issues
89 rows where repo = 140912432 and state = "open" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1181236173 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5GaDvN | 422 | Reconsider not running convert functions against null values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-03-25T20:22:40Z | 2022-03-25T20:23:21Z | OWNER | I just got caught out by the fact that I had run this code while working on #420 and I wasn't sure why it didn't work: ``` $ sqlite-utils add-column content.db articles score float $ sqlite-utils convert content.db articles score ' import random random.seed(10) def convert(value):
global random
return random.random()
'
I fixed it by doing this instead:
But this indicates to me that the design of |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/422/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
688351054 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTEwNTQ= | 140 | Idea: insert-files mechanism for adding extra columns with fixed values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-08-28T20:57:36Z | 2022-03-20T19:45:45Z | OWNER | Say for example you want to populate a
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/140/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
675753042 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NzU3NTMwNDI= | 131 | sqlite-utils insert: options for column types | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2020-08-09T18:59:11Z | 2022-03-15T13:21:42Z | OWNER | The It would be useful if you could do the following:
For specific columns maybe this:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/131/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1160034488 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5FJLi4 | 411 | Support for generated columns | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 8 | 2022-03-04T20:41:33Z | 2022-03-11T22:32:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This is a fairly new feature -- SQLite version 3.31.0 (2020-01-22) -- that I, admittedly, haven't gotten to work yet. But it looks incredibly useful: https://dgl.cx/2020/06/sqlite-json-support I'm not sure if this is an option on
More here: https://www.sqlite.org/gencol.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/411/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1125297737 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5DEq5J | 402 | Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2022-02-06T19:47:41Z | 2022-02-16T10:18:55Z | OWNER | The
New proposed mechanism: ```python from sqlite_utils.utils import LongitudeLatitude db["places"].insert(
{
"name": "London",
"point": (-0.118092, 51.509865)
},
conversions={"point": LongitudeLatitude},
)
This would involve a change to the Best of all... this resolves the Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030739566 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1072792507 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_8YO7 | 352 | `sqlite-utils insert --extract colname` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2021-12-07T00:55:44Z | 2022-02-03T22:59:36Z | OWNER | Is there a reason I've not added |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/352/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1122446693 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5C5y1l | 394 | Test against Python 3.11-dev | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-02-02T22:21:03Z | 2022-02-03T21:06:35Z | OWNER | sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/394/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
1090798237 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5BBEKd | 359 | Use RETURNING if available to populate last_pk | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-12-29T23:43:23Z | 2021-12-29T23:43:23Z | OWNER | Inspired by this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29729283
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/359/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
706001517 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MDYwMDE1MTc= | 163 | Idea: conversions= could take Python functions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2020-09-22T00:37:12Z | 2021-12-20T00:56:52Z | OWNER | Right now you use
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/163/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1066603133 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM4vKAzW | 347 | Test against pysqlite3 running SQLite 3.37 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 9 | 2021-11-29T23:17:57Z | 2021-12-11T01:02:19Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/347 | Refs #346 and #344. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/347/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
1071531082 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_3kRK | 349 | A way of creating indexes on newly created tables | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-12-05T18:56:12Z | 2021-12-07T01:04:37Z | OWNER | I'm writing code for https://github.com/simonw/git-history/issues/33 that creates a table inside a loop:
But there's no mechanism in SQLite utils to detect if the table was created for the first time and add an index to it. And I don't want to run This should work like the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/349/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1072435124 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_7A-0 | 350 | Optional caching mechanism for table.lookup() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-12-06T17:54:25Z | 2021-12-06T17:56:57Z | OWNER | Inspired by work on
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1066563554 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_knfi | 346 | Way to test SQLite 3.37 (and potentially other versions) in CI | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2021-11-29T22:21:06Z | 2021-11-29T23:12:49Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/344#issuecomment-982076924 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/346/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
836829560 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MzY4Mjk1NjA= | 248 | support for Apache Arrow / parquet files I/O | mhalle 649467 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-03-20T14:59:30Z | 2021-10-28T23:46:48Z | NONE | I just started looking at Apache Arrow using pyarrow for import and export of tabular datasets, and it looks quite compelling. It might be worth looking at for sqlite-utils and/or datasette. As a test, I took a random jsonl data dump of a dataset I have with floats, strings, and ints and converted it to arrow's parquet format using the naive The only hangup is the automatic type inference of the naive reader. It's great for general laziness and for parsing JSON columns (it correctly interpreted a table of mine with a JSON array). However, I did get an exception for a string column where most entries looked integer-like but had a couple values that weren't -- the reader tried to coerce all of them for some reason, even though the JSON type is string. Since the writer optionally takes a schema, it shouldn't be too hard to grab the sqlite header types. With some additional hinting, you might get datetime columns and JSON, which are native Arrow types. Somewhat tangentially, someone even wrote an sqlite vfs extension for Parquet: https://cldellow.com/2018/06/22/sqlite-parquet-vtable.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/248/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
817989436 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTc5ODk0MzY= | 242 | Async support | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 13 | 2021-02-27T18:29:38Z | 2021-10-28T14:37:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Following our conversation last week, want to note this here before I forget. I've had a couple situations where I'd like to do a bunch of updates in an async event loop, but I run into SQLite's issues with concurrent writes. This feels like something sqlite-utils could help with. PeeWee ORM has a SQLite write queue that might be a good model. It's using threads or gevent, but I think that approach would translate well enough to asyncio. Happy to help with this, too. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/242/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
974067156 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NzQwNjcxNTY= | 318 | Research: handle gzipped CSV directly | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-18T21:23:04Z | 2021-08-18T21:25:30Z | OWNER | Would it be worthwhile for the Maybe add |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/318/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
722816436 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjI4MTY0MzY= | 186 | .extract() shouldn't extract null values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-10-16T02:41:08Z | 2021-08-12T12:32:14Z | OWNER | This almost works, but it creates a rogue |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/186/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
961008507 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjEwMDg1MDc= | 308 | Add an interactive tutorial as a Jupyter notebook | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-04T20:34:22Z | 2021-08-04T21:30:59Z | OWNER | Can show people how to open this up in Binder. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/308/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
915421499 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MTU0MjE0OTk= | 267 | row.update() or row.pk | Gravitar64 12721157 | open | 0 | 4 | 2021-06-08T19:56:00Z | 2021-06-22T17:27:27Z | NONE | Hi, fantastic framework for working with Sqlite3 databases!!! I tried to update spezific rows in a table and used for row in db[tablename]:
newValue = row["counter"] * row["prize"] This updates the value in the printet row, but not in the database. So I switched to db[tablename].update(id, {"Filedname": newValue}) This works fine. But row.update would be nicer, because no need for the id (its that row), no need for the tablename and the db (all defined in the for row ... loop). Thx |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/267/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
818684978 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTg2ODQ5Nzg= | 243 | How can i use this utils to deal with fts on column meta of tables ? | svjack 27874014 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-03-01T09:45:05Z | 2021-03-01T09:45:05Z | NONE | Thank you to release this bravo project. When i use this project on multi table db, I want to implement convenient search on column name from different tables. I want to develop a meta table to save the meta data of different columns of different tables and search on this meta table to get rows from the data table (which the meta table describes) does this project provide some simple function on it ? You can think a have a knowledge graph about the table in the db, and i save this knowledge graph into the db with fts enabled. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/243/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
816601354 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTgwMjM1NDI3 | 241 | Extract expand - work in progress | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/241 | Refs #239. Still needs documentation and CLI implementation. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/241/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
688670158 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODg2NzAxNTg= | 147 | SQLITE_MAX_VARS maybe hard-coded too low | simonwiles 96218 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-08-30T07:26:45Z | 2021-02-15T21:27:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I came across this while about to open an issue and PR against the documentation for As mentioned in #145, while:
it is common that it is increased at compile time. Debian-based systems, for example, seem to ship with a version of sqlite compiled with SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER set to 250,000, and I believe this is the case for homebrew installations too. In working to understand what Unfortunately, it seems that Obviously this couldn't be relied upon in |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/147/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
472115381 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzIxMTUzODE= | 49 | extracts= should support multiple-column extracts | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 10 | 2019-07-24T07:06:41Z | 2020-10-16T19:18:19Z | OWNER | Lookup tables can be constructed on compound columns, but the Right now extracts can be defined in two ways: ```python Extract these columns into tables with the same name:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts=["breed", "most_recent_trophy"]) Same as above but with custom table names:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts={"breed": "Breeds", "most_recent_trophy": "Trophies"}) ``` Need some kind of syntax for much more complicated extractions, like when two columns (say "source" and "source_version") are extracted into a single table. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
573578548 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzM1Nzg1NDg= | 89 | Ability to customize columns used by extracts= feature | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-03-01T16:54:48Z | 2020-10-16T19:17:50Z | OWNER | @simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, Initial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:
I haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing? Originally posted by @chrishas35 in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/89/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
581795570 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODE3OTU1NzA= | 93 | Support more string values for types in .add_column() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-03-15T19:32:49Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/2.4.2/python-api.html#adding-columns says:
As discovered in #92 this isn't the right list of values. I should expand this to match https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/93/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
652961907 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NTI5NjE5MDc= | 121 | Improved (and better documented) support for transactions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-07-08T04:56:51Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/118#issuecomment-655283393 We should put some thought into how this library supports and encourages smart use of transactions. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/121/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
688352145 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTIxNDU= | 141 | insert-files support for compressed values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-08-28T20:59:46Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:08Z | OWNER | The |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/141/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
695441530 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU0NDE1MzA= | 154 | OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-09-07T23:42:44Z | 2020-09-07T23:47:10Z | OWNER | I'm getting this error when running:
I'm worried that maybe that's because of this new code from #152: |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/154/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
644161221 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDQxNjEyMjE= | 117 | Support for compound (composite) foreign keys | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-06-23T21:33:42Z | 2020-06-23T21:40:31Z | OWNER | It turns out SQLite supports composite foreign keys: https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_composite Their example looks like this: ```sql CREATE TABLE album( albumartist TEXT, albumname TEXT, albumcover BINARY, PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname) ); CREATE TABLE song( songid INTEGER, songartist TEXT, songalbum TEXT, songname TEXT, FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname) ); ``` Here's what that looks like in sqlite-utils: ``` In [1]: import sqlite_utils In [2]: import sqlite3 In [3]: conn = sqlite3.connect(":memory:") In [4]: conn In [5]: conn.executescript("""
...: CREATE TABLE album(
...: albumartist TEXT,
...: albumname TEXT,
...: albumcover BINARY,
...: PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname)
...: );
...: In [6]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn) In [7]: db.tables |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
539204432 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzkyMDQ0MzI= | 70 | Implement ON DELETE and ON UPDATE actions for foreign keys | LucasElArruda 26292069 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-12-17T17:19:10Z | 2020-02-27T04:18:53Z | NONE | Hi! I did not find any mention on the library about ON DELETE and ON UPDATE actions for foreign keys. Are those expected to be implemented? If not, it would be a nice thing to include! |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/70/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
546073980 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDYwNzM5ODA= | 74 | Test failures on openSUSE 15.1: AssertionError: Explicit other_table and other_column | jayvdb 15092 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-01-07T04:35:50Z | 2020-01-12T07:21:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | openSUSE 15.1 is using python 3.6.5 and click-7.0 , however it has test failures while openSUSE Tumbleweed on py37 passes. Most fail on the cli exit code like
packaging project at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:jayvdb:py-new/python-sqlite-utils I'll keep digging into this after I have github-to-sqlite working on Tumbleweed, as I'll need openSUSE Leap 15.1 working before I can submit this into the main python repo. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/74/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);