issues
11 rows where milestone = 5471110 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, updated_at, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
625930207 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjU5MzAyMDc= | 770 | register_output_renderer can_render mechanism | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 4 | 2020-05-27T18:29:14Z | 2020-05-28T05:57:16Z | 2020-05-28T05:57:16Z | OWNER | I would like is the ability for renderers to opt-in / opt-out of being displayed as options on the page. https://www.niche-museums.com/browse/museums for example shows a atom link because the datasette-atom plugin is installed... but clicking it will give you a 400 error because the correct columns are not present. Here's the code that passes a list of renderers to the template: A renderer is currently defined as a two-key dictionary:
One catch: what arguments should be passed to the UPDATE: now calling it Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/581#issuecomment-634856748 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/770/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
611540797 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTE1NDA3OTc= | 751 | Ability to set custom default _size on a per-table basis | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 4 | 2020-05-04T00:13:03Z | 2020-05-28T05:00:22Z | 2020-05-28T05:00:20Z | OWNER | I have some tables where I'd like the default page size to be 10, without affecting the rest of my Datasette instance. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/751/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
626001501 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYwMDE1MDE= | 773 | All plugin hooks should have unit tests | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 2 | 2020-05-27T20:17:41Z | 2020-05-28T04:12:11Z | 2020-05-28T04:09:25Z | OWNER | Four hooks currently missing tests:
``` $ pytest -k test_plugin_hooks_have_tests -vv ====================================== test session starts ====================================== platform darwin -- Python 3.7.7, pytest-5.2.4, py-1.8.1, pluggy-0.13.1 -- /Users/simon/.local/share/virtualenvs/datasette-AWNrQs95/bin/python cachedir: .pytest_cache rootdir: /Users/simon/Dropbox/Development/datasette, inifile: pytest.ini plugins: asyncio-0.10.0 collected 486 items / 475 deselected / 11 selected tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[asgi_wrapper] XPASS [ 9%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[extra_body_script] XPASS [ 18%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[extra_css_urls] XPASS [ 27%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[extra_js_urls] XPASS [ 36%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[extra_template_vars] XPASS [ 45%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[prepare_connection] XPASS [ 54%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[prepare_jinja2_environment] XFAIL [ 63%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[publish_subcommand] XFAIL [ 72%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[register_facet_classes] XFAIL [ 81%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[register_output_renderer] XFAIL [ 90%] tests/test_plugins.py::test_plugin_hooks_have_tests[render_cell] XPASS [100%] ========================= 475 deselected, 4 xfailed, 7 xpassed in 1.70s ========================= Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/771#issuecomment-634915104 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/773/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
626163974 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYxNjM5NzQ= | 776 | register_output_renderer render callback should be optionally awaitable | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 1 | 2020-05-28T02:26:29Z | 2020-05-28T02:43:36Z | 2020-05-28T02:43:36Z | OWNER | In #581 I made a bunch of improvements to this, including making But... it needs to be able to Original idea here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/645#issuecomment-560036740 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/776/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
502993509 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MDI5OTM1MDk= | 581 | Redesign register_output_renderer callback | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 24 | 2019-10-05T17:43:23Z | 2020-05-28T02:24:14Z | 2020-05-28T02:21:50Z | OWNER | In building https://github.com/simonw/datasette-atom it became clear that the callback function (which currently accepts just args, data and view_name) would also benefit from access to a mechanism to render templates and a To maintain backwards compatibility with existing plugins, we can introspect the callback function to see if it wants those new arguments or not. At a minimum I want to make |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/581/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
620969465 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjA5Njk0NjU= | 767 | Allow to specify a URL fragment for canned queries | rixx 2657547 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 2 | 2020-05-19T13:17:42Z | 2020-05-27T21:52:25Z | 2020-05-27T21:52:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Canned queries are very useful to direct users to prepared data and views. I like to use them with charts using datasette-vega a lot, because people get a direct impression at first glance. datasette-vega doesn't show up by default though, and users have to click through to it. Also, datasette-vega does not always guess the best way to render columns correctly though, so it would be nice if I could specify a URL fragment in my canned queries to make sure people see what I want them to see. My current workaround is to include a fragement link in |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/767/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
622672640 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDIxNDkxODEw | 768 | Use dirs_exist_ok=True | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 0 | 2020-05-21T17:53:44Z | 2020-05-27T20:21:56Z | 2020-05-21T17:53:51Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/768 | Refs #744 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/768/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
625922239 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDI0MDMyNDQ1 | 769 | Backport of Python 3.8 shutil.copytree | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 0 | 2020-05-27T18:17:15Z | 2020-05-27T20:21:56Z | 2020-05-27T18:17:44Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/769 | Closes #744 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/769/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
625991831 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDI0MDg1MjY0 | 772 | Test that plugin hooks are unit tested | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 0 | 2020-05-27T20:01:32Z | 2020-05-27T20:21:56Z | 2020-05-27T20:16:03Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/772 | Refs #771 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/772/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
616012427 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTYwMTI0Mjc= | 764 | Add PyPI project urls to setup.py | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 3 | 2020-05-11T16:23:08Z | 2020-05-27T20:21:36Z | 2020-05-11T18:28:55Z | OWNER | Spotted this example here:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/764/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
625980317 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjU5ODAzMTc= | 771 | Unit test that checks that all plugin hooks have corresponding unit tests | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 0.43 5471110 | 5 | 2020-05-27T19:42:35Z | 2020-05-27T20:21:36Z | 2020-05-27T20:17:13Z | OWNER | Turns out some hooks are missing unit test coverage: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/581#issuecomment-634893744_ |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/771/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);