issues
10 rows where comments = 0, repo = 207052882 and state = "open" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1505411725 | I_kwDODFdgUs5ZusKN | 78 | self-hosted or corp github enterprise | ebdavison 549431 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-12-20T22:51:45Z | 2022-12-20T22:51:45Z | NONE | We use github enterprise at work and I would like to use this tool to pull info from that site rather than the public github.com instance. Is there an option for this? If not, can one be added for a custom repo URL? |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/78/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1410548368 | I_kwDODFdgUs5UE0KQ | 77 | Feature: Support GitHub discussions | frosencrantz 631242 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-10-16T16:53:38Z | 2022-10-16T16:53:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @simonw I've been a happy user of this tool. Thank you for writing it and sharing it. I wanted to suggest a feature request to support Discussions. For example the VisiData project has discussions https://github.com/saulpw/visidata/discussions , and it would be useful if there was a way to pull that data into the database. However, I'm not offering a pull request. |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/77/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1363244199 | I_kwDODFdgUs5RQXSn | 75 | Fetch repos doesn't support organisations | OverkillGuy 2757699 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-06T12:55:06Z | 2022-09-06T12:55:06Z | NONE | Say I want to get all my Github Org's repos info, for data analysis. Not just the public repos, but also the private/internal repos. The endpoints are different for organisation, and this tool doesn't take it into account: https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/ace13ec3d98090d99bd71871c286a4a612c96a50/github_to_sqlite/utils.py#L453 https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/ace13ec3d98090d99bd71871c286a4a612c96a50/github_to_sqlite/utils.py#L455 The endpoints for organisation repos is instead (source):
Let's add support for organisations repo scraping. |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/75/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1149402080 | PR_kwDODFdgUs4zaUta | 70 | scrape-dependents: enable paging through package menu option if present | stanbiryukov 36061055 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-24T15:07:25Z | 2022-02-24T15:07:25Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/pulls/70 | Some repos organize network dependents by a Package toggle. This PR adds the ability to page through those options and scrape underlying dependents. |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/70/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
1013506559 | PR_kwDODFdgUs4skaNS | 68 | Add support for retrieving teams / members | philwills 68329 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-10-01T15:55:02Z | 2021-10-01T15:59:53Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/pulls/68 | Adds a method for retrieving all the teams within an organisation and all the members in those teams. The latter is stored as a join table |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/68/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
981690086 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzIxNjg2NzIx | 67 | Replacing step ID key with step_id | jshcmpbll 16374374 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-08-28T01:26:41Z | 2021-08-28T01:27:00Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/pulls/67 | Workflows that have an e.g.
ChangesI'm proposing that the key for Special thanks to @sarcasticadmin @egiffen and @ruebenramirez for helping a bit on this 😄 |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/67/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
897212458 | MDU6SXNzdWU4OTcyMTI0NTg= | 63 | Ability to fetch commits from branches other than the default | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-05-20T17:58:08Z | 2021-05-20T17:58:08Z | MEMBER | This tool is currently almost entirely ignorant of the concept of branches. One example: you can't retrieve commits from any branch other than the default (usually main). |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/63/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
797784080 | MDU6SXNzdWU3OTc3ODQwODA= | 62 | Stargazers and workflows commands always require an auth file when using GITHUB_TOKEN | frosencrantz 631242 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-01-31T18:56:05Z | 2021-01-31T18:56:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Requested fix in https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/pull/59 The stargazers and workflows commands always require an auth file, even when using a |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/62/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
703216044 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MDMyMTYwNDQ= | 49 | Feature: gists and starred gists | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-09-17T02:30:52Z | 2020-09-17T02:30:52Z | MEMBER | github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/49/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
599776345 | MDU6SXNzdWU1OTk3NzYzNDU= | 24 | Feature idea: github-to-sqlite everything ... | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-04-14T18:34:00Z | 2020-04-14T18:34:00Z | MEMBER | At the moment if you want to pull all your repos, issues, issues comments etc you have to do it with a sequence of separate commands. Consider adding a |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/24/reactions", "total_count": 7, "+1": 7, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);