issues
10 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "closed_at" is on date 2019-06-24, repo = 107914493 and type = "issue" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
459714943 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk3MTQ5NDM= | 525 | Add section on sqite-utils enable-fts to the search documentation | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | 2 | 2019-06-24T06:39:16Z | 2019-06-24T16:36:35Z | 2019-06-24T16:29:43Z | OWNER | https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/full_text_search.html already has a section about csvs-to-sqlite, sqlite-utils is even more relevant. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/525/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
272391665 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzIzOTE2NjU= | 48 | Switch to ujson | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2017-11-08T23:50:29Z | 2019-06-24T06:57:54Z | 2019-06-24T06:57:43Z | OWNER | ujson is already a dependency of Sanic, and should be quite a bit faster. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/48/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
317714268 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTc3MTQyNjg= | 238 | External metadata.json | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2018-04-25T17:02:30Z | 2019-06-24T06:52:55Z | 2019-06-24T06:52:45Z | OWNER | A frustration I'm having with https://register-of-members-interests.datasettes.com/ is that I keep coming up with new canned queries but I don't want to redeploy the whole thing just to add them to Maybe Datasette could optionally take a |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/238/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
340730961 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDA3MzA5NjE= | 340 | Embrace black | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2018-07-12T17:32:29Z | 2019-06-24T06:50:27Z | 2019-06-24T06:50:26Z | OWNER | Run black against everything. Then set up CI to fail if code doesn't conform to black's style. Here's how Starlette does this:
And here's an example of a test run that failed: https://travis-ci.org/encode/starlette/jobs/403172478 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/340/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
276455748 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzY0NTU3NDg= | 146 | datasette publish gcloud | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2017-11-23T18:55:03Z | 2019-06-24T06:48:20Z | 2019-06-24T06:48:20Z | OWNER | See also #103 It looks like you can start a Google Cloud VM with a "docker container" option - and the Google Cloud Registry is easy to push containers to. So it would be feasible to have https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/docs/pushing-and-pulling |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/146/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
275125805 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzUxMjU4MDU= | 124 | Option to open readonly but not immutable | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2017-11-19T02:11:03Z | 2019-06-24T06:43:46Z | 2019-06-24T06:43:46Z | OWNER | Immutable assumes no other process can modify the file. An option to open reqdonly instead would enable other processes to update the file in place. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/124/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
274315193 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzQzMTUxOTM= | 106 | Document how pagination works | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2017-11-15T21:44:32Z | 2019-06-24T06:42:33Z | 2019-06-24T06:42:33Z | OWNER | I made a start at that in this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15691926 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/106/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323716411 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM3MTY0MTE= | 267 | Documentation for URL hashing, redirects and cache policy | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2018-05-16T17:29:01Z | 2019-06-24T06:41:02Z | 2019-06-24T06:41:02Z | OWNER | See my comments on #258 for a starting point |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/267/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
329147284 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjkxNDcyODQ= | 305 | Add contributor guidelines to docs | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2018-06-04T17:25:30Z | 2019-06-24T06:40:19Z | 2019-06-24T06:40:19Z | OWNER | https://channels.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html is a nice example of this done well. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/305/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
324188953 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjQxODg5NTM= | 272 | Port Datasette to ASGI | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 42 | 2018-05-17T21:16:32Z | 2019-06-24T04:54:15Z | 2019-06-24T03:33:06Z | OWNER | Datasette doesn't take much advantage of Sanic, and I'm increasingly having to work around parts of it because of idiosyncrasies that are specific to Datasette - caring about the exact order of querystring arguments for example. Since Datasette is GET-only our needs from a web framework are actually pretty slim. This becomes more important as I expand the plugins #14 framework. Am I sure I want the plugin ecosystem to depend on a Sanic if I might move away from it in the future? If Datasette wasn't all about async/await I would use WSGI, but today it makes more sense to use ASGI. I'd like to be confident that switching to ASGI would still give me the excellent performance that Sanic provides. https://github.com/django/asgiref/blob/master/specs/asgi.rst |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/272/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);