issues
117 rows where milestone = 3268330 sorted by assignee
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee ▼ | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1483250004 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YaJlU | 1936 | Fix /db/table/-/upsert in the API explorer | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2022-12-08T00:59:34Z | 2022-12-08T01:36:02Z | OWNER | Split from: - #1931 - #1878 This is a bit tricky because the code needs to figure out what the primary keys are for an item, and whether or not |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1936/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1487738738 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy | 1942 | Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-12-10T01:08:53Z | 2022-12-10T01:11:30Z | OWNER | Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say "I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page"?
This idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too. Refs: - #1711 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1529707837 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5bLX09 | 1988 | Reconsider pattern where plugins could break existing template context | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2023-01-11T21:13:43Z | 2023-01-11T21:25:05Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-write/issues/6#issuecomment-1379490596 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1988/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1558644003 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5c5wUj | 2006 | Teach `datasette publish` to pin to `datasette<1.0` in a 0.x release | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2023-01-26T19:17:40Z | 2023-01-26T19:20:53Z | OWNER | I just realized that when I ship Datasette 1.0 there may be automated deployments out there which could deploy the 1.0 version by accident, potentially breaking any customizations that aren't compatible with the 1.0 changes. I can hopefully help avoid that by shipping one last entry in the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2006/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1563264257 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dLYUB | 2010 | Row page should default to card view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-01-30T21:49:37Z | 2023-01-30T21:52:06Z | OWNER | Datasette currently uses the same table layout on the row pages as it does on the table pages: https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages?_sort=name&name__exact=datasette-column-inspect https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages/datasette-column-inspect If you shrink down to mobile width you get this instead, on both of those pages: I think that view, which I think of as the "card view", is plain better if you're looking at just a single row - and it (or a variant of it) should be the default presentation on the row page. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2010/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1571207083 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dprer | 2016 | Database metadata fields like description are not available in the index page template's context | palewire 9993 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-02-05T02:25:53Z | 2023-02-05T22:56:43Z | NONE | When looping through |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2016/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1615692818 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5gTYQS | 2035 | Potential feature: special support for `?a=1&a=2` on the query page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 14 | 2023-03-08T18:05:03Z | 2023-03-31T16:09:08Z | OWNER | From a discussion on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/996877076982415491/1082789517062320138 The key idea is to make it easier for people to implement What if you could add |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2035/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1641013220 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5hz9_k | 2045 | First column on a view page has no facet option in cog menu | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2023-03-26T18:02:47Z | 2023-03-26T18:02:48Z | OWNER | e.g. first column on this page - cog menu has no option to facet. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2045/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1823393475 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5srsbD | 2119 | database color shows only on index page, not other pages | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2023-07-27T00:19:39Z | 2023-08-11T05:25:45Z | 2023-08-11T05:16:24Z | OWNER | I think this has been a bug for a long time. https://latest.datasette.io/ currently shows: Those colors are based on a hash of the database name. But when you click through to https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures It's red on all sub-pages too. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2119/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1838469176 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5tlNA4 | 2127 | Context base class to support documenting the context | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2023-08-07T00:01:02Z | 2023-08-10T01:30:25Z | OWNER | This idea first came up here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2112#issuecomment-1652751140 If Also refs: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1510 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2127/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1840324765 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsSCd | 2129 | CSV ?sql= should indicate errors | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-08-07T23:13:04Z | 2023-08-08T02:02:21Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2118#issuecomment-1668688947 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2129/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1840417903 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsoxv | 2131 | Refactor code that supports templates_considered comment | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-08-08T01:28:36Z | 2023-08-09T15:27:41Z | OWNER | I ended up duplicating it here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7532feb424b1dce614351e21b2265c04f9669fe2/datasette/views/database.py#L164-L167 I think it should move to |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2131/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1898927976 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5xL1do | 2186 | Mechanism for register_output_renderer hooks to access full count | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2023-09-15T18:57:54Z | 2023-09-15T19:27:59Z | OWNER | The cause of this bug: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-export-notebook/issues/17 Is that That field is no longer available by default - the It would be useful if plugins like this could access the total count on demand, should they need to. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2186/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1940346034 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5zp1Sy | 2199 | Detailed upgrade instructions for metadata.yaml -> datasette.yaml | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 7 | 2023-10-12T16:21:25Z | 2023-10-12T22:08:42Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2190#issuecomment-1759947021 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2199/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
324188953 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjQxODg5NTM= | 272 | Port Datasette to ASGI | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 42 | 2018-05-17T21:16:32Z | 2019-06-24T04:54:15Z | 2019-06-24T03:33:06Z | OWNER | Datasette doesn't take much advantage of Sanic, and I'm increasingly having to work around parts of it because of idiosyncrasies that are specific to Datasette - caring about the exact order of querystring arguments for example. Since Datasette is GET-only our needs from a web framework are actually pretty slim. This becomes more important as I expand the plugins #14 framework. Am I sure I want the plugin ecosystem to depend on a Sanic if I might move away from it in the future? If Datasette wasn't all about async/await I would use WSGI, but today it makes more sense to use ASGI. I'd like to be confident that switching to ASGI would still give me the excellent performance that Sanic provides. https://github.com/django/asgiref/blob/master/specs/asgi.rst |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/272/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||
456568880 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1Njg4ODA= | 509 | Support opening multiple databases with the same stem | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-06-15T19:32:00Z | 2020-12-22T20:04:35Z | 2020-12-22T20:04:35Z | OWNER | e.g. I should be able to do this:
This currently errors because you can't have two databases taking the Instead, how about in this particular case assigning the second database |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/509/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||
459587155 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkwODk3MTA0 | 518 | Port Datasette from Sanic to ASGI + Uvicorn | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2019-06-23T15:18:42Z | 2019-06-24T13:42:50Z | 2019-06-24T03:13:09Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/518 | Most of the code here was fleshed out in comments on #272 (Port Datasette to ASGI) - this pull request will track the final pieces:
|
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/518/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);