issues
3 rows where "created_at" is on date 2021-08-09 sorted by node_id
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, author_association, updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
repo 2
type 1
- issue 3
id | node_id ▼ | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
963897111 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjM4OTcxMTE= | 309 | sqlite-utils insert errors should show SQL and parameters, if possible | scaleoutsean 16622642 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2021-08-09T11:24:14Z | 2021-08-09T23:40:29Z | 2021-08-09T22:25:58Z | NONE | I've tried several approaches, but this is the current one:
I googled the error and checked SO answers and advice, all good. I changed my JSON file to not use integers so I no longer get this error. Of course, that makes using the database a bit harder, so I also tried to solve the problem by modifying DB structure (while using integers in JSON). If change all If that is the case, can this error be a bit more specific for easier troubleshooting - maybe tell us which which record caused the problem when that error is thrown? My table has 60+ columns, many of which use 64-bit integers (not all records are large or known in advance), so while I can modify JSON to use strings instead of integers, it decreases usability and finding out which records have values for which SQLite integers aren't sufficient requires some work (I'm thinking about parsing all integers with My environment:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/309/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
964400482 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjQ0MDA0ODI= | 310 | `sqlite-utils insert --flatten` option to flatten nested JSON | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2021-08-09T21:23:08Z | 2021-10-16T13:54:56Z | 2021-08-09T21:44:06Z | OWNER | I had to do this with a
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/310/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
964322136 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjQzMjIxMzY= | 1426 | Manage /robots.txt in Datasette core, block robots by default | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 9 | 2021-08-09T19:56:56Z | 2021-12-04T07:11:29Z | OWNER | See accompanying Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1424820203603431439
I have a lot of Datasettes deployed now, and tailing logs shows that they are being hammered by search engine crawlers even though many of them are not interesting enough to warrant indexing. I'm starting to think blocking crawlers would actually be a better default for most people, provided it was well documented and easy to understand how to allow them. Default-deny is usually a better policy than default-allow! |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1426/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);