r\nAdded drop table API in:\r\n- #1874", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1887/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1429030341, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VLUXF", "number": 1874, "title": "API to drop a table", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-10-30T21:55:11Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:53Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-14T05:45:06Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "`POST /db/table/-/drop`\r\n\r\nRequire `drop-table` permission.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1874/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1425011030, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U7_FW", "number": 1862, "title": "Create a new table from one or more records, `sqlite-utils` style", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-10-27T04:25:02Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:47Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-15T06:42:09Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It's interesting to also think about what the form-based UI for this could look like - since that would involve users creating new columns of different types on the fly.\r\n\r\nWill need the `create-table` permission.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1862/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1435294468, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VjNsE", "number": 1882, "title": "`/db/-/create` API for creating tables", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2022-11-03T21:44:32Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:43Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-15T06:00:41Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": ">  It really feels like this should be accompanied by a `/db/-/create` API for creating tables. I had to add that to `sqlite-utils` eventually (initially it only supported creating by passing in an example document):\r\n>\r\n> https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#cli-create-table\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1862#issuecomment-1299073433_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1426001541, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U_w6F", "number": 1866, "title": "API for bulk inserting records into a table", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2022-10-27T17:19:25Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:34Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-30T06:04:07Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Similar to https://github.com/simonw/datasette-insert/blob/0.8/README.md#inserting-data-and-creating-tables\r\n\r\nI expect this to become by far the most common way that data gets into a Datasette instance - more so than the individual row API in:\r\n- #1851 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1866/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1421544654, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5UuwzO", "number": 1851, "title": "API to insert a single record into an existing table", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 22, "created_at": "2022-10-24T22:24:21Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:18Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-28T00:59:25Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Controlled by a new `insert-row` permission.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1426195437, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAgPt", "number": 1868, "title": "Design URLs for the write API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-10-27T19:55:30Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:14Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-27T20:07:01Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "My original design for this issue:\r\n- #1851\r\n\r\nWas `POST /db/table` with JSON of `{\"insert\": {...}}`.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1868/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1447439985, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRi5x", "number": 1888, "title": "API explorer should take immutability into account", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-11-14T06:00:14Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:10Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-14T06:04:48Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Refs:\r\n- #1871\r\n\r\nI noticed the API explorer doesn't show any links on https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/-/api because the `fixtures` database is immutable.\r\n\r\nIt should still show read examples there.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1888/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1427293909, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VEsbV", "number": 1871, "title": "API explorer tool", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 24, "created_at": "2022-10-28T13:49:11Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:05Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-14T04:59:59Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The API will be much easier to develop if there's a page that helps you execute JSON POSTs against it.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1871/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1423369494, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1uUW", "number": 1859, "title": "datasette create-token CLI command", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-10-26T03:12:59Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:59:00Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-26T04:31:39Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The CLI equivalent of the `/-/create-token` page.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1859/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1423364990, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1tN-", "number": 1858, "title": "`max_signed_tokens_ttl` setting for a maximum duration on API tokens", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-10-26T03:05:53Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:58:52Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-27T03:15:05Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It's currently possible to use `/-/create-token` to create a token that lasts forever.\r\n\r\nSome administrators may wish to have a maximum expiry instead. I should support that with a setting.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1858/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1423347412, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1o7U", "number": 1857, "title": "Prevent API tokens from using /-/create-token to create more tokens", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-10-26T02:38:09Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:57:11Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-26T02:57:26Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> It strikes me that users should NOT be able to use a token to create additional tokens.\r\n>\r\n> The current design actually does allow that, since the `dstok_` Bearer token can be used to authenticate calls to the `/-/create-token` page.\r\n>\r\n> So I think I need a mechanism whereby that page can only allow access to users authenticated by cookie.\r\n> \r\n> Not obvious how to do that though, since Datasette's authentication actor system is designed to abstract that detail away!\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1291417100_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1857/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1423336122, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mK6", "number": 1856, "title": "allow_signed_tokens setting for disabling API signed token mechanism", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-10-26T02:20:55Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:57:05Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-26T02:58:35Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Had some design thoughts here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291272280\r\n\r\nI liked this option the most:\r\n\r\n    --setting allow_create_tokens off", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1856/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1421552095, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uuynf", "number": 1852, "title": "Default API token authentication mechanism", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8658075, "label": "Datasette 1.0a0"}, "comments": 30, "created_at": "2022-10-24T22:31:07Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-15T19:57:00Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-26T02:19:54Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "API authentication will be via `Authorization: Bearer XXX` request headers.\r\n\r\nI'm inclined to add a default token mechanism to Datasette based on tokens that are signed with the `DATASETTE_SECRET`. Maybe the root user can access `/-/create-token` which provides a UI for generating a time-limited signed token? Could also have a `datasette token` command for creating such tokens at the command-line.\r\n\r\nPlugins can then define alternative ways of creating tokens, such as the existing https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-auth-tokens plugin.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1289706439_\r\n      ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1446657889, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5WOj9h", "number": 1885, "title": "Integrate inside GUI app (tkinter)", "user": {"value": 5115787, "label": "dmalves"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-11-13T00:10:43Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-13T00:11:09Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Hi, I'd like to integrate datasette inside a tkinter app. The app should be able to start/stop datasette server. How could I integrate datasette inside my app, so it can start and stop datasette server?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1885/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1435917503, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Vlly_", "number": 1883, "title": "Errors when using table filters behind a proxy", "user": {"value": 31312775, "label": "mattmalcher"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 13, "created_at": "2022-11-04T11:18:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-11T09:20:22Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-11T06:54:58Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Using datasette==0.63 table filters do not respect the `base_url` setting as described [here](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/deploying.html#running-datasette-behind-a-proxy)\r\n\r\nTo reproduce, go to:\r\nhttps://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/prefix/fixtures/binary_data\r\n\r\nThen use the table filter buttons.\r\nThe `/prefix/` is dropped, resulting in URL not found:\r\nhttps://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/fixtures/binary_data?_sort=rowid&rowid__exact=1\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 1}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 802513359, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU4MDI1MTMzNTk=", "number": 1217, "title": "Possible to deploy as a python app (for Rstudio connect server)?", "user": {"value": 6165713, "label": "plpxsk"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2021-02-05T22:21:24Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-04T11:37:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Is it possible to deploy a `datasette` application as a python\u00a0web app?\r\n\r\nIn my enterprise, I have option to deploy python apps via [Rstudio Connect](https://github.com/rstudio/rsconnect-python), and I would like to publish a `datasette` dashboard for sharing.\r\n\r\nI welcome any pointers to converting `datasette serve` into a python app that can be run as something like `python datasette.py --my_data.db`", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1217/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1432037325, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWyfN", "number": 1879, "title": "Make it easier to fix URL proxy problems", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-11-01T20:19:23Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-01T20:33:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This came up on Discord again today: figuring out how to run Datasette behind a proxy that might hide the incoming Host: header (and strip HTTPS) is really hard!\r\n\r\nhttps://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1037012475322847263", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1879/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}
{"id": 1431786951, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VV1XH", "number": 1876, "title": "SQL query should wrap on SQL interrupted screen", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-11-01T17:14:01Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-01T17:22:33Z", "closed_at": "2022-11-01T17:22:33Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Just saw this:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1197\" alt=\"CleanShot 2022-11-01 at 10 12 16@2x\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/199294909-df6fcb3b-40d0-4444-8a92-a7a358a28d86.png\">", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1876/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1428560020, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJhiU", "number": 1872, "title": "SITE-BUSTING ERROR: \"render_template() called before await ds.invoke_startup()\"", "user": {"value": 192568, "label": "mroswell"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-10-30T02:28:39Z", "updated_at": "2022-10-30T06:26:01Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-30T06:26:01Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "1. My https://list.saferdisinfectants.org/disinfectants/listN page (linked from https://SaferDisinfectants.org ) has been running beautifully for a year and a half, including a GitHub Actions workflow that's been routinely updating the database.\r\n\r\n2. I received a recent report that the list page is down. I don't know when it went down, but the content is replaced with: \"render_template() called before await ds.invoke_startup()\"\r\n\r\n3. The local datasette repo runs without incident.\r\n\r\n4. The site is hosted on vercel, linked to my github repo. Perhaps  some vercel changes were made, but not by anyone on our side. Here is a screenshot of the current project settings:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"877\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 9 23 30 PM\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/192568/198859474-341a5504-88b8-452d-bd06-e988cbe75e6c.png\">\r\n\r\nHere a screenshot of the latest deployment status:\r\n<img width=\"1351\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 10 19 21 PM\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/192568/198859641-ad3d99ba-a41d-4b98-88f6-e3a01fe9f238.png\">\r\n\r\nThis is my repository:\r\nhttps://github.com/mroswell/list-N\r\n(I notice: datasette==0.59 in my requirements.txt file)\r\n\r\nBecause it's been long while since I actively worked on this or any other datasette project, I forget a lot of what I knew at one point. Perhaps some configuration file could be missing? Or perhaps I just need to know the right incantation to add to that vercel settings page. \r\n\r\nHelp is welcome as the nonprofit org is soon hosting its annual conference, and we'd love to have the page working again.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1872/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 1426253476, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAuak", "number": 1869, "title": "Release 0.63", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-10-27T20:53:01Z", "updated_at": "2022-10-27T22:24:38Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-27T22:11:33Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Most of the release notes are already written:\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.63a0\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.63a1", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1869/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}