{"id": 318490133, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTg0OTAxMzM=", "number": 241, "title": "Default datasette logging format should be JSON", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-27T17:32:48Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Structured logs are better. Datasette should default to outputting it's HTTP access log lines as newline delimited JSON instead of the Sanic default format it uses at the moment.\r\n\r\nFor improved greppability these logs should have keys ordered in a consistent way. Python's JSON module can do this with ordered dictionaries.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/241/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 314771615, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTQ3NzE2MTU=", "number": 218, "title": "Support custom unit display in order to handle \"$10,000\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-16T18:39:31Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:38Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I tried to get Datasette to display `$10,000` using the new units support but we currently only display units as a suffix:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/10a34f995c70daa37a8a2aa02c3135a4b023a24c/datasette/app.py#L563-L572\r\n\r\nIt would be neat if there was a mechanism for specifying a custom unit display - maybe something like this:\r\n\r\n```\r\n{\r\n \"custom_units\": {\r\n \"us_dollar\": {\r\n \"unit\": \"us_dollar = [] = $\",\r\n \"format\": \"${:,}\"\r\n }\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/218/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 312395790, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTU3OTA=", "number": 197, "title": "Ability to sort by more than one column", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-09T05:13:30Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split off from #189.\r\n\r\nI'd like to support \"sort by X descending, then by Y ascending if there are dupes for X\" as well. Suggested syntax for that:\r\n\r\n ?_sort_desc=X&_sort=Y\r\n\r\nwe currently only allow one argument to be sent. We should allow as many arguments as there are columns, for example:\r\n\r\n ?_sort=department&_sort_desc=precinct&_sort=age&_sort_desc=size", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/197/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 312396095, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTYwOTU=", "number": 198, "title": "Ability to sort with nulls last", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-09T05:15:40Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split off from #189\r\n\r\nHere's how to do that in SQL: https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight-2628db9?sql=select+rowid%2C+*+from+%5Bnfl-wide-receivers%2Fadvanced-historical%5D%0D%0Aorder+by+case+when+career_ranypa+is+null+then+1+else+0+end%2C+career_ranypa%2C+rowid\r\n\r\n order by case when career_ranypa is null then 1 else 0 end, career_ranypa", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/198/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}