issues
117 rows where milestone = 3268330 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
repo 1
- datasette 11
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
570301333 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDEzMzM= | 684 | Add documentation on Database introspection methods to internals.rst | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2020-02-25T04:20:24Z | 2020-06-04T18:56:15Z | 2020-05-30T18:40:39Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/684/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
629595228 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDI2ODkxNDcx | 796 | New WIP writable canned queries | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 9 | 2020-06-03T00:08:00Z | 2020-06-03T15:16:52Z | 2020-06-03T15:16:50Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/796 | Refs #698. Replaces #703 Still todo:
|
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
629535669 | MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjk1MzU2Njk= | 794 | Show hooks implemented by each plugin on /-/plugins | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2020-06-02T21:44:38Z | 2020-06-02T22:30:17Z | 2020-06-02T21:50:10Z | OWNER | e.g.
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/794/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
570101428 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzc5MTkyMjU4 | 683 | .execute_write() and .execute_write_fn() methods on Database | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 14 | 2020-02-24T19:51:58Z | 2020-05-30T18:40:20Z | 2020-02-25T04:45:08Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/683 | See #682
|
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/683/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
374953006 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNzQ5NTMwMDY= | 369 | Interface should show same JSON shape options for custom SQL queries | gfrmin 416374 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2018-10-29T10:39:15Z | 2020-05-30T17:24:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | At the moment the page returning a custom SQL query shows the JSON and CSV APIs, but not the multiple JSON shapes. However, adding the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/369/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
570309546 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDk1NDY= | 685 | Document (and reconsider design of) Database.execute() and Database.execute_against_connection_in_thread() | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 15 | 2020-02-25T04:49:44Z | 2020-05-30T13:20:50Z | 2020-05-08T17:42:18Z | OWNER | In #683 I started a new section of internals documentation covering the I decided not to document |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/685/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
585633142 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODU2MzMxNDI= | 706 | Documentation for the "request" object | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2020-03-22T02:55:50Z | 2020-05-30T13:20:00Z | 2020-05-27T22:31:22Z | OWNER | Since that object is passed to the I could also start passing it to the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/706/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
626078521 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYwNzg1MjE= | 774 | Consolidate request.raw_args and request.args | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 8 | 2020-05-27T22:30:59Z | 2020-05-29T23:27:35Z | 2020-05-29T23:22:38Z | OWNER |
I use it in a few places in other projects though, so I'll have to fix those first: https://github.com/search?q=user%3Asimonw+raw_args&type=Code |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/774/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
497171390 | MDU6SXNzdWU0OTcxNzEzOTA= | 577 | Utility mechanism for plugins to render templates | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 7 | 2019-09-23T15:30:36Z | 2020-02-04T20:26:20Z | 2020-02-04T20:26:19Z | OWNER | Sometimes a plugin will need to render a template for some custom UI. We need a documented API for doing this, which ensures that everything will work correctly if you extend base.html etc. See also #576. This could be a |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/577/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
459587155 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkwODk3MTA0 | 518 | Port Datasette from Sanic to ASGI + Uvicorn | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2019-06-23T15:18:42Z | 2019-06-24T13:42:50Z | 2019-06-24T03:13:09Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/518 | Most of the code here was fleshed out in comments on #272 (Port Datasette to ASGI) - this pull request will track the final pieces:
|
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/518/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||
324188953 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjQxODg5NTM= | 272 | Port Datasette to ASGI | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 42 | 2018-05-17T21:16:32Z | 2019-06-24T04:54:15Z | 2019-06-24T03:33:06Z | OWNER | Datasette doesn't take much advantage of Sanic, and I'm increasingly having to work around parts of it because of idiosyncrasies that are specific to Datasette - caring about the exact order of querystring arguments for example. Since Datasette is GET-only our needs from a web framework are actually pretty slim. This becomes more important as I expand the plugins #14 framework. Am I sure I want the plugin ecosystem to depend on a Sanic if I might move away from it in the future? If Datasette wasn't all about async/await I would use WSGI, but today it makes more sense to use ASGI. I'd like to be confident that switching to ASGI would still give me the excellent performance that Sanic provides. https://github.com/django/asgiref/blob/master/specs/asgi.rst |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/272/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);