issues: 815554385
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 815554385 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTU1NTQzODU= | 237 | db["my_table"].drop(ignore=True) parameter, plus sqlite-utils drop-table --ignore and drop-view --ignore | 649467 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2021-02-24T14:55:06Z | 2021-02-25T17:11:41Z | 2021-02-25T17:11:41Z | NONE | When I'm generating a derived table in python, I often drop the table and create it from scratch. However, the first time I generate the table, it doesn't exist, so the drop raises an exception. That means more boilerplate. I was going to submit a pull request that adds an "if_exists" option to the However, for a utility like sqlite_utils, perhaps the "IF EXISTS" SQL semantics is what you want most of the time, and thus should be the default. What do you think? |
140912432 | issue | {
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/237/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
completed |