issues
7 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and comments = 6 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1439009231 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VxYnP | 1884 | Exclude virtual tables from datasette inspect | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 6 | 2022-11-07T21:26:01Z | 2022-11-21T04:40:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ran
It still worked, but probably want to catch this. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1884/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1193090967 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HHR-X | 1699 | Proposal: datasette query | eyeseast 25778 | open | 0 | 6 | 2022-04-05T12:36:43Z | 2022-04-11T01:32:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I started sketching out a plugin to add a At its most basic, it will write the results of a query to STDOUT.
This isn't much improvement over using sqlite-utils. To make better use of datasette and its ecosystem, run For example, using the metadata file from alltheplaces-datasette:
That query would be good to get as CSV, and we can auto-discover metadata and databases in the current directory:
In this case, If a query takes parameters, I can pass them in at runtime, using the
I'm very interested in feedback on this, including whether it should be a plugin or in Datasette core. (I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I'm prototyping it as a plugin to start.) |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1076388044 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5AKGDM | 1547 | Writable canned queries fail to load custom templates | wragge 127565 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.60 7571612 | 6 | 2021-12-10T03:31:48Z | 2022-01-13T22:27:59Z | 2021-12-19T21:12:00Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've created a canned query with
My non-writeable canned queries pick up custom templates as expected, and if I look at their HTML I see the canned query name added to the templates considered (the canned query here is
So it seems like the writeable canned query is behaving differently for some reason. Is it an authentication thing? I'm using the built in Thanks! |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1547/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
991191951 | MDU6SXNzdWU5OTExOTE5NTE= | 1464 | clean checkout & clean environment has test failures | ctb 51016 | open | 0 | 6 | 2021-09-08T14:16:23Z | 2021-09-13T22:17:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I followed the instructions here, and even after running
This is with python 3.9.7 and lots of other packages, as in attached environment listing from |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1464/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
907645813 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MDc2NDU4MTM= | 57 | Error: Use either --since or --since_id, not both | rubenv 42904 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2021-05-31T18:11:04Z | 2021-08-20T00:01:31Z | 2021-08-20T00:01:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm using the following command:
Which gives the following error:
Running without
|
twitter-to-sqlite 206156866 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/57/reactions", "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
314455877 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTgxNzIzMzAz | 209 | Don't duplicate simple primary keys in the link column | russss 45057 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2018-04-15T21:56:15Z | 2018-04-18T08:40:37Z | 2018-04-18T01:13:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/209 | When there's a simple (single-column) primary key, it looks weird to duplicate it in the link column. This change removes the second PK column and treats the link column as if it were the PK column from a header/sorting perspective. This might make it a bit more difficult to tell what the link for the row is, I'm not sure yet. I feel like the alternative is to change the link column to just have the text "view" or something, instead of repeating the PK. (I doubt it makes much more sense with compound PKs.) Bonus change in this PR: fix urlencoding of links in the displayed HTML. Before: After: |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/209/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
274284246 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTUyODcwMDMw | 104 | [WIP] Add publish to heroku support | jacobian 21148 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2017-11-15T19:56:22Z | 2017-11-21T20:55:05Z | 2017-11-21T20:55:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/104 | Refs #90 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/104/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);