issues: 551834842
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 551834842 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NTE4MzQ4NDI= | 659 | README information is obscured by feature history | 55480210 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2020-01-18T22:34:51Z | 2020-12-10T23:28:51Z | 2020-12-10T23:28:51Z | NONE | While it's sometimes valuable to know how a project has developed, there is usually little justification for including this information in the README, and certainly not immediately after other key information such as "what does this package do, and who might want to use it?" Might I recommend that the feature history is migrated to an Appendix in the documentation? |
107914493 | issue | {
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/659/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
completed |