issues
8 rows where repo = 107914493, type = "issue", "updated_at" is on date 2019-05-29 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, updated_at, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
322477187 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjI0NzcxODc= | 255 | Facets | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 16 | 2018-05-12T03:00:07Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2018-05-16T15:32:12Z | OWNER | Ability to display facets and facet counts on the table view. Facets can be specified in the URL with
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/255/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
334148669 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMzQxNDg2Njk= | 318 | Facets with value of 0 displayed incorrectly | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0.23.1 3439337 | 1 | 2018-06-20T16:06:46Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2018-06-21T04:30:45Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/318/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
346028655 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDYwMjg2NTU= | 356 | Ability to display facet counts for many-to-many relationships | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2018-07-31T04:14:26Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2019-05-25T16:30:09Z | OWNER | Parent: #354 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/356/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
349827640 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDk4Mjc2NDA= | 359 | Faceted browse against a JSON list of tags | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2018-08-12T17:01:14Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2019-05-03T00:21:44Z | OWNER | If a table has a
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/359/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
431800286 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MzE4MDAyODY= | 427 | New design for facet abstraction, including querystring and metadata.json | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2019-04-11T02:24:15Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2019-05-03T00:11:29Z | OWNER | I need a better design for query strings for facets (and for how facets are enabled in Think of all of the potential kinds of facets:
Maybe bundling JSON in querystrings is a way to do options?
Could detect values starting with This could even be the mechanism that allows us to extend regular facets to support additional options like adding a sum or max to each one. Problem: it’s not obvious what the name associated with these facets should be. What if one column is faceted multiple times using multiple facet variants? Maybe just number them? name1=… name2=… etc? Other option is to use Solr style querystring syntax for notation. Solr does this: So how about this:
Related: #359 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
445862501 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDU4NjI1MDE= | 477 | Documentation for ArrayFacet (facet by JSON array) | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0.28 4305096 | 0 | 2019-05-19T20:47:27Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2019-05-19T21:19:43Z | OWNER | This is missing from https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/0.27.1/facets.html right now |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/477/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
446429421 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDY0Mjk0MjE= | 481 | Facet by date | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-05-21T05:55:54Z | 2019-05-29T21:39:12Z | 2019-05-21T06:09:49Z | OWNER | Ability to facet on datetime fields by their date. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/481/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
447408527 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDc0MDg1Mjc= | 483 | Option to facet by date using month or year | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2019-05-23T01:25:29Z | 2019-05-29T21:38:27Z | OWNER | Facet by date (from #481) can take datetimes and facet them by the day component. https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_facet_date=created I'd like to also be able to facet by month or year. I'm not sure what the best way to achieve this is. Could be two more Facet classes (YearFacet and MonthFacet) but I think it might be nicer if the existing DateFacet could take an optional argument that changed its behaviour. But... if I do that, do I expose it in the UI somewhere or is it only available to URL-hackers? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/483/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);