issues
89 rows where repo = 140912432 and state = "open" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
818684978 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTg2ODQ5Nzg= | 243 | How can i use this utils to deal with fts on column meta of tables ? | svjack 27874014 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-03-01T09:45:05Z | 2021-03-01T09:45:05Z | NONE | Thank you to release this bravo project. When i use this project on multi table db, I want to implement convenient search on column name from different tables. I want to develop a meta table to save the meta data of different columns of different tables and search on this meta table to get rows from the data table (which the meta table describes) does this project provide some simple function on it ? You can think a have a knowledge graph about the table in the db, and i save this knowledge graph into the db with fts enabled. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/243/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
816601354 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTgwMjM1NDI3 | 241 | Extract expand - work in progress | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/241 | Refs #239. Still needs documentation and CLI implementation. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/241/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
688670158 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODg2NzAxNTg= | 147 | SQLITE_MAX_VARS maybe hard-coded too low | simonwiles 96218 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-08-30T07:26:45Z | 2021-02-15T21:27:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I came across this while about to open an issue and PR against the documentation for As mentioned in #145, while:
it is common that it is increased at compile time. Debian-based systems, for example, seem to ship with a version of sqlite compiled with SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER set to 250,000, and I believe this is the case for homebrew installations too. In working to understand what Unfortunately, it seems that Obviously this couldn't be relied upon in |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/147/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
472115381 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzIxMTUzODE= | 49 | extracts= should support multiple-column extracts | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 10 | 2019-07-24T07:06:41Z | 2020-10-16T19:18:19Z | OWNER | Lookup tables can be constructed on compound columns, but the Right now extracts can be defined in two ways: ```python Extract these columns into tables with the same name:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts=["breed", "most_recent_trophy"]) Same as above but with custom table names:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts={"breed": "Breeds", "most_recent_trophy": "Trophies"}) ``` Need some kind of syntax for much more complicated extractions, like when two columns (say "source" and "source_version") are extracted into a single table. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
573578548 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzM1Nzg1NDg= | 89 | Ability to customize columns used by extracts= feature | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-03-01T16:54:48Z | 2020-10-16T19:17:50Z | OWNER | @simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, Initial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:
I haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing? Originally posted by @chrishas35 in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/89/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
581795570 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODE3OTU1NzA= | 93 | Support more string values for types in .add_column() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-03-15T19:32:49Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/2.4.2/python-api.html#adding-columns says:
As discovered in #92 this isn't the right list of values. I should expand this to match https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/93/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
652961907 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NTI5NjE5MDc= | 121 | Improved (and better documented) support for transactions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-07-08T04:56:51Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/118#issuecomment-655283393 We should put some thought into how this library supports and encourages smart use of transactions. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/121/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
688352145 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTIxNDU= | 141 | insert-files support for compressed values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-08-28T20:59:46Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:08Z | OWNER | The |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/141/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
695441530 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU0NDE1MzA= | 154 | OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-09-07T23:42:44Z | 2020-09-07T23:47:10Z | OWNER | I'm getting this error when running:
I'm worried that maybe that's because of this new code from #152: |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/154/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
644161221 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDQxNjEyMjE= | 117 | Support for compound (composite) foreign keys | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-06-23T21:33:42Z | 2020-06-23T21:40:31Z | OWNER | It turns out SQLite supports composite foreign keys: https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_composite Their example looks like this: ```sql CREATE TABLE album( albumartist TEXT, albumname TEXT, albumcover BINARY, PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname) ); CREATE TABLE song( songid INTEGER, songartist TEXT, songalbum TEXT, songname TEXT, FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname) ); ``` Here's what that looks like in sqlite-utils: ``` In [1]: import sqlite_utils In [2]: import sqlite3 In [3]: conn = sqlite3.connect(":memory:") In [4]: conn In [5]: conn.executescript("""
...: CREATE TABLE album(
...: albumartist TEXT,
...: albumname TEXT,
...: albumcover BINARY,
...: PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname)
...: );
...: In [6]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn) In [7]: db.tables |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
539204432 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzkyMDQ0MzI= | 70 | Implement ON DELETE and ON UPDATE actions for foreign keys | LucasElArruda 26292069 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-12-17T17:19:10Z | 2020-02-27T04:18:53Z | NONE | Hi! I did not find any mention on the library about ON DELETE and ON UPDATE actions for foreign keys. Are those expected to be implemented? If not, it would be a nice thing to include! |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/70/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
546073980 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDYwNzM5ODA= | 74 | Test failures on openSUSE 15.1: AssertionError: Explicit other_table and other_column | jayvdb 15092 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-01-07T04:35:50Z | 2020-01-12T07:21:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | openSUSE 15.1 is using python 3.6.5 and click-7.0 , however it has test failures while openSUSE Tumbleweed on py37 passes. Most fail on the cli exit code like
packaging project at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:jayvdb:py-new/python-sqlite-utils I'll keep digging into this after I have github-to-sqlite working on Tumbleweed, as I'll need openSUSE Leap 15.1 working before I can submit this into the main python repo. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/74/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);