issues
9 rows where "created_at" is on date 2018-05-16 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
323658641 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NTg2NDE= | 262 | Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 27 | 2018-05-16T14:55:42Z | 2023-03-29T06:22:22Z | OWNER | Datasette views currently work by creating a set of data that should be returned as JSON, then defining an additional, optional This Example of how that is used today: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/2b79f2bdeb1efa86e0756e741292d625f91cb93d/datasette/views/table.py#L672-L704 With features like Facets in #255 I'm beginning to want to move more items into the But... as an API user, I want to still optionally be able to access that information. Solution: Add a Then redefine as many of the current This could allow the JSON representation to be slimmed down further (removing e.g. the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
323718842 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM3MTg4NDI= | 268 | Mechanism for ranking results from SQLite full-text search | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 12 | 2018-05-16T17:36:40Z | 2022-01-13T22:21:28Z | OWNER | This isn't particularly straight-forward - all the more reason for Datasette to implement it for you. This article is helpful: http://charlesleifer.com/blog/using-sqlite-full-text-search-with-python/ |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/268/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
323681589 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2ODE1ODk= | 266 | Export to CSV | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 27 | 2018-05-16T15:50:24Z | 2021-06-17T18:14:24Z | 2018-06-18T06:05:25Z | OWNER | Datasette needs to be able to export data to CSV. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/266/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323671577 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NzE1Nzc= | 263 | Facets should not execute for ?shape=array|object | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2018-05-16T15:26:13Z | 2021-06-02T02:54:34Z | 2021-06-02T02:54:34Z | OWNER | Split off from #255 - there's no point executing the facet SQL for the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/263/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323716411 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM3MTY0MTE= | 267 | Documentation for URL hashing, redirects and cache policy | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2018-05-16T17:29:01Z | 2019-06-24T06:41:02Z | 2019-06-24T06:41:02Z | OWNER | See my comments on #258 for a starting point |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/267/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323677499 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2Nzc0OTk= | 265 | Add links to example Datasette instances to appropiate places in docs | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2018-05-16T15:40:20Z | 2018-06-18T15:52:15Z | 2018-06-18T15:52:15Z | OWNER | Links to working examples would really help, especially on these pages: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/265/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323673899 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NzM4OTk= | 264 | Make it possible to customize various facet settings | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2018-05-16T15:31:34Z | 2018-05-18T06:18:00Z | 2018-05-18T05:11:52Z | OWNER | The new Facets implementation from #255 includes several hard-coded settings which should be made configurable somehow: Number of rows to return in a facet (maybe this should also be an option that can be set via quersytring argument, e.g. Time limit for executing a facet: Maximum unique values returned in order for a column to be suggested as a facet: Time limit for calculating if a column should be a suggested facet: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/264/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323726888 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM3MjY4ODg= | 269 | If a facet fails due to timing out, let the user know somehow | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2018-05-16T18:01:47Z | 2018-05-18T06:11:46Z | 2018-05-18T06:11:46Z | OWNER | Refs #255 - right now facets fail silently if the user requested them but they take longer than 200ms to calculate - see also #264 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/269/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
323459939 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTg4MzEyNDEx | 261 | Facets improvements plus suggested facets | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2018-05-16T03:52:39Z | 2018-05-16T15:27:26Z | 2018-05-16T15:27:25Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/261 | Refs #255 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/261/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);