issues
3 rows where author_association = "OWNER", comments = 21 and repo = 107914493 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
777333388 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NzczMzMzODg= | 1168 | Mechanism for storing metadata in _metadata tables | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 21 | 2021-01-01T18:47:27Z | 2023-09-28T18:29:05Z | OWNER | Original title: Perhaps metadata should all live in a Inspired by #1150 - metadata should be exposed as an API, and for large Datasette instances that API may need to be paginated. So why not expose it through an in-memory database table? One catch to this: plugins. #860 aims to add a plugin hook for metadata. But if the metadata comes from an in-memory table, how do the plugins interact with it? The need to paginate over metadata does make a plugin hook that returns metadata for an individual table seem less wise, since we don't want to have to do 10,000 plugin hook invocations to show a list of all metadata. If those plugins write directly to the in-memory table how can their contributions survive the server restarting? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1168/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1243498298 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5KHkc6 | 1746 | Switch documentation theme to Furo | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 21 | 2022-05-20T18:42:17Z | 2022-05-20T21:28:29Z | 2022-05-20T21:28:29Z | OWNER | https://github.com/pradyunsg/furo I just did this for |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1746/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
657572753 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NTc1NzI3NTM= | 894 | ?sort=colname~numeric to sort by by column cast to real | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 21 | 2020-07-15T18:47:48Z | 2021-08-20T02:07:53Z | OWNER | If a text column actually contains numbers, being able to "sort by column, treated as numeric" would be really useful. Probably depends on column actions enabled by #690 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/894/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);