issues
4 rows where author_association = "OWNER", state = "open", "updated_at" is on date 2018-07-10 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
318490133 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTg0OTAxMzM= | 241 | Default datasette logging format should be JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-27T17:32:48Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:40Z | OWNER | Structured logs are better. Datasette should default to outputting it's HTTP access log lines as newline delimited JSON instead of the Sanic default format it uses at the moment. For improved greppability these logs should have keys ordered in a consistent way. Python's JSON module can do this with ordered dictionaries. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/241/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
314771615 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTQ3NzE2MTU= | 218 | Support custom unit display in order to handle "$10,000" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-16T18:39:31Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:38Z | OWNER | I tried to get Datasette to display It would be neat if there was a mechanism for specifying a custom unit display - maybe something like this:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/218/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
312395790 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTU3OTA= | 197 | Ability to sort by more than one column | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-09T05:13:30Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:37Z | OWNER | Split off from #189. I'd like to support "sort by X descending, then by Y ascending if there are dupes for X" as well. Suggested syntax for that:
we currently only allow one argument to be sent. We should allow as many arguments as there are columns, for example:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/197/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
312396095 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTYwOTU= | 198 | Ability to sort with nulls last | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-09T05:15:40Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:37Z | OWNER | Split off from #189 Here's how to do that in SQL: https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight-2628db9?sql=select+rowid%2C+*+from+%5Bnfl-wide-receivers%2Fadvanced-historical%5D%0D%0Aorder+by+case+when+career_ranypa+is+null+then+1+else+0+end%2C+career_ranypa%2C+rowid
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/198/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);