issues
1 row where body = "The `conversions=` parameter works like this at the moment: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/3.23/python-api.html#converting-column-values-using-sql-functions ```python db["places"].insert( {"name": "Wales", "geometry": wkt}, conversions={"geometry": "GeomFromText(?, 4326)"}, ) ``` This proposal is to support values in that dictionary that are objects, not strings, which can represent more complex conversions - spun out from #399. New proposed mechanism: ```python from sqlite_utils.utils import LongitudeLatitude db["places"].insert( { "name": "London", "point": (-0.118092, 51.509865) }, conversions={"point": LongitudeLatitude}, ) ``` Here `LongitudeLatitude` is a magical value which does TWO things: it sets up the `GeomFromText(?, 4326)` SQL function, and it handles converting the `(51.509865, -0.118092)` tuple into a `POINT({} {})` string. This would involve a change to the `conversions=` contract - where it usually expects a SQL string fragment, but it can also take an object which combines that SQL string fragment with a Python conversion function. Best of all... this resolves the `lat, lon` v.s. `lon, lat` dilemma because you can use `from sqlite_utils.utils import LongitudeLatitude` OR `from sqlite_utils.utils import LatitudeLongitude` depending on which you prefer! _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030739566_" and state = "open" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1125297737 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5DEq5J | 402 | Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2022-02-06T19:47:41Z | 2022-02-16T10:18:55Z | OWNER | The
New proposed mechanism: ```python from sqlite_utils.utils import LongitudeLatitude db["places"].insert(
{
"name": "London",
"point": (-0.118092, 51.509865)
},
conversions={"point": LongitudeLatitude},
)
This would involve a change to the Best of all... this resolves the Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030739566 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);