{"id": 267515678, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUyNjc1MTU2Nzg=", "number": 3, "title": "Make individual column valuables addressable, with smart content types", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2017-10-23T01:11:32Z", "updated_at": "2017-12-10T03:11:58Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Some SQLite databases embed images in columns. It would be cool if these had URLs.\r\n\r\n /database-name-7sha256/table-name/compound-pk/column\r\n /database-name-7sha256/table-name/compound-pk/column.json\r\n /database-name-7sha256/table-name/compound-pk/column.png\r\n /database-name-7sha256/table-name/compound-pk/column.gif\r\n /database-name-7sha256/table-name/compound-pk/column.txt\r\n\r\nThe one without an explicit file extension auto-detects the correct extension.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/3/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 268110769, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUyNjgxMTA3Njk=", "number": 33, "title": "Use locust for benchmarking and load tests", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2017-10-24T17:00:09Z", "updated_at": "2017-12-10T03:12:16Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/locustio/locust\r\n\r\nNeeded for #32 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/33/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 316621102, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTY2MjExMDI=", "number": 235, "title": "Add limit on the size in KB of data returned from a single query", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2018-04-22T23:01:15Z", "updated_at": "2018-04-24T00:30:02Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Datasette limits the number of rows returned to 1,000 and limits the time spent executing a SQL query to 1000ms - and both of these limits can be customized.\r\n\r\nIt does not have a limit on the size of the response returned. It's possible to compose maliciously large SQL responses in a small number of rows using mechanisms like the `group_concat()` aggregate function. It would be good to avoid malicious SQL creating 100MB+ responses and potentially crashing the server.\r\n\r\nI think the easiest place to implement that is here:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/f3f42957128c1e7ece584d45d9167f2ac003a3b8/datasette/app.py#L175-L190\r\n\r\nCurrently we use `cursor.fetchmany()` to fetch up to 1,001 rows at once. Instead, we could switch to iterating through `cursor.fetchone()` (or just using `for row in cursor`) and keeping a running tally of the size of the response as we go - maybe just using `rough_response_size += len(str(row))`. If that goes above a certain threshold we can terminate the response with an error, like we do with timelimits.\r\n\r\nThe bigger challenge here is understanding how well this approach works and what impact it will have on overall Datasette performance. I think I need #33 for this.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/235/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 320132682, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjAxMzI2ODI=", "number": 250, "title": "Setup some issue templates", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-05-04T01:49:07Z", "updated_at": "2018-05-04T01:49:07Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://twitter.com/left_pad/status/99216385740464537\r\n\r\nI like the idea of using these to help people understand some of the ways I want to use issues.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/250/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 326599525, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjY1OTk1MjU=", "number": 286, "title": "Database hash should include current datasette version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2018-05-25T17:03:42Z", "updated_at": "2018-05-25T17:07:36Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Right now deploying a new version of datasette doesn't invalidate existing URLs, so users may still see a cached copy of the old templates.\r\n\r\nWe can fix this by including the current datasette version in the input to the hash function (which currently just the database file contents).", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/286/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 326778161, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjY3NzgxNjE=", "number": 290, "title": "Consider increasing the default for num_sql_threads (currently 3)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-05-27T00:52:41Z", "updated_at": "2018-05-27T00:52:41Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I ran a very rough micro-benchmark on the new `num_sql_threads` config option (added in #285)\r\n\r\n datasette --config num_sql_threads:1 fivethirtyeight.db\r\n\r\nThen\r\n\r\n ab -n 100 -c 10 'http://127.0.0.1:8011/fivethirtyeight-2628db9/twitter-ratio%2Fsenators'\r\n\r\n| Number of threads | Requests/second |\r\n|---|---|\r\n| 1 | 4.57 |\r\n| 3 | 9.77 |\r\n| 10 | 13.53 |\r\n| 20 | 15.24 \r\n| 50 | 8.21 | \r\n\r\nThis was on my early 2018 OS X laptop. Need to benchmark in other common environments before making a decision on changing the default. That said, the default of 3 was a number I plucked out of thin air.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/290/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 312395790, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTU3OTA=", "number": 197, "title": "Ability to sort by more than one column", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-09T05:13:30Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split off from #189.\r\n\r\nI'd like to support \"sort by X descending, then by Y ascending if there are dupes for X\" as well. Suggested syntax for that:\r\n\r\n ?_sort_desc=X&_sort=Y\r\n\r\nwe currently only allow one argument to be sent. We should allow as many arguments as there are columns, for example:\r\n\r\n ?_sort=department&_sort_desc=precinct&_sort=age&_sort_desc=size", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/197/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 312396095, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTYwOTU=", "number": 198, "title": "Ability to sort with nulls last", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-09T05:15:40Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split off from #189\r\n\r\nHere's how to do that in SQL: https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight-2628db9?sql=select+rowid%2C+*+from+%5Bnfl-wide-receivers%2Fadvanced-historical%5D%0D%0Aorder+by+case+when+career_ranypa+is+null+then+1+else+0+end%2C+career_ranypa%2C+rowid\r\n\r\n order by case when career_ranypa is null then 1 else 0 end, career_ranypa", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/198/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 314771615, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTQ3NzE2MTU=", "number": 218, "title": "Support custom unit display in order to handle \"$10,000\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-16T18:39:31Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:38Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I tried to get Datasette to display `$10,000` using the new units support but we currently only display units as a suffix:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/10a34f995c70daa37a8a2aa02c3135a4b023a24c/datasette/app.py#L563-L572\r\n\r\nIt would be neat if there was a mechanism for specifying a custom unit display - maybe something like this:\r\n\r\n```\r\n{\r\n \"custom_units\": {\r\n \"us_dollar\": {\r\n \"unit\": \"us_dollar = [] = $\",\r\n \"format\": \"${:,}\"\r\n }\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/218/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 318490133, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMTg0OTAxMzM=", "number": 241, "title": "Default datasette logging format should be JSON", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-04-27T17:32:48Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-10T17:45:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Structured logs are better. Datasette should default to outputting it's HTTP access log lines as newline delimited JSON instead of the Sanic default format it uses at the moment.\r\n\r\nFor improved greppability these logs should have keys ordered in a consistent way. Python's JSON module can do this with ordered dictionaries.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/241/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 344654623, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzNDQ2NTQ2MjM=", "number": 347, "title": "Rename \"datasette package\" to \"datasette publish docker\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2018-07-26T00:42:46Z", "updated_at": "2018-07-26T00:42:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/347/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 400340905, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0MDAzNDA5MDU=", "number": 402, "title": "Use SQLITE_DBCONFIG_DEFENSIVE plus other recommendations from SQLite security docs", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-01-17T15:52:28Z", "updated_at": "2019-01-17T16:15:21Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Was just having a skim through the datasette source. Given that the vuln impacts shadow tables, wasn't sure whether these are also covered by the immutable flag. Latest release introduced a SQLITE_DBCONFIG_DEFENSIVE flag that they recommend setting: https://sqlite.org/security.html\r\n\r\nhttps://twitter.com/ignoredambience/status/1085926961413869568", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/402/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 288438570, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUyODg0Mzg1NzA=", "number": 179, "title": "More metadata options for template authors ", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2018-01-14T20:51:04Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-13T18:33:33Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "See this thread on Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/952637152797458432", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/179/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 275159710, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUyNzUxNTk3MTA=", "number": 128, "title": "Every visualization should have an \"embed\" button", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2017-11-19T13:38:13Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-13T18:33:51Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "At least for the first round of visualizations, any time you construct one using the UI the result should include an \"embed this\" button that returns source code to copy and paste\r\n\r\nThese examples should use unpkg.com (or similarl) urls with SRI hashes, eg https://www.srihash.org - and should load data from the datasette JSON API.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/128/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 275415799, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUyNzU0MTU3OTk=", "number": 137, "title": "Ability to combine multiple SQL queries on a single graph", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2017-11-20T16:26:57Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-13T18:33:51Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This would make visualizations significantly more powerful. The interesting challenge will be around the URL design. It would be useful to be able to combine either multiple explicit SQL queries or multiple queries based on the filter string parameters passed to one or more table views.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/137/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 275755475, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUyNzU3NTU0NzU=", "number": 140, "title": "Heatmap visualization plugin", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2017-11-21T15:34:23Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-13T18:33:51Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Could use https://github.com/scottbedard/svelte-heatmap", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/140/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 346027040, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzNDYwMjcwNDA=", "number": 355, "title": "Table view should support filtering via many-to-many relationships", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2018-07-31T04:04:16Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-23T06:04:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Parent: #354 ", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/355/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 447451492, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDc0NTE0OTI=", "number": 484, "title": "Mechanism for displaying summary of m2m relationships in rows on table view", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-05-23T05:02:41Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-23T06:34:05Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Part of #354 (m2m support)\r\n\r\nIt would be fantastic if rows that are part of a m2m relationship could display it in an additional column in the table view.\r\n\r\nIt might look something like this: https://russian-ira-facebook-ads.datasettes.com/russian-ads-919cbfd/display_ads?_search=black+lives+matter\r\n\r\n\"russian-ads__display_ads__50_rows_where_where_search_matches__black_lives_matter_\"\r\n\r\nThat example [was achieved](https://github.com/simonw/russian-ira-facebook-ads-datasette/blob/daf51a8c50a78e8bc7971c211005fd85e66ccf64/russian-ads-metadata.yaml#L72-L77) using a custom SQL query and [datasette-json-html](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-json-html) - but I'd like this to be a built-in feature instead.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/484/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 449445715, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk0NDU3MTU=", "number": 491, "title": "Figure out how to use Firebase with cloudrun to enable vanity URLs and CDN caching", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2019-05-28T19:48:06Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-28T19:48:35Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It looks like Firebase can solve a couple of problems with the existing `datasette publish cloudrun` hosting mechanism:\r\n\r\n* The URLs it produces aren't pretty enough. Firebase offers more control over vanity URLs.\r\n* CDN caching (as seen in `datasette publish now`) is great for improving performance and saving money on Cloud Run execution time.\r\n\r\nhttps://firebase.google.com/docs/hosting/cloud-run looks like it can help with both of these.\r\n\r\nLots of interesting questions:\r\n\r\n* Should this be a new `datasette publish firebase` command or should it instead be implemented as additional custom options to `datasette publish cloudrun`?\r\n* How much harder does it become to do account setup?\r\n* How much will this option cost users?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/491/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 447408527, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NDc0MDg1Mjc=", "number": 483, "title": "Option to facet by date using month or year", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2019-05-23T01:25:29Z", "updated_at": "2019-05-29T21:38:27Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Facet by date (from #481) can take datetimes and facet them by the day component.\r\n\r\nhttps://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_facet_date=created\r\n\r\nI'd like to also be able to facet by month or year.\r\n\r\nI'm not sure what the best way to achieve this is. Could be two more Facet classes (YearFacet and MonthFacet) but I think it might be nicer if the existing DateFacet could take an optional argument that changed its behaviour. But... if I do that, do I expose it in the UI somewhere or is it only available to URL-hackers?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/483/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 459469278, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk0NjkyNzg=", "number": 515, "title": "Try shrinking official image with docker-slim", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2019-06-22T12:25:37Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-22T12:25:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This looks really promising: https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim\r\n\r\nIf it can shave substantial size from our official container reliably we could add it to the automated build process.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/515/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 460095928, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NjAwOTU5Mjg=", "number": 528, "title": "Establish a pattern for Datasette plugins built on top of Pandas", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2019-06-24T21:05:52Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-24T21:05:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The Pandas ecosystem is huge, varied and full of tools that are really good at doing interesting analysis on top of tabular data.\r\n\r\nPandas should not be a dependency of Datasette core, but I think there is a lot of potential in having plugins which use Pandas to apply interesting analysis to data sucked out of Datasette's SQLite tables.\r\n\r\nOne example ([thanks, Tony](https://twitter.com/psychemedia/status/1143259809715752962)): https://github.com/ResidentMario/missingno could form the basis of a fantastic plugin for getting a high-level overview of how complete each column in a table is.\r\n\r\nSome thought is needed here about what shape these kind of plugins might take, and what plugin hooks they would use.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/528/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 459622390, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk2MjIzOTA=", "number": 522, "title": "Handle case-insensitive headers in a nicer way", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-06-23T21:56:34Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-26T18:48:53Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Spun out from https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/518#discussion_r296486289", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/522/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 327365110, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjczNjUxMTA=", "number": 294, "title": "inspect should record column types", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2018-05-29T15:10:41Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-28T16:45:28Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "For each table we want to know the columns, their order and what type they are.\r\n\r\nI'm going to break with SQLite defaults a little on this one and allow datasette to define additional types - to start with just a `geometry` type for columns that are detected as SpatiaLite geometries.\r\n\r\nPossible JSON design:\r\n\r\n \"columns\": [{\r\n \"name\": \"title\",\r\n \"type\": \"text\"\r\n }, ...]\r\n\r\nRefs #276", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/294/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 327395270, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzMjczOTUyNzA=", "number": 296, "title": "Per-database and per-table /-/ URL namespace", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2018-05-29T16:23:13Z", "updated_at": "2019-06-28T16:46:34Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Initially this will be for subsets of `/-/inspect` and `/-/metadata` but it will also give us a URL namespace for future features like `/-/facet` (expanded list of a specific facet, linked to from `...`) and `/-/graph`\r\n\r\nTo start:\r\n\r\n* `/dbname/-/inspect`\r\n* `/dbname/-/metadata`\r\n* `/dbname/tablename/-/inspect`\r\n* `/dbname/tablename/-/metadata`\r\n\r\nThis means we will no longer allow databases or tables to have the name `\"-\"` - I think that's OK\r\n\r\nWe will continue to support rows with a primary key of `\"-\"` at the following URL:\r\n\r\n* `/dbname/tablename/-`", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/296/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 465019882, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMTk4ODI=", "number": 552, "title": "Add --plugin-secret support to \"datasette package\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-07-08T01:46:47Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-08T01:47:30Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Split out from #544.\r\n\r\nI think I should combine this with #347 (renaming `datasette package` to `datasette publish docker`).", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/552/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 465327844, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ=", "number": 553, "title": "Potential improvements to facet-by-date", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-07-08T15:37:53Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-08T15:41:55Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter:\r\n\r\nhttps://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696\r\n> I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created \u2026 isn't all that helpful!\r\n\r\nScreenshot of that link:\r\n\r\n\"django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows\"\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 462117311, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NjIxMTczMTE=", "number": 531, "title": "/database/-/inspect", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-06-28T16:33:41Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-08T15:43:57Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Build `/database/-/inspect` which shows tables, columns, column types and foreign keys\r\n\r\nIt won't show table counts. Or maybe it will include them optionally but only for `-i` databases, in a special area of the JSON reserved for immutable-only inspect details.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/465#issuecomment-506797086_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/531/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 456569067, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1NjkwNjc=", "number": 510, "title": "Ability to facet by delimiter (e.g. comma separated fields)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-06-15T19:34:41Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-08T15:44:51Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "E.g. if a field contains \"Tags,With,Commas\" be able to facet them in the same way as `_facet_array=` lets you facet `[\"Tags\", \"With\", \"Commas\"]`", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/510/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 465003070, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMDMwNzA=", "number": 551, "title": "Ship many-to-many faceting support (and facet-by-delimiter)", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2019-07-07T23:11:45Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-08T15:45:23Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/551/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 463544206, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NjM1NDQyMDY=", "number": 537, "title": "Populate \"endpoint\" key in ASGI scope", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2019-07-03T04:54:47Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-22T06:03:18Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This is a trick used by Starlette so that other layers of ASGI middleware can see which route was selected.\r\n\r\nThey added it here: https://github.com/encode/starlette/commit/34d0097feb6f057bd050d5057df5a2f96b97384e\r\n\r\nIf Datasette supports it as well we can benefit from it if we integrate this sentry_asgi middleware (probably as a `datasette-sentry` plugin): https://github.com/encode/sentry-asgi/blob/c6a42d44d31f85885b79e4ee898683ecf8104971/sentry_asgi/middleware.py#L34-L35", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 488874815, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0ODg4NzQ4MTU=", "number": 5, "title": "Write tests that simulate the Twitter API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-09-03T23:55:35Z", "updated_at": "2019-09-03T23:56:28Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I can use betamax for this: https://pypi.org/project/betamax/", "repo": {"value": 206156866, "label": "twitter-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/5/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 481885279, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0ODE4ODUyNzk=", "number": 569, "title": "More advanced connection pooling", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-08-17T13:20:41Z", "updated_at": "2019-10-02T22:44:37Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "We need a much smarter way of handling database connections.\r\n\r\nToday, connections are simple: Datasette runs a number of threads (defaults to 3) and each thread gets a threadlocal read-only (or immutable) connection to each attached database - opened on demand.\r\n\r\nFor Datasette Library (#417) I want to support potentially hundreds of attached databases. Datasette Edit (#567) is going to introduce a need for writable connections too.\r\n\r\nI'd also like to be able to run joins across multiple databases (#283) which further complicates things.\r\n\r\nSupporting thousands of open SQLite connections at once feels like it won't provide good enough performance (though I should benchmark that to be sure). Some kind of connection pooling is likely to be necessary.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/569/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 503053243, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMwNTMyNDM=", "number": 582, "title": "Datasette should not completely crash if one SQLite database is malformed", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2019-10-06T05:11:43Z", "updated_at": "2019-10-06T05:11:43Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "If you run Datasette against a number of database files and one of them is malformed, you get this 500 error on the index page:\r\n\r\n\"Error_500\"\r\n\r\nIt would be better if Datasette still worked and listed the databases that were NOT malformed, then showed an inline error message just for the one that could not be accessed.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/582/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 505673645, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MDU2NzM2NDU=", "number": 16, "title": "Do a better job with archived direct message threads", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2019-10-11T06:55:21Z", "updated_at": "2019-10-11T06:55:27Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/blob/fb2698086d766e0333a55bb73435e7283feeb438/twitter_to_sqlite/archive.py#L98-L99", "repo": {"value": 206156866, "label": "twitter-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/16/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 516874735, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MTY4NzQ3MzU=", "number": 613, "title": "Basic join support for table view", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-11-03T19:12:53Z", "updated_at": "2019-11-03T19:14:01Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I think it would be possible to support basic foreign key joins on the table page.\r\n\r\nThe user could specify columns that should result in a join (from a set of suggestions similar to how facets work right now) and they could then be passed as `?_join=city_id` arguments.\r\n\r\nThis feature will make a lot of sense when combined with the ability to show / hide / customize columns, see #292", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/613/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 501773982, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzIzOTgzNzMy", "number": 579, "title": "New connection pooling", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-10-02T23:22:19Z", "updated_at": "2019-11-15T22:57:21Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/579", "body": "See #569", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/579/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null} {"id": 464987783, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjk1MTI3MjEz", "number": 546, "title": "Facet by delimiter", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2019-07-07T20:06:05Z", "updated_at": "2019-11-18T23:46:01Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/546", "body": "Refs #510", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/546/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null} {"id": 530468212, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MzA0NjgyMTI=", "number": 643, "title": "Set up some basic benchmarks as part of the unit tests", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2019-11-29T19:24:19Z", "updated_at": "2019-11-29T19:24:19Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://pypi.org/project/pytest-benchmark/ looks great for this.\r\n\r\nHere's how to run it as a github action: https://github.com/rhysd/github-action-benchmark/blob/master/examples/pytest/README.md", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/643/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 559964149, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NTk5NjQxNDk=", "number": 665, "title": "Introduce a SQL statement parser in Python", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-02-04T20:36:05Z", "updated_at": "2020-02-04T20:36:48Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "#254 and #653 are both examples of problems that could be solved using a real SQL parser in Python.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/665/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 574035432, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NzQwMzU0MzI=", "number": 692, "title": "is_hidden_table context variable on table.html page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-03-02T15:03:25Z", "updated_at": "2020-03-02T15:03:48Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It's useful to know if a table is hidden when rendering that page. `datasette-configure-fts` for example may want to disallow enabling search on hidden tables.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/692/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 565064079, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzc1MTgwODMy", "number": 672, "title": "--dirs option for scanning directories for SQLite databases", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 15, "created_at": "2020-02-14T02:25:52Z", "updated_at": "2020-03-27T01:03:53Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": "simonw/datasette/pulls/672", "body": "Refs #417.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/672/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null} {"id": 593006814, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1OTMwMDY4MTQ=", "number": 715, "title": "Refactor duplicate cell display logic", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-04-03T00:58:11Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-03T00:58:11Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The logic for rendering cells in table view and in database (or canned query) view is currently very similar:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7656fd64d8b6a32ebc34d89c1b8711cc5ea240f7/datasette/views/base.py#L514-L539\r\n\r\nCompared with:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7656fd64d8b6a32ebc34d89c1b8711cc5ea240f7/datasette/views/table.py#L104-L195\r\n\r\nI'll be changing this a bit in #698 but I should still try to clean this up more further in the future.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/715/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 599776345, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1OTk3NzYzNDU=", "number": 24, "title": "Feature idea: github-to-sqlite everything ...", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-04-14T18:34:00Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-14T18:34:00Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "At the moment if you want to pull all your repos, issues, issues comments etc you have to do it with a sequence of separate commands.\r\n\r\nConsider adding a `everything` or `all` command which fetches everything that the tool knows how to fetch, and is designed to be run on a cron in a way that fetches just new stuff each time.", "repo": {"value": 207052882, "label": "github-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/24/reactions\", \"total_count\": 7, \"+1\": 7, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 530491074, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MzA0OTEwNzQ=", "number": 14, "title": "Command for importing events", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2019-11-29T21:28:58Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-14T19:38:34Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Eg from https://api.github.com/users/simonw/events\r\n\r\nDocs here: https://developer.github.com/v3/activity/events/#list-events-performed-by-a-user", "repo": {"value": 207052882, "label": "github-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/14/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 602619330, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MDI2MTkzMzA=", "number": 45, "title": "Use raise_for_status() everywhere", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-04-19T04:38:28Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-19T04:39:22Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I keep seeing errors which I think are caused by authentication or rate limit problems but which appear to be unexpected JSON responses - presumably because they are actually an error message.\r\n\r\nRecent example: https://github.com/simonw/jsk-fellows-on-twitter/runs/598892575\r\n\r\nUsing `response.raise_for_status()` everywhere will make these errors less confusing.", "repo": {"value": 206156866, "label": "twitter-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/45/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 606033104, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MDYwMzMxMDQ=", "number": 12, "title": "If less than 500MB, show size in MB not GB", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-04-24T04:35:01Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-24T04:35:25Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Just saw this:\r\n```\r\nUploading 0.05 GB\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/12/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 607888367, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MDc4ODgzNjc=", "number": 13, "title": "Also upload movie files", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-04-27T22:11:25Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-28T00:39:45Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `upload` command currently only handles static images:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/dogsheep/photos-to-sqlite/blob/d939455af00e07866686457ee2fcb9b2d1b7194e/photos_to_sqlite/utils.py#L26-L33\r\n\r\nNeed to cover movies taken by my phone and DSLR too.", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/13/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 608512747, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MDg1MTI3NDc=", "number": 14, "title": "Annotate photos using the Google Cloud Vision API", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2020-04-28T18:09:03Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-28T18:19:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It can detect faces, run OCR, do image labeling (it knows what a lemur is!) and do object localization where it identifies objects and returns bounding polygons for them.", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/14/reactions\", \"total_count\": 3, \"+1\": 2, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 1, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 602533300, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MDI1MzMzMDA=", "number": 1, "title": "Import photo metadata from Apple Photos into SQLite", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 5324096, "label": "Apple Photos online and securely browsable"}, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2020-04-18T19:23:26Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-04T02:41:40Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Faces, albums, locations, that kind of thing.", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/1/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 612287234, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MTIyODcyMzQ=", "number": 16, "title": "Import machine-learning detected labels (dog, llama etc) from Apple Photos", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 13, "created_at": "2020-05-05T02:45:43Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-05T05:38:16Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Follow-on from #1. Apple Photos runs some very sophisticated machine learning on-device to figure out if photos are of dogs, llamas and so on. I really want to extract those labels out into my own database.", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/16/reactions\", \"total_count\": 2, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 1, \"hooray\": 1, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 612860758, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MTI4NjA3NTg=", "number": 18, "title": "Switch CI solution to GitHub Actions with a macOS runner", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-05-05T20:03:50Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-05T23:49:18Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Refs #17.", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/18/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 613422636, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0MjI2MzY=", "number": 760, "title": "Way of seeing full schema for a database", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-05-06T15:46:08Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-06T23:49:06Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I find myself wanting to quickly figure out all of the BLOB columns in a database.\r\n\r\nA `/-/schema` page showing the full schema (actually since it's per-database probably `/dbname/-/schema` or `/-/schema/dbname`) would be really handy.\r\n\r\nIt would need to be carefully constructed from various queries against `sqlite_master` - just doing `select * from sqlite_master where type='table'` isn't quite enough because I also want to show indexes, triggers etc.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/760/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 613491342, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0OTEzNDI=", "number": 762, "title": "Experiment with PRAGMA hard_heap_limit ", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-05-06T17:33:23Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-07T03:08:44Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This was added in SQLite 2020-01-22 (3.31.0): https://www.sqlite.org/changes.html#version_3_31_0\r\n\r\n> Add the [sqlite3_hard_heap_limit64()](https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/hard_heap_limit64.html) interface and the corresponding [PRAGMA hard_heap_limit](https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_hard_heap_limit) command. \r\n\r\nThis sounds like it could be a nice extra safety measure.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/762/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 616087149, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MTYwODcxNDk=", "number": 765, "title": "publish heroku should default to currently tagged version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-05-11T18:24:06Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-11T18:25:43Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Had a report that deploying to Heroku was using the previously installed version of Datasette, not the latest.\r\n\r\nCould be because of this:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/af6c6c5d6f929f951c0e63bfd1c82e37a071b50f/datasette/publish/heroku.py#L172-L179\r\n\r\nHeroku documentation recommends pinning to specific versions https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-pip\r\n\r\nSo... we could ensure we default to an install value of `[\"datasette>=current_tag\"]`.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/765/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 615626118, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MTU2MjYxMTg=", "number": 22, "title": "Try out ExifReader", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2020-05-11T06:32:13Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-14T05:59:53Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://pypi.org/project/ExifReader/\r\n\r\nNew fork that should be able to handle EXIF in HEIC files.\r\n\r\nForked here: https://github.com/ianare/exif-py/issues/102#issuecomment-626376522\r\n\r\nRefs #3 ", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 621323348, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjEzMjMzNDg=", "number": 24, "title": "Configurable URL for images", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-05-19T22:25:56Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-20T06:00:29Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This is hard-coded at the moment, which is bad:\r\nhttps://github.com/dogsheep/photos-to-sqlite/blob/d5d69b9019703c47bc251444838578dd752801e2/photos_to_sqlite/cli.py#L269-L272", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/24/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 621486115, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjE0ODYxMTU=", "number": 27, "title": "photos_with_apple_metadata view should include labels", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-05-20T06:06:17Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-20T06:06:17Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://dogsheep-photos.dogsheep.net/public/photos_with_apple_metadata?place_city=New+Orleans&_facet=place_city&_facet_array=albums&_facet_array=persons\r\n\r\nHere's one way to add that:\r\n```sql\r\n select\r\n rowid,\r\n photo,\r\n (\r\n select\r\n json_group_array(\r\n json_object(\r\n 'label',\r\n normalized_string,\r\n 'href',\r\n '/photos/labelled?_hide_sql=1&label=' || normalized_string\r\n )\r\n )\r\n from\r\n labels\r\n where\r\n labels.uuid = photos_with_apple_metadata.uuid\r\n ) as labels,\r\n date,\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 256834907, "label": "dogsheep-photos"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/27/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 626582657, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjY1ODI2NTc=", "number": 779, "title": "Make human_description_en explicitly available to output renderers", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-05-28T14:59:54Z", "updated_at": "2020-05-28T14:59:54Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "`datasette-atom` uses this:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette-atom/blob/df98a6c43a443224b6cd232f84703ec297ef046b/datasette_atom/__init__.py#L36-L37\r\n```python\r\n if data.get(\"human_description_en\"):\r\n title += \": \" + data[\"human_description_en\"]\r\n```\r\nIt's a nice way to generate a useful title for a filtered table.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/779/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 628156527, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjgxNTY1Mjc=", "number": 789, "title": "Mechanism for enabling pluggy tracing", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-06-01T05:10:14Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-01T05:11:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Could be useful for debugging plugins: https://pluggy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#call-tracing\r\n\r\nI tried this out by adding these two lines in `plugins.py`:\r\n```python\r\npm = pluggy.PluginManager(\"datasette\")\r\npm.add_hookspecs(hookspecs)\r\n# Added these:\r\npm.trace.root.setwriter(print)\r\npm.enable_tracing()\r\n```\r\nOutput looked something like this:\r\n```\r\nINFO: 127.0.0.1:52724 - \"GET /-/-/static/app.css HTTP/1.1\" 404 Not Found\r\n actor_from_request [hook]\r\n datasette: \r\n request: \r\n\r\n finish actor_from_request --> [] [hook]\r\n\r\n extra_body_script [hook]\r\n template: show_json.html\r\n database: None\r\n table: None\r\n view_name: json_data\r\n datasette: \r\n\r\n finish extra_body_script --> [] [hook]\r\n\r\n extra_template_vars [hook]\r\n template: show_json.html\r\n database: None\r\n table: None\r\n view_name: json_data\r\n request: \r\n datasette: \r\n\r\n finish extra_template_vars --> [] [hook]\r\n\r\n extra_css_urls [hook]\r\n template: show_json.html\r\n database: None\r\n table: None\r\n datasette: \r\n\r\n finish extra_css_urls --> [] [hook]\r\n\r\n extra_js_urls [hook]\r\n template: show_json.html\r\n database: None\r\n table: None\r\n datasette: \r\n\r\n finish extra_js_urls --> [] [hook]\r\n\r\nINFO: 127.0.0.1:52724 - \"GET /-/actor HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\r\n actor_from_request [hook]\r\n datasette: \r\n request: \r\n\r\n finish actor_from_request --> [] [hook]\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/789/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 638238548, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MzgyMzg1NDg=", "number": 845, "title": "Code coverage should ignore files in .coveragerc", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-06-13T21:45:42Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-13T21:46:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm not sure why this is, but the code coverage I have running in a GitHub Action doesn't take my `.coveragerc` file into account. It should:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cf7a2bdb404734910ec07abc7571351a2d934828/.github/workflows/test-coverage.yml#L31-L35\r\n\r\nHere's the bit that's ignored:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cf7a2bdb404734910ec07abc7571351a2d934828/.coveragerc#L1-L2\r\n\r\nAs a result my coverage score is 84%, when it should be 92%:\r\n```\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4404252Z ----------- coverage: platform linux, python 3.8.3-final-0 -----------\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4404570Z Name Stmts Miss Cover\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4404971Z --------------------------------------------------------\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4405227Z datasette/__init__.py 3 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4405441Z datasette/__main__.py 3 3 0%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4405668Z datasette/_version.py 279 279 0%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4405921Z datasette/actor_auth_cookie.py 20 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4406135Z datasette/app.py 499 27 95%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4406343Z datasette/cli.py 162 45 72%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4406553Z datasette/database.py 236 17 93%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4406761Z datasette/default_permissions.py 40 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4406975Z datasette/facets.py 210 24 89%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4407186Z datasette/filters.py 122 7 94%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4407394Z datasette/hookspecs.py 34 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4407600Z datasette/inspect.py 36 23 36%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4407807Z datasette/plugins.py 34 6 82%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4408014Z datasette/publish/__init__.py 0 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4408240Z datasette/publish/cloudrun.py 57 2 96%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4408786Z datasette/publish/common.py 19 1 95%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4409029Z datasette/publish/heroku.py 97 13 87%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4409243Z datasette/renderer.py 63 4 94%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4409450Z datasette/sql_functions.py 5 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4410480Z datasette/tracer.py 87 16 82%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4410972Z datasette/utils/__init__.py 504 31 94%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4411755Z datasette/utils/asgi.py 264 24 91%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4412173Z datasette/utils/shutil_backport.py 44 44 0%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4412822Z datasette/version.py 4 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4413562Z datasette/views/__init__.py 0 0 100%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4414276Z datasette/views/base.py 288 19 93%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4414579Z datasette/views/database.py 120 2 98%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4414860Z datasette/views/index.py 57 2 96%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4415379Z datasette/views/special.py 72 16 78%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4418994Z datasette/views/table.py 418 18 96%\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4428811Z --------------------------------------------------------\r\n2020-06-13T21:41:18.4430394Z TOTAL 3777 623 84%\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/845/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 574021194, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NzQwMjExOTQ=", "number": 691, "title": "--reload sould reload server if code in --plugins-dir changes", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-03-02T14:42:21Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-14T02:35:17Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/691/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 639993467, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2Mzk5OTM0Njc=", "number": 850, "title": "Proof of concept for Datasette on AWS Lambda with EFS", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 25, "created_at": "2020-06-16T21:48:31Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-16T23:52:16Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2020/06/aws-lambda-support-for-amazon-elastic-file-system-now-generally-/\r\n\r\nIf Datasette can run on Lambda with access to EFS it could both read AND write large databases there.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/850/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 348043884, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWUzNDgwNDM4ODQ=", "number": 357, "title": "Plugin hook for loading metadata.json", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2018-08-06T19:00:01Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-21T22:19:58Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "For https://github.com/simonw/russian-ira-facebook-ads-datasette/tree/af6d956995e14afd585c35a6a06bb01da32043ba I wrote a script to convert YAML to JSON because YAML is a better format for embedding multi-line HTML descriptions and canned SQL statements.\r\n\r\nExample yaml metadata file: https://github.com/simonw/russian-ira-facebook-ads-datasette/blob/af6d956995e14afd585c35a6a06bb01da32043ba/russian-ads-metadata.yaml\r\n\r\nIt would be useful if Datasette could be fed a YAML file directly:\r\n\r\n datasette -m metadata.yaml\r\n\r\nQuestion is... should this be a native feature (hence adding a YAML dependency) or should it be handled by a `datasette-metadata-yaml` plugin, using a new plugin hook for loading metadata? If so, what would other use-cases for that plugin hook be?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/357/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 643510821, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDM1MTA4MjE=", "number": 862, "title": "Set an upper limit on total facet suggestion time for a page", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-06-23T03:57:55Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-23T03:58:48Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "If a table has 100 columns the facet suggestion code will currently run 100 times, taking a max of `facet_suggest_time_limit_ms` which defaults to 50ms per column:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/000528192eaf891118932250141dabe7a1561ece/datasette/facets.py#L142-L162\r\n\r\nSo for 100 columns, that's 100 * 50ms = 5s total time that might be spent attempting to calculate facets on a large table!\r\n\r\nI should implement a hard upper limit on the total amount of time taken suggesting facets - probably of around 500ms. If it takes longer than that the remaining columns will not be considered.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/862/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 644161221, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDQxNjEyMjE=", "number": 117, "title": "Support for compound (composite) foreign keys", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-06-23T21:33:42Z", "updated_at": "2020-06-23T21:40:31Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It turns out SQLite supports composite foreign keys: https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_composite\r\n\r\nTheir example looks like this:\r\n```sql\r\nCREATE TABLE album(\r\n albumartist TEXT,\r\n albumname TEXT,\r\n albumcover BINARY,\r\n PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname)\r\n);\r\n\r\nCREATE TABLE song(\r\n songid INTEGER,\r\n songartist TEXT,\r\n songalbum TEXT,\r\n songname TEXT,\r\n FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname)\r\n);\r\n```\r\n\r\nHere's what that looks like in sqlite-utils:\r\n\r\n```\r\nIn [1]: import sqlite_utils \r\n\r\nIn [2]: import sqlite3 \r\n\r\nIn [3]: conn = sqlite3.connect(\":memory:\") \r\n\r\nIn [4]: conn \r\nOut[4]: \r\n\r\nIn [5]: conn.executescript(\"\"\" \r\n ...: CREATE TABLE album( \r\n ...: albumartist TEXT, \r\n ...: albumname TEXT, \r\n ...: albumcover BINARY, \r\n ...: PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname) \r\n ...: ); \r\n ...: \r\n ...: CREATE TABLE song( \r\n ...: songid INTEGER, \r\n ...: songartist TEXT, \r\n ...: songalbum TEXT, \r\n ...: songname TEXT, \r\n ...: FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname) \r\n ...: ); \r\n ...: \"\"\") \r\nOut[5]: \r\n\r\nIn [6]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn) \r\n\r\nIn [7]: db.tables \r\nOut[7]: \r\n[,\r\n
]\r\n\r\nIn [8]: db.tables[0].foreign_keys \r\nOut[8]: []\r\n\r\nIn [9]: db.tables[1].foreign_keys \r\nOut[9]: \r\n[ForeignKey(table='song', column='songartist', other_table='album', other_column='albumartist'),\r\n ForeignKey(table='song', column='songalbum', other_table='album', other_column='albumname')]\r\n```\r\nThe table appears to have two separate foreign keys, when actually it has a single compound composite foreign key.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 648659536, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDg2NTk1MzY=", "number": 881, "title": "Figure out why restore_working_directory is needed in some places", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-07-01T04:19:25Z", "updated_at": "2020-07-01T04:19:25Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This is a frustrating workaround. I have a `restore_working_directory` fixture that I wrote to solve errors that look like this:\r\n```\r\n/Users/simon/Dropbox/Development/datasette/tests/test_publish_cloudrun.py:148: \r\n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\r\n/usr/local/opt/python/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/contextlib.py:112: in __enter__\r\n return next(self.gen)\r\n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\r\n\r\nself = \r\n\r\n @contextlib.contextmanager\r\n def isolated_filesystem(self):\r\n \"\"\"A context manager that creates a temporary folder and changes\r\n the current working directory to it for isolated filesystem tests.\r\n \"\"\"\r\n> cwd = os.getcwd()\r\nE FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory\r\n```\r\nHere's an example of it in use: removing the `restore_working_directory` argument from this function causes the failure. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/549b1c2063db48c4622ee5c7b478a1e3cbc1ac07/tests/test_plugins.py#L689-L690\r\n\r\nI'd like to not have to do this.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/881/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 632724154, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MzI3MjQxNTQ=", "number": 805, "title": "Writable canned queries live demo on Glitch", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 11, "created_at": "2020-06-06T20:52:13Z", "updated_at": "2020-07-01T22:44:01Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Needs to run somewhere with a mutable disk drive, so not Cloud Run or Heroku or Vercel.\r\n\r\nI think I'll put it on Glitch.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/805/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 659873662, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NTk4NzM2NjI=", "number": 898, "title": "datasette.utils.testing module", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-07-18T03:53:24Z", "updated_at": "2020-07-18T03:57:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The unit tests for plugins could benefit from reusing code from Datasette's own testing fixtures, e.g.:\r\n> I may need to borrow this function from Datasette for the tests:\r\n> https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1f6a134369e6a7efaae9db469f15b1dd2b7f3709/tests/fixtures.py#L836-L851\r\n> \r\n> It's not importable (it lives in `fixtures.py` and not in the `datasette` package that gets packaged for PyPI) - maybe I should fix that in Datasette by adding a `from datasette.utils.testing` module.\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-update-api/issues/4#issuecomment-660419182_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/898/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 668064026, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NjgwNjQwMjY=", "number": 911, "title": "Rethink the --name option to \"datasette publish\"", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-07-29T18:49:49Z", "updated_at": "2020-07-29T18:49:49Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "`--name` works inconsistently across the different publish providers - on Cloud Run you should use `--service` instead for example. Need to review it across all of them and either remove it or clarify what it does.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/911/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 673602857, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NzM2MDI4NTc=", "number": 9, "title": "Define a view that displays photos correctly", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-08-05T14:53:39Z", "updated_at": "2020-08-05T14:53:39Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `photos` table stores data like this:\r\n\r\nid | createdAt | source | prefix | suffix | width | height | visibility | created\u00a0\u25b2 | user\r\n-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --\r\n5e12c9708506bc000840262a | January 06, 2020 - 05:45:20 UTC | Swarm for iOS\u00a01 | https://fastly.4sqi.net/img/general/ | /15889193_AXxGk4I1nbzUZuyYqObgbXdJNyEHiwj6AUDq0tPZWtw.jpg | 1920 | 1440 | public | 2020-01-06T05:45:20 | 15889193\r\n\r\nThe photo URL can be derived from those pieces - define a SQL view which does that (using `datasette-json-html` to display the pictures)", "repo": {"value": 205429375, "label": "swarm-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/swarm-to-sqlite/issues/9/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 675594325, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NzU1OTQzMjU=", "number": 917, "title": "Idea: \"datasette publish\" option for \"only if the data has changed", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-08-08T21:58:27Z", "updated_at": "2020-08-08T21:58:27Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "This is a pattern I often find myself needing. I usually implement this in GitHub Actions like this:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/covid-19-datasette/blob/efa01c39abc832b8641fc2a92840cc3acae2fb08/.github/workflows/scheduled.yml#L52-L63\r\n\r\n```yaml\r\n - name: Set variables to decide if we should deploy\r\n id: decide_variables\r\n run: |-\r\n echo \"##[set-output name=latest;]$(datasette inspect covid.db | jq '.covid.hash' -r)\"\r\n echo \"##[set-output name=deployed;]$(curl -s https://covid-19.datasettes.com/-/databases.json | jq '.[0].hash' -r)\"\r\n - name: Set up Cloud Run\r\n if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' || steps.decide_variables.outputs.latest != steps.decide_variables.outputs.deployed\r\n uses: GoogleCloudPlatform/github-actions/setup-gcloud@master\r\n```\r\nThis is pretty fiddly. It might be good for `datasette publish` to grow a helper option that does effectively this - hashes the databases (and the `metadata.json`) and compares them to the deployed version.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/917/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 647095487, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDcwOTU0ODc=", "number": 873, "title": "\"datasette -p 0 --root\" gives the wrong URL", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 14, "created_at": "2020-06-29T04:03:06Z", "updated_at": "2020-08-18T17:26:10Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "```\r\n$ datasette -p 0 --root\r\nhttp://127.0.0.1:0/-/auth-token?token=2d498c...\r\n```\r\nThe port is incorrect.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/873/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 687694947, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2ODc2OTQ5NDc=", "number": 954, "title": "Remove old register_output_renderer dict mechanism in Datasette 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-08-28T04:04:23Z", "updated_at": "2020-08-28T04:56:31Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> Documentation says that the old dictionary mechanism will be deprecated by 1.0:\r\n> \r\n> https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/799ecae94824640bdff21f86997f69844048d5c3/docs/plugin_hooks.rst#L460\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/953#issuecomment-682312494_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/954/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 689848827, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2ODk4NDg4Mjc=", "number": 6, "title": "ISO timestamps", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-01T06:16:42Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-01T06:16:42Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `time_added`, `time_updated` and `time_read` columns currently store data like this:\r\n\r\n September 19, 2019 - 00:30:30 UTC\r\n\r\nShould use ISO instead, e.g. `2020-07-26T01:05:24+00:00`", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/6/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 503243784, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMyNDM3ODQ=", "number": 3, "title": "Extract images into separate tables", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2019-10-07T05:43:01Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-01T06:17:45Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "As already done with authors. Slightly harder because images do not have a universally unique ID. Also need to figure out what to do about there being columns for both `image` and `images`.\r\n\r\n\"memory__items\"\r\n", "repo": {"value": 213286752, "label": "pocket-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/3/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 689850810, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2ODk4NTA4MTA=", "number": 6, "title": "Set up a demo instance", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-01T06:20:24Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-01T06:20:24Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Once I've got the Datasette plugin to a state where it's worth building a demo: #3\r\n\r\nI can use data from my public https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/ demo plus the Pocket data subset I use for the demo in https://github.com/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/5 - I could pull in the https://dogsheep-photos.dogsheep.net/ photos data too.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/6/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 691537426, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTE1Mzc0MjY=", "number": 959, "title": "Internals API idea: results.dicts in addition to results.rows", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-03T00:50:17Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-03T00:50:17Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I just wrote this code:\r\n```python\r\n results = await database.execute(SEARCH_SQL, {\"query\": query})\r\n return [dict(r) for r in results.rows]\r\n```\r\nHow about having `results.dicts` as a utility property that does that?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/959/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 692202408, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTIyMDI0MDg=", "number": 12, "title": "Idea: maps and GeoJSON support", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-03T18:47:10Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-04T01:45:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It would be cool if the `display_sql` could return a column populated with GeoJSON which would the automatically be displayed on a map in the results (or maybe default JS would look for a `class=\"geojson\"` element output by the `display` template) - ala https://github.com/simonw/datasette-leaflet-geojson\r\n\r\nThen I could render workout routes on a map, or Swarm checkin points.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/12/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 695441530, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU0NDE1MzA=", "number": 154, "title": "OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-09-07T23:42:44Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-07T23:47:10Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I'm getting this error when running:\r\n\r\n sqlite-utils enable-wal beta.db\r\n\r\n`OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction`\r\n\r\nI'm worried that maybe that's because of this new code from #152:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/deb2eb013ff85bbc828ebc244a9654f0d9c3139e/sqlite_utils/db.py#L128-L129", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/154/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 695553522, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU1NTM1MjI=", "number": 18, "title": "Deleted records stay in the search index", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-09-08T05:14:23Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-08T05:15:51Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Here's why: https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/blob/24f7898d41a39218058f174c75ba62f7c0fcfff6/dogsheep_beta/utils.py#L44-L53\r\n\r\nThat should probably do `DELETE FROM index1.search_index WHERE [table] = ?` first.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/18/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 695556681, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU1NTY2ODE=", "number": 19, "title": "Figure out incremental re-indexing", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-09-08T05:23:31Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-08T05:27:07Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "As tables get bigger reindexing everything on a schedule (essentially recreating the entire index from scratch) will start to become a performance bottleneck.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/19/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 696908389, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTY5MDgzODk=", "number": 961, "title": "Verification checks for metadata.json on startup", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-09-09T15:21:53Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-09T15:24:31Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I lost a bunch of time yesterday trying to figure out why a Datasette instance wasn't starting up - it turned out it was because I had a `facets:` reference that mentioned a column that did not exist.\r\n\r\nCatching these on startup would be good.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/961/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 649429772, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NDk0Mjk3NzI=", "number": 886, "title": "Reconsider how _actor_X magic parameter deals with missing values", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-07-02T00:00:38Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-11T21:35:26Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I had to build a custom `_actorornull` prefix for [datasette-saved-queries](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-saved-queries/blob/37c00e56ac398e1f9aa342d30357de013a9b37b4/datasette_saved_queries/__init__.py):\r\n```python\r\ndef actorornull(key, request):\r\n if request.actor is None:\r\n return None\r\n return request.actor.get(key)\r\n\r\n\r\n@hookimpl\r\ndef register_magic_parameters():\r\n return [\r\n (\"actorornull\", actorornull),\r\n ]\r\n```\r\nMaybe the `actor` magic in Datasette core should do that out of the box?\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/f1f581b7ffcd5d8f3ae6c1c654d813a6641410eb/datasette/default_magic_parameters.py#L14-L17\r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/886/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 703216044, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MDMyMTYwNDQ=", "number": 49, "title": "Feature: gists and starred gists", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-17T02:30:52Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-17T02:30:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://developer.github.com/v3/gists/#list-starred-gists", "repo": {"value": 207052882, "label": "github-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/49/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 703218448, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MDMyMTg0NDg=", "number": 51, "title": "Documentation for twitter-to-sqlite fetch", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-17T02:38:10Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-17T02:38:10Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It's mentioned in passing in the README but it deserves its own section:\r\n```\r\n$ twitter-to-sqlite fetch \\\r\n \"https://api.twitter.com/1.1/account/verify_credentials.json\" \\\r\n | grep '\"id\"' | head -n 1\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 206156866, "label": "twitter-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/51/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 455852801, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU0NTU4NTI4MDE=", "number": 507, "title": "Every datasette plugin on the ecosystem page should have a screenshot", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2019-06-13T17:02:51Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-17T02:47:35Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/master/docs/ecosystem.rst", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/507/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 694136490, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTQxMzY0OTA=", "number": 15, "title": "Add a bunch of config examples", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-09-05T17:58:43Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-18T23:17:39Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I can bring these over from my personal Dogsheep.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/15/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 694493566, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2OTQ0OTM1NjY=", "number": 16, "title": "Timeline view", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-09-06T19:13:58Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-21T02:42:29Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Ability to browse (and facet) by date.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/16/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 705215230, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MDUyMTUyMzA=", "number": 26, "title": "Pagination", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2020-09-21T00:14:37Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-21T02:55:54Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Useful for #16 (timeline view) since you can now filter to just the items on a specific day - but if there are more than 50 items you can't see them all.", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 688352145, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTIxNDU=", "number": 141, "title": "insert-files support for compressed values", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-08-28T20:59:46Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-24T20:36:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `sqlar` format supports this, it would be useful if `insert-files` could support this too.\r\n\r\nhttps://www.sqlite.org/sqlar.html", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/141/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 581795570, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1ODE3OTU1NzA=", "number": 93, "title": "Support more string values for types in .add_column()", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-03-15T19:32:49Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-24T20:36:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/2.4.2/python-api.html#adding-columns says:\r\n> SQLite types you can specify are \"TEXT\", \"INTEGER\", \"FLOAT\" or \"BLOB\".\r\n\r\nAs discovered in #92 this isn't the right list of values. I should expand this to match https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/93/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 652961907, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2NTI5NjE5MDc=", "number": 121, "title": "Improved (and better documented) support for transactions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-07-08T04:56:51Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-24T20:36:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/118#issuecomment-655283393_\r\n\r\nWe should put some thought into how this library supports and encourages smart use of transactions.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/121/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 709789634, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MDk3ODk2MzQ=", "number": 27, "title": "Sort order is not persisted by facet filter links", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-09-27T18:22:07Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-27T18:22:07Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "A link to `/-/beta?category=1×tamp__date=2018-08-01&q=swedish` should be to `/-/beta?category=1×tamp__date=2018-08-01&q=swedish&sort=newest`", "repo": {"value": 197431109, "label": "dogsheep-beta"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/27/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 712368432, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MTIzNjg0MzI=", "number": 984, "title": "Review accessibility of new column action menus", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-09-30T23:56:44Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-01T00:01:36Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Feature added in #981", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/984/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 626211658, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYyMTE2NTg=", "number": 778, "title": "Ability to configure keyset pagination for views and queries", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-05-28T04:48:56Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-02T02:26:25Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Currently views offer pagination, but it uses offset/limit - e.g. https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/paginated_view?_next=100\r\n\r\nThis means pagination will perform poorly on deeper pages.\r\n\r\nIf a view is based on a table that has a primary key it should be possible to configure efficient keyset pagination that works the same way that table pagination works.\r\n\r\nThis may be as simple as configuring a column that can be treated as a \"primary key\" for the purpose of pagination using `metadata.json` - or with a `?_view_pk=colname` querystring argument.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/778/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 718272593, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MTgyNzI1OTM=", "number": 1007, "title": "set-env and add-path commands have been deprecated", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-10-09T16:21:18Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-09T16:23:51Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.blog/changelog/2020-10-01-github-actions-deprecating-set-env-and-add-path-commands/\r\n\r\n> Starting today runner version 2.273.5 will begin to warn you if you use the `add-path` or `set-env` commands. We are monitoring telemetry for the usage of these commands and plan to fully disable them in the future.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1007/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 628572716, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjg1NzI3MTY=", "number": 791, "title": "Tutorial: building a something-interesting with writable canned queries", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2020-06-01T16:32:05Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-10T23:34:42Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Initial idea: TODO list, as a tutorial for #698 writable canned queries.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/791/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 718910318, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5MTAzMTg=", "number": 1015, "title": "Research: could Datasette install its own plugins?", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-10-11T19:33:06Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-11T19:35:04Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It would be cool if Datasette could offer a plugin browsing interface where users could install plugins by clicking \"Install\" on them - similar to how VS Code extensions work.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1015/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 718934942, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5MzQ5NDI=", "number": 1, "title": "Documentation on how to use this with Datasette", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-10-11T21:56:27Z", "updated_at": "2020-10-11T22:14:00Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "MEMBER", "pull_request": null, "body": "In particular how to use `datasette-render-images` to see the images.", "repo": {"value": 303218369, "label": "evernote-to-sqlite"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/1/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null}