issues
4 rows where comments = 10, milestone = 3268330, state = "closed" and type = "issue" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
957310278 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTAyNzg= | 1409 | `default_allow_sql` setting (a re-imagining of the old `allow_sql` setting) | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2021-07-31T19:48:56Z | 2023-01-07T18:06:01Z | 2023-01-05T00:51:31Z | OWNER | In 49d6d2f7b0f6cb02e25022e1c9403811f1fa0a7c as part of #813 I removed the I don't think this was the right decision. Disabling custom SQL is an important security capability, and explaining how to do it using permissions is significantly more complex than letting people know they can add So I want to bring that setting back - maybe with a different, better name - and have it modify the default for that option if the permissions system doesn't have an opinion. That way people can still use the setting but then use permissions to allow specific signed-in users access to execute SQL. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1409/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
639072811 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzkwNzI4MTE= | 849 | Rename master branch to main | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2020-06-15T19:05:54Z | 2022-10-27T13:57:08Z | 2020-09-15T20:37:14Z | OWNER | I was waiting for consensus to form around this (and kind-of hoping for I've seen convincing arguments against |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/849/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1170355774 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FwjY- | 1661 | Remove Hashed URL mode | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2022-03-15T23:13:56Z | 2022-03-19T00:37:37Z | 2022-03-19T00:37:36Z | OWNER | It's now handled by a plugin instead: - #647 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/3 https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls Sub-tasks:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1661/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
497170355 | MDU6SXNzdWU0OTcxNzAzNTU= | 576 | Documented internals API for use in plugins | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2019-09-23T15:28:50Z | 2021-01-05T23:12:51Z | 2021-01-05T23:12:37Z | OWNER | Quite a few of the plugin hooks make a This means it should provide a documented, stable API so that plugin authors can rely on it. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/576/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);