issues
4 rows where "created_at" is on date 2019-09-02 sorted by type
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, author_association, updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
repo 2
state 1
- closed 4
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type ▼ | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
488293926 | MDU6SXNzdWU0ODgyOTM5MjY= | 58 | Support enabling FTS on views | amjith 49260 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-09-02T18:56:36Z | 2020-10-16T18:39:36Z | 2020-10-16T18:39:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Right now enable_fts() is only implemented for Table(). Technically sqlite supports enabling fts on views. But it requires deeper thought since views don't have It is possible to provide an alternative rowid using the Ref: https://sqlite.org/fts5.html#fts5_table_creation_and_initialization
This will further complicate |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/58/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
488338516 | MDU6SXNzdWU0ODgzMzg1MTY= | 570 | detect_fts should handle alternative table escaping | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-09-02T23:43:29Z | 2019-09-03T00:32:28Z | 2019-09-03T00:32:28Z | OWNER | sqlite-utils now uses a better way of escaping table names, which has highlighted a bug in Datasette. Datasette has its own version of the Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/57#issuecomment-527258212 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/570/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
488338965 | MDU6SXNzdWU0ODgzMzg5NjU= | 59 | Ability to introspect triggers | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-09-02T23:47:16Z | 2019-09-03T01:52:36Z | 2019-09-03T00:09:42Z | OWNER | Now that we're creating triggers (thanks to @amjith in #57) it would be neat if we could introspect them too. I'm thinking:
The underlying query for this is I'll return the trigger information in a new namedtuple, similar to how Indexes and ForeignKeys work. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/59/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
487987958 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzEzMTA1NjM0 | 57 | Add triggers while enabling FTS | amjith 49260 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2019-09-02T04:23:40Z | 2019-09-03T01:03:59Z | 2019-09-02T23:42:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/57 | This adds the option for a user to set up triggers in the database to keep their FTS table in sync with the parent table. Ref: https://sqlite.org/fts5.html#external_content_and_contentless_tables I would prefer to make the creation of triggers the default behavior, but that will break existing usage where people have been calling I am happy to make changes to the PR as you see fit. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/57/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);