issues
20 rows where comments = 12 and state = "closed" sorted by title
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, milestone, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title ▼ | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1426001541 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U_w6F | 1866 | API for bulk inserting records into a table | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0a0 8658075 | 12 | 2022-10-27T17:19:25Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:34Z | 2022-10-30T06:04:07Z | OWNER | Similar to https://github.com/simonw/datasette-insert/blob/0.8/README.md#inserting-data-and-creating-tables I expect this to become by far the most common way that data gets into a Datasette instance - more so than the individual row API in: - #1851 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1866/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1213683988 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IV1kU | 1718 | Code examples in the documentation should be formatted with Black | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2022-04-24T15:22:50Z | 2022-04-24T16:24:14Z | 2022-04-24T16:18:03Z | OWNER | For example on this page: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/writing_plugins.html#packaging-a-plugin I wonder if there's an easy way for me to enforce this for Sphinx documentation? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1718/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1178546862 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5GPzKu | 420 | Document how to use a `--convert` function that runs initialization code first | strada 770231 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2022-03-23T19:07:36Z | 2022-08-28T11:34:37Z | 2022-03-25T20:07:33Z | NONE | When I have an insert command with transform like this:
I noticed as the number of rows increases the operation becomes quite slow, likely due to the creation of the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/420/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1109884720 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJ38w | 1609 | Ensure "pip install datasette" still works with Python 3.6 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2022-01-21T00:08:10Z | 2022-01-24T19:20:09Z | 2022-01-21T02:24:13Z | OWNER | Original title: Can I keep "pip install datasette" working on Python 3.6?I dropped support for 3.6 in: - #1577 I'm getting reports that Is it possible to get If so, how? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1609/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
451513541 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTE1MTM1NDE= | 498 | Full text search of all tables at once? | chrismp 7936571 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2019-06-03T14:24:43Z | 2020-05-30T17:26:02Z | 2020-05-30T17:26:02Z | NONE | Does datasette have a built-in way, in a browser, to do a full-text search of all columns, in all databases and tables, that have full-text search enabled? Is there a plugin that does this? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/498/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
636722501 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzY3MjI1MDE= | 832 | Having view-table permission but NOT view-database should still grant access to /db/table | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.45 5533512 | 12 | 2020-06-11T05:12:59Z | 2020-06-30T23:42:11Z | 2020-06-30T23:42:11Z | OWNER | Stumbled into this while working on |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/832/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
339505204 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMzk1MDUyMDQ= | 335 | Package datasette for installation using homebrew | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2018-07-09T15:45:03Z | 2020-08-11T16:54:06Z | 2020-08-11T16:54:06Z | OWNER | https://docs.brew.sh/Python-for-Formula-Authors describes how.
It recommends using https://github.com/tdsmith/homebrew-pypi-poet |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/335/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
459587155 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkwODk3MTA0 | 518 | Port Datasette from Sanic to ASGI + Uvicorn | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2019-06-23T15:18:42Z | 2019-06-24T13:42:50Z | 2019-06-24T03:13:09Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/518 | Most of the code here was fleshed out in comments on #272 (Port Datasette to ASGI) - this pull request will track the final pieces:
|
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/518/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||
1055469073 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-6S4R | 1513 | Research: CTEs and union all to calculate facets AND query at the same time | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2021-11-16T22:26:45Z | 2021-11-16T23:41:46Z | 2021-11-16T23:41:46Z | OWNER | Consider this page: https://global-power-plants.datasettes.com/global-power-plants/global-power-plants?_search=plant&_facet=owner&_facet=country_long&_facet=primary_fuel Datasette needs to run the main query for the rows on that page, a count query for the total query, then a separate query for each of those three specified facets. This is a Could running that query as a CTE and doing the other queries as part of the same large query produce significant speed improvements? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1513/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1005891028 | I_kwDOCGYnMM479K3U | 329 | Rethink approach to [ and ] in column names (currently throws error) | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2021-09-23T22:14:24Z | 2021-11-15T02:57:51Z | 2021-11-15T02:57:51Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-app/issues/121#issuecomment-926200398 This is a rethinking of the solution to: |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/329/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1424378012 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U5kic | 1860 | SQL query field can't begin by a comment | CharlesNepote 562352 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2022-10-26T16:55:31Z | 2022-10-27T18:57:37Z | 2022-10-27T04:21:40Z | NONE | SQL comments are very useful to explain the meaning of the query. It's currently impossible to put it at the beginning of the field as seen on the screen capture: it leads to an error: It would be great to make it possible because:
* as the request is the title of the page:
* it eases the search with search engines
* it eases the search in the browsers' url field
* it acts as a kind of title: the global meaning of the query is immediately understandable
* some tools, such as Slack, are shortening long URLs and displaying the beginning of the URLs (eg. Beginning a query with a comment is possible with SQLite. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1860/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
337141108 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMzcxNDExMDg= | 332 | Sanely handle Infinity/-Infinity values in JSON using ?_json_infinity=1 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2018-06-29T21:21:27Z | 2018-07-24T04:53:20Z | 2018-07-24T03:08:30Z | OWNER | It turns out if you load this CSV using
I deployed this using:
Datasette outputs that as Demo * https://datasette-infinity-bug.now.sh/infinity-bug-0d0224e/infinity-bug - HTML view works * https://datasette-infinity-bug.now.sh/infinity-bug-0d0224e/infinity-bug.json?_shape=array - this outputs the following:
But... in Firefox that gets rendered like this: And if you click the "Show charting options" button you get this error in the console:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/332/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
906330187 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MDYzMzAxODc= | 260 | Support creating descending order indexes | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2021-05-29T03:42:59Z | 2021-05-29T05:01:39Z | 2021-05-29T05:01:39Z | OWNER | SQLite lets you create indexes in reverse order, which can have a surprisingly big impact on performance, see https://github.com/simonw/covid-19-datasette/issues/27 I tried doing this using
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/260/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1168995756 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FrXWs | 1657 | Tilde encoding: use ~ instead of - for dash-encoding | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2022-03-14T22:55:17Z | 2022-03-15T18:25:11Z | 2022-03-15T18:01:58Z | OWNER | Refs #1439 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1657/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1087181951 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5AzRR_ | 1576 | Traces should include SQL executed by subtasks created with `asyncio.gather` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2021-12-22T20:52:02Z | 2022-02-05T05:21:35Z | 2022-02-05T05:19:53Z | OWNER | I tried running some parallel SQL queries using I realized that was because traces are keyed against the current task ID, which changes when a sub-task is run using The faceting and suggest faceting queries are missing from this trace:
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1518#issuecomment-999870993 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1576/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1656432059 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c5NuBNG | 2053 | WIP new JSON for queries | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2023-04-05T23:26:15Z | 2023-07-26T18:28:59Z | 2023-07-26T18:26:45Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/2053 | Refs: - #2049 TODO:
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--2053.org.readthedocs.build/en/2053/ |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2053/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | |||||
440222719 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDAyMjI3MTk= | 448 | _facet_array should work against views | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2019-05-03T21:08:04Z | 2021-11-16T01:32:05Z | 2021-11-16T01:19:40Z | OWNER | I created this view: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads-8dbda00/ads_with_targets
When I try to apply faceting by array it appears to work at first: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads/ads_with_targets?_facet_array=target_names But actually it's doing the wrong thing - the SQL for the facets uses rowid, but rowid is not present on views at all! These results are incorrect, and clicking to select a facet will fail to produce any rows: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads/ads_with_targets?_facet_array=target_names&target_names__arraycontains=people_who_match%3Ainterests%3AAfrican-American+Civil+Rights+Movement+%281954%E2%80%9468%29 Here's the SQL it should be using when you select a facet (note that it does not use a rowid): https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads?sql=select+*+from+ads_with_targets+where+id+in+%28%0D%0A++++++++++++select+ads_with_targets.id+from+ads_with_targets%2C+json_each%28ads_with_targets.target_names%29+j%0D%0A++++++++++++where+j.value+%3D+%3Ap0%0D%0A++++++++%29+limit+101&p0=people_who_match%3Ainterests%3ABlack+%28Color%29 So we need to do something a lot smarter here. I'm not sure what the fix will look like, or even if it's feasible given that views don't have a rowid to hook into so the JSON faceting SQL may have to be completely rewritten.
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/448/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1435294468 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VjNsE | 1882 | `/db/-/create` API for creating tables | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0a0 8658075 | 12 | 2022-11-03T21:44:32Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:43Z | 2022-11-15T06:00:41Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1862#issuecomment-1299073433 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
588108428 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODgxMDg0Mjg= | 712 | base_url doesn't entirely work for running Datasette inside Binder | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2020-03-26T02:25:55Z | 2020-03-26T15:11:49Z | 2020-03-26T14:35:43Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @wragge in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/394#issuecomment-604166918 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/712/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1352932716 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5QpB1s | 471 | sqlite-utils query --functions mechanism for registering extra functions | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3.29 8355157 | 12 | 2022-08-27T03:57:53Z | 2022-09-07T03:46:26Z | 2022-08-27T05:10:57Z | OWNER | It would be really cool if you could register additional custom SQL functions for use with the ``` sqlite-utils data.db 'update images set domain = extract_domain(url)' --functions ' from urllib.parse import urlparse def extract_domain(url): return urlparse(url).netloc ' ``` Every function defined in that code block would be registered with the connection, unless the name began with an underscore. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/471/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);
comments 1 ✖