issues
5 rows where comments = 14 and state = "open" sorted by updated_at
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▼ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
647095487 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDcwOTU0ODc= | 873 | "datasette -p 0 --root" gives the wrong URL | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2020-06-29T04:03:06Z | 2020-08-18T17:26:10Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/873/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1125297737 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5DEq5J | 402 | Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2022-02-06T19:47:41Z | 2022-02-16T10:18:55Z | OWNER | The
New proposed mechanism: ```python from sqlite_utils.utils import LongitudeLatitude db["places"].insert(
{
"name": "London",
"point": (-0.118092, 51.509865)
},
conversions={"point": LongitudeLatitude},
)
This would involve a change to the Best of all... this resolves the Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030739566 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
455486286 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTU0ODYyODY= | 26 | Mechanism for turning nested JSON into foreign keys / many-to-many | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2019-06-13T00:52:06Z | 2022-06-29T23:35:29Z | OWNER | The GitHub JSON APIs have a really interesting convention with respect to related objects. Consider https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues - here's a truncated subset:
Since both user and label have populated It would be really neat if Thanks to |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26/reactions", "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1573424830 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dyI6- | 2019 | Refactor out the keyset pagination code | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2023-02-06T23:04:00Z | 2023-02-08T01:40:46Z | OWNER | While working on: - #1999 I noticed that some of the most complex code in the existing table view is the code that implements keyset pagination: Extracting that into a utility function would simplify that code a lot. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2019/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1615692818 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5gTYQS | 2035 | Potential feature: special support for `?a=1&a=2` on the query page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 14 | 2023-03-08T18:05:03Z | 2023-03-31T16:09:08Z | OWNER | From a discussion on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/996877076982415491/1082789517062320138 The key idea is to make it easier for people to implement What if you could add |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2035/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);
comments 1 ✖