issues

Table actions

2 rows where "closed_at" is on date 2020-05-02, comments = 4 and repo = 207052882 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)

type 1

state 1

repo 1

  • github-to-sqlite · 2 ✖
id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association pull_request body repo type active_lock_reason performed_via_github_app reactions draft state_reason
611284481 MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyODQ0ODE= 38 [Feature Request] Support Repo Name in Search 🥺 zzeleznick 5779832 closed 0     4 2020-05-02T22:08:51Z 2020-05-03T02:34:32Z 2020-05-02T23:15:11Z NONE  

Description

Per your v2.2 release tweet I played with the demo, but the output did not match my expectations.

Expected Behavior

Expected a search query for "twitter" contained within the repo column to return non-zero results.

Actual Behavior

😭 0 rows where repo contains "twitter" sorted by starred_at descending

Best Explanation

Per the table schema (see appendix) repo is of type INTEGER which built from repo_id and does not expose the repo name in search.

Desired Behavior

Given that searching for "206156866" is less intuitive than "twitter", it would be great to support this via extending the search capabilities or by adding an additional column.

✅ 104 rows where repo contains "twitter" ❌ 104 rows where repo contains "206156866" sorted by starred_at descending

Appendix

CREATE TABLE [stars] ( [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [starred_at] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([user], [repo]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_stars_repo] ON [stars] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_stars_user] ON [stars] ([user]);

 github-to-sqlite 207052882 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/38/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed
609950090 MDU6SXNzdWU2MDk5NTAwOTA= 33 Fall back to authentication via ENV garethr 2029 closed 0     4 2020-04-30T12:58:14Z 2020-05-02T18:46:10Z 2020-05-02T18:45:37Z NONE  

Would you accept a PR that falls back to looking for an environment variable for the GitHub token? Specifically a change here: https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/c34d5a18bfc41fa08755ba3d5cf9fe09ff204238/github_to_sqlite/cli.py#L271

I'd like to use github-to-sqlite in a GitHub Action workflow and this would be simpler than trying to fill out the prompt or generate a file with sensitive content.

Wanted to check first, I'm happy to submit a PR with tests and updates to the docs.

github-to-sqlite 207052882 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/33/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
                ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
                ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
                ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
                ON [issues] ([user]);