issues: 423316403
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 423316403 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MjMzMTY0MDM= | 422 | Figure out what to do about table counts in a mutable world | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2019-03-20T15:27:15Z | 2019-05-02T05:43:11Z | 2019-05-02T05:43:11Z | OWNER | In moving away from the existing static inspect method (see #420 and #419) the biggest thing lost is full table row counts. These can be expensive against large tables, but currently Datasette runs the We can run those counts with a timelimit, but this means that for larger tables we won't be able to show a count at all, which is disappointing. Is there a way we can find an approximate or lower bound count for a table? |
107914493 | issue | {
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/422/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
completed |