issues
7 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2022-09-26 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, created_at (date), closed_at (date)
repo 2
type 1
- issue 7
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1385026210 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5SjdKi | 1819 | Preserve query on timeout | danp 2182 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-09-25T13:32:31Z | 2022-09-26T23:16:15Z | 2022-09-26T23:06:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | If a query hits the timeout it shows a message like:
But the query is lost. Hitting the browser back button shows the query before the one that errored. It would be nice if the query that errored was preserved for more tweaking. This would make it similar to how "invalid syntax" works since #1346 / #619. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1819/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1386734383 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sp-Mv | 1821 | Release Datasette 0.63a0 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-09-26T21:15:27Z | 2022-09-26T22:06:39Z | 2022-09-26T22:06:39Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1821/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1386593843 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5Spb4z | 494 | Document how to use Just | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-09-26T19:25:12Z | 2022-09-26T19:32:36Z | 2022-09-26T19:26:39Z | OWNER | I'm using https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/afbd2b2cba45cccb305c3d4638d18db4dd3d4bbd/Justfile#L1-L24 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/494/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1363765916 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5RSWqc | 483 | `sqlite-utils install` command | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-09-06T20:13:55Z | 2022-09-26T19:04:43Z | 2022-09-26T18:57:15Z | OWNER | With the addition of In addition to the existing This isn't easy if you installed the tool with Datasette solved this problem with the
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/483/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1386530156 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5SpMVs | 492 | Idea: ability to pass extra variables to `--convert` scripts | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-09-26T18:30:45Z | 2022-09-26T18:33:19Z | OWNER | Got this idea from this example in https://jeqo.github.io/notes/2022-09-24-ingest-logs-sqlite/
This made me think: it might be neat if you could inject additional variable values into that script with extra command-line options, to make this kind of reuse easier. Something like this:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/492/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1382457780 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5SZqG0 | 490 | Ability to insert multi-line files | jeqo 6180701 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-09-22T13:29:22Z | 2022-09-26T18:24:44Z | 2022-09-23T16:37:58Z | NONE | I was looking into how to parse application log files that contain multiline text (e.g. Java stack traces) into sqlite.
I can see that at the moment I wonder if this functionality would be useful for sqlite-utils. A similar approach to Elastic logstash/filebeat can be adopted: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/beats/filebeat/current/multiline-examples.html Potential changes:
Or if this is achievable in a different way, please share. Thanks! |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/490/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1217759117 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IlYeN | 1727 | Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 32 | 2022-04-27T18:54:21Z | 2022-09-26T14:48:31Z | OWNER | I added parallel SQL query execution here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1723 My hunch is that this will take advantage of multiple cores, since Python's I'd really like to prove this is the case though. Just not sure how to do it! Larger question: is this performance optimization actually improving performance at all? Under what circumstances is it worthwhile? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);