issues
5 rows where type = "issue" and "updated_at" is on date 2023-08-31 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, author_association, created_at (date), closed_at (date)
repo 2
type 1
- issue · 5 ✖
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1292370469 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5NCAIl | 1765 | Document plugins providing new plugin hook- | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-07-03T17:05:14Z | 2023-08-31T23:08:24Z | 2023-08-31T23:06:31Z | OWNER | I've used this pattern twice now: https://til.simonwillison.net/datasette/register-new-plugin-hooks - in |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1765/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1876407598 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5v17Uu | 2169 | execute-sql on a database should imply view-database/view-permission | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-08-31T22:45:56Z | 2023-08-31T22:46:28Z | 2023-08-31T22:46:28Z | OWNER | I noticed that a token with |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2169/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1875739055 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5vzYGv | 2167 | Document return type of await ds.permission_allowed() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-08-31T15:14:23Z | 2023-08-31T15:14:23Z | OWNER | The return type isn't documented here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4c3ef033110407f3b3dbce501659d523724985e0/docs/internals.rst#L327-L350 On inspecting the code I'm not 100% sure if it's possible for this. method to return |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2167/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1871935751 | I_kwDOD079W85vk3kH | 40 | ImportError: cannot import name 'formatargspec' from 'inspect' | hosslikw 36752421 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-08-29T15:36:31Z | 2023-08-31T03:18:07Z | 2023-08-31T03:18:06Z | NONE | I get the following error when running "pip3 install dogsheep-photos" " from inspect import ismethod, isclass, formatargspec ImportError: cannot import name 'formatargspec' from 'inspect' (/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.12/lib/python3.12/inspect.py). Did you mean: 'formatargvalues'?" Python 3.12.0rc1 sqlite 3.43.0 datasette, version 0.64.3 |
dogsheep-photos 256834907 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/40/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1865869205 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5vNueV | 2157 | Proposal: Make the `_internal` database persistent, customizable, and hidden | asg017 15178711 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-08-24T20:54:29Z | 2023-08-31T02:45:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The current The current
Additionally, it would be really nice if plugins could use this
In general, these are specific features that Datasette plugins would have access to if there was a central internal database they could read/write to:
Proposal
New features unlocked with thisThese features don't really need a standardized
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2157/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);