issues
11 rows where milestone = 4471010 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, updated_at, closed_at, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
465001185 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMDExODU= | 549 | Send pull request to the repo that the _table.html template will break | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 1 | 2019-07-07T22:45:17Z | 2019-07-08T03:36:46Z | 2019-07-08T03:36:45Z | OWNER | Bump this to 0.29 https://github.com/simonw/salaries-datasette/blob/master/requirements/base.txt And rename https://github.com/simonw/salaries-datasette/blob/master/templates/_rows_and_columns.html to _table.html |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/549/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
464990184 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjQ5OTAxODQ= | 547 | Release notes for 0.29 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 2 | 2019-07-07T20:30:28Z | 2019-07-08T03:31:59Z | 2019-07-08T03:31:59Z | OWNER | There's a lot of stuff... https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/0.28...master |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/547/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
445868234 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDU4NjgyMzQ= | 478 | Make it so Docker build doesn't delay PyPI release | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 3 | 2019-05-19T21:52:10Z | 2019-07-08T03:30:41Z | 2019-07-07T20:03:20Z | OWNER | Datasette automated releases currently include building a Docker image that has a full custom-compiled version of SQLite and SpatiaLite. This takes ages! I still want to publish this Docker image (to https://hub.docker.com/r/datasetteproject/datasette/tags ) but I'd like it if this wasn't a blocker on pushing the new package to PyPI. Ideally PyPI publish would happen first. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/478/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
464868844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjQ4Njg4NDQ= | 543 | datasette publish option for setting plugin configuration secrets | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 3 | 2019-07-06T16:21:23Z | 2019-07-08T02:06:34Z | 2019-07-08T02:06:34Z | OWNER | Follow-on from #538 - the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/543/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
464894812 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjk1MDY1Nzk2 | 544 | --plugin-secret option | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 1 | 2019-07-06T22:18:20Z | 2019-07-08T02:06:31Z | 2019-07-08T02:06:31Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/544 | Refs #543
|
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/544/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
464994105 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjQ5OTQxMDU= | 548 | Add datasette-cors and datasette-auth-github plugins to Ecosystem page | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 0 | 2019-07-07T21:14:14Z | 2019-07-08T02:02:36Z | 2019-07-08T02:02:36Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/548/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
465002978 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMDI5Nzg= | 550 | Pull m2m faceting out of master so we can ship a release without it | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 1 | 2019-07-07T23:10:48Z | 2019-07-07T23:21:22Z | 2019-07-07T23:21:22Z | OWNER | After spending some time with #495 I believe I need to make some pretty major changes to how m2m faceting works. I don't want it to block the release of ASGI Datasette so I'm going to revert it back out of master for the moment and merge it back in after the release has gone out. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/550/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
446433735 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDY0MzM3MzU= | 482 | Example of a custom facet plugin is incorrect | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 0 | 2019-05-21T06:12:47Z | 2019-07-07T23:19:10Z | 2019-07-07T23:19:10Z | OWNER | The function signatures are wrong on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/0.28/plugins.html#register-facet-classes The new signatures are: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/482/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
453829910 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTM4Mjk5MTA= | 505 | Add white-space: pre-wrap to SQL create statement | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 0 | 2019-06-08T19:59:56Z | 2019-07-07T20:26:55Z | 2019-07-07T20:26:55Z | OWNER | Right now a super-long CREATE TABLE statement causes the table page to be even wider than the table itself: Adding |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/505/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||
464905894 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjQ5MDU4OTQ= | 545 | Fix header on 404 page | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 1 | 2019-07-07T01:47:40Z | 2019-07-07T20:26:55Z | 2019-07-07T20:26:55Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/545/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
445875242 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjgwMjA1NTAy | 480 | Split pypi and docker travis tasks | glasnt 813732 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.29 4471010 | 1 | 2019-05-19T23:14:37Z | 2019-07-07T20:03:20Z | 2019-07-07T20:03:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/480 | Resolves #478 This should work, but because this is a change that'll only really be testable on a) this repo, b) master branch, this might fail fast if I didn't get the configurations right. Looking at #478 it should just be as simple as splitting out the docker and pypi processes into separate jobs, but it might end up being more complicated than that, depending on what pre-processes the pypi deployment needs, and how travisci treats deployment steps without scripts in general. |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/480/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);