issues
2 rows where comments = 2, type = "issue" and user = 2181410 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
617323873 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTczMjM4NzM= | 766 | Enable wildcard-searches by default | clausjuhl 2181410 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-05-13T10:14:48Z | 2021-03-05T16:35:21Z | NONE | Hi Simon. It seems that datasette currently has wildcard-searches disabled by default (along with the boolean search-options, NEAR-queries and more, and despite the docs). If I try out the search-url provided in the docs (https://fara.datasettes.com/fara/FARA_All_ShortForms?_search=manafort), it does not handle wildcard-searches, and I'm unable to make it work on my datasette-instance. I would argue that wildcard-searches is such a standard query, that it should be enabled by default. Requiring "_searchmode=raw" when using prefix-searches seems unnecessary. Plus: What happens to non-ascii searches when using "_searchmode=raw"? Is the "escape_fts"-function from datasette.utils ignored? Thanks! /Claus |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/766/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
448189298 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDgxODkyOTg= | 486 | Ability to add extra routes and related templates | clausjuhl 2181410 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-05-24T14:04:25Z | 2019-05-24T14:43:28Z | 2019-05-24T14:43:09Z | NONE | Hi Simon Thank for an excellent job! Datasette is such an obviously good idea (once you have that idea!) and so well done. The only thing that I miss, is the ability to add extras routes (with associated jinja2-templates). For most of the datasets, that I would like to publish, I would also like at least a page, that describes the data (semantics, provenance, biases...) and a page explaining our cookie- and privacy-policies (which would allows us to use something like Goggle Analytics). |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/486/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);