issues
2 rows where "created_at" is on date 2018-05-14 and repo = 107914493 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
322787470 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjI3ODc0NzA= | 259 | inspect() should detect many-to-many relationships | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2018-05-14T12:03:58Z | 2019-05-23T03:55:37Z | 2019-05-23T03:55:37Z | OWNER | Relates to #255 - in particular supporting facets across M2M relationships. It should be possible for When rendering a table with a m2m relationship we could display the first X associated records as a comma separated list of hyperlinks in a new column on the table view, with a column name derived from the table on the other side. Since SQLite doesn't have RANK or an equivalent of https://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/12/02/how-to-number-rows-in-mysql/ this would be implemented as N+1 queries (one query per cell that we want to display an m2m summary). This should be OK in SQLite: https://sqlite.org/np1queryprob.html |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/259/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
322741659 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTg3NzcwMzQ1 | 258 | Add new metadata key persistent_urls which removes the hash from all database urls | philroche 247131 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2018-05-14T09:39:18Z | 2018-05-21T07:38:15Z | 2018-05-21T07:38:15Z | NONE | simonw/datasette/pulls/258 | Add new metadata key "persistent_urls" which removes the hash from all database urls when set to "true" This PR is just to gauge if this, or something like it, is something you would consider merging? I understand the reason why the substring of the hash is included in the url but there are some use cases where the urls should persist across deployments. For bookmarks for example or for scripts that use the JSON API. This is the initial commit for this feature. Tests and documentation updates to follow. |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/258/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);