issues: 1855885427
This data as json
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1855885427 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5unpBz | 2143 | De-tangling Metadata before Datasette 1.0 | 15178711 | open | 0 | 24 | 2023-08-18T00:51:50Z | 2023-08-24T18:28:27Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Metadata in Datasette is a really powerful feature, but is a bit difficult to work with. It was initially a way to add "metadata" about your "data" in Datasette instances, like descriptions for databases/tables/columns, titles, source URLs, licenses, etc. But it later became the go-to spot for other Datasette features that have nothing to do with metadata, like permissions/plugins/canned queries. Specifically, I've found the following problems when working with Datasette metadata:
Possible solutionsHere's a few ideas of Datasette core changes we can make to address these problems. Re-vamp the Datasette Python metadata APIsThe Datasette object has a single The (I'm a bit fuzzy on what to actually do here, but I imagine it'll be very small breaking changes to a few Python methods) Add an optional
|
107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2143/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |