home / github / issues

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issues: 465327844

This data as json

id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at closed_at author_association pull_request body repo type active_lock_reason performed_via_github_app reactions draft state_reason
465327844 MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ= 553 Potential improvements to facet-by-date 9599 open 0     3 2019-07-08T15:37:53Z 2019-07-08T15:41:55Z   OWNER  

In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696

I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm definitely often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful!

Screenshot of that link:

107914493 issue    
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   

Links from other tables

  • 1 row from issues_id in issues_labels
  • 3 rows from issue in issue_comments
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 2.202ms · About: github-to-sqlite