issues
2 rows where "created_at" is on date 2021-08-30 and state = "open" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
983221851 | MDU6SXNzdWU5ODMyMjE4NTE= | 34 | Data folder as index command parameter | humrochagf 1223625 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-08-30T21:29:33Z | 2021-08-30T21:29:33Z | NONE | Hi, First of all, thank you for this wonderful project :smile: I started to use dogsheep to make my personal data searchable, and by using the project I noticed an issue with the index command. It always expects you are running it from the root folder from where the data is located, so I got some errors while trying to make it work on my setup. I separate all databases inside a Before, I configured
And running the index command like this:
It worked to the normal search feature with no problem this way, but when I started adding So my workaround to that was to cd into the data folder and run the indexer. You can check the way I'm doing it at this line of the makefile: https://github.com/humrochagf/my-dogsheep/blob/main/makefile#L3 It works but it would be nice to have an option to pass the path where the data is located to the index function. |
dogsheep-beta 197431109 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/34/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
982803408 | MDU6SXNzdWU5ODI4MDM0MDg= | 1454 | Feature Request: Publish to IPFS | blitmap 1560788 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-08-30T13:36:18Z | 2021-08-30T13:36:18Z | NONE | Hello, I am a huge fan of this being used for exploring data. I think it has a lot of flexibility not found in other tools. I'm not sure if what I'm asking for is possible: Can this be extended to publish to IPFS? IPFS is an attractive hosting option for decentralized journalism. Food for thought ~ |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1454/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);