issues
7 rows where "closed_at" is on date 2017-12-10, repo = 107914493, state = "closed" and "updated_at" is on date 2017-12-10 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
275476839 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzU0NzY4Mzk= | 138 | Per-database and per-table metadata, probably using data-package | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2017-11-20T19:50:10Z | 2017-12-10T03:08:36Z | 2017-12-10T03:08:26Z | OWNER | Ability to annotate databases and tables with extra metadata describing their purpose, providing source and licensing information and describing individual columns. http://frictionlessdata.io/specs/data-package/ looks like a great format for this, see #105 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/138/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
273878873 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzM4Nzg4NzM= | 91 | Option to serve databases from a different prefix, serve regular content elsewhere | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2017-11-14T17:32:46Z | 2017-12-10T03:07:58Z | 2017-12-10T03:07:53Z | OWNER | It would be useful if the databases themselves could be served from a prefix e.g.
Now my database is at This would free up the rest of the URL namespace for other things. Maybe we could have an option to serve static content from a known folder e.g.
Now a hit to This would make it trivial to package up entire HTML/CSS/JS apps with one or more underlying SQLite databases. Running without |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/91/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
273846123 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzM4NDYxMjM= | 90 | datasette publish heroku | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 8 | 2017-11-14T16:01:39Z | 2017-12-10T03:06:34Z | 2017-12-10T03:05:48Z | OWNER | Heroku has Docker container support so this should not be too hard: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/container-registry-and-runtime See also #59 This should work exactly like the existing “datasette publish now....” command except it would be “datasette publish heroku...” |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/90/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
273026602 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzMwMjY2MDI= | 52 | Solution for temporarily uploading DB so it can be built by docker | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2017-11-10T18:55:25Z | 2017-12-10T03:02:57Z | 2017-12-10T03:02:57Z | OWNER | For the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/52/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
268591332 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNjg1OTEzMzI= | 42 | Homepage UI for editing metadata file | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2017-10-26T00:22:03Z | 2017-12-10T03:02:14Z | 2017-12-10T03:02:14Z | OWNER | Since we are going to have a metadata file which sets the title/description/etc for each database, why not allow you to run the app in —dev mode which makes the homepage into a WYSIWYG editor that can save to that file format. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/42/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
280744309 | MDU6SXNzdWUyODA3NDQzMDk= | 169 | Release v0.14 with templates and static files features | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Custom templates edition 2949431 | 1 | 2017-12-09T18:52:48Z | 2017-12-10T02:04:56Z | 2017-12-10T02:04:56Z | OWNER | Everything in this milestone https://github.com/simonw/datasette/milestone/6 - plus various other fixes: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/0.13...6bdfcf60760c27e29ff34692d06e62b36aeecc56 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/169/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
280315352 | MDU6SXNzdWUyODAzMTUzNTI= | 167 | Nasty bug: last column not being correctly displayed | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Custom templates edition 2949431 | 6 | 2017-12-07T23:23:46Z | 2017-12-10T01:00:21Z | 2017-12-10T01:00:20Z | OWNER | e.g. https://datasette-bwnojrhmmg.now.sh/dk3-bde9a9a/dk?source__contains=http The JSON output shows that the column is there, but is being displayed incorrectly: https://datasette-bwnojrhmmg.now.sh/dk3-bde9a9a/dk.jsono?source__contains=http |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/167/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);