issues

Table actions

3 rows where repo = 107914493, state = "closed" and user = 649467 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)

type 1

state 1

  • closed · 3 ✖

repo 1

  • datasette · 3 ✖
id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association pull_request body repo type active_lock_reason performed_via_github_app reactions draft state_reason
718521469 MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg1MjE0Njk= 1011 column name links broken in 0.50.1 mhalle 649467 closed 0     4 2020-10-10T03:37:51Z 2020-10-10T04:09:32Z 2020-10-10T03:52:07Z NONE  

I just upgraded from 0.49 to 0.50.1 and found that the links on column headers are broken.

If I inspect the source, they have a leading "//" (without host or port) rather than including base_url like other links on the page do. The links in the "gears" menu for each column do work.

I don't have custom templates for my project.

datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1011/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed
699947574 MDU6SXNzdWU2OTk5NDc1NzQ= 963 Currently selected array facets are not correctly persisted through hidden form fields mhalle 649467 closed 0   Datasette 0.49 5818042 1 2020-09-12T01:49:17Z 2020-09-12T21:54:29Z 2020-09-12T21:54:09Z NONE  

Faceted search uses JSON array elements as facets rather than the arrays. However, if a search is "Apply"ed (using the Apply button), the array itself rather than its elements used.

To reproduce: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=pk&_facet=created&_facet=tags&_facet_array=tags

Press "Apply", which might be done when removing a filter. Notice that the "tags" facet values are now arrays, not array elements. It appears the "&_facet_array=tags" element of the query string is dropped.

 datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/963/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed
276091279 MDU6SXNzdWUyNzYwOTEyNzk= 144 apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search) mhalle 649467 closed 0     3 2017-11-22T14:40:39Z 2018-05-28T21:29:42Z 2018-05-28T21:29:42Z NONE  

Hey there,

Have you considered providing apsw support as an alternative to stock python sqlite3? I use apsw because it keeps up with sqlite3 and is straightforward to bring in extensions like FTS5. FTS really accelerates the kind of searching often done by web clients.

I may be able to help (it shouldn't be much code), but there are a couple of stylistic questions that come up when supporting an optional package. Also, apsw is tricky in that it doesn't have a pypi package (author says limitations in providing options to setup.py).

datasette 107914493 issue     
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/144/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   completed

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
                ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
                ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
                ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
                ON [issues] ([user]);