issues
5 rows where repo = 107914493, "updated_at" is on date 2020-12-17 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
443021509 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDMwMjE1MDk= | 461 | Paginate + search for databases/tables on the homepage | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-05-11T18:05:34Z | 2020-12-17T22:14:46Z | OWNER | Split out from #460 - in order to support large numbers of connected databases the homepage needs to be paginated. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
750089847 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTAwODk4NDc= | 1109 | Deprecate --config in Datasette 1.0 (in favour of --setting) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-11-24T21:43:57Z | 2020-12-17T22:07:49Z | OWNER | I added a deprecation warning to this in #992. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1109/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
634663505 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzQ2NjM1MDU= | 815 | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 8 | 2020-06-08T14:25:23Z | 2020-12-17T22:06:48Z | OWNER | Now that we're making a LOT more permission checks (on the DB index page we do a check for every listed table for example) the Can make this more readable by grouping permission checks by request. Have most recent request at the top of the page but the permission requests within that page sorted chronologically by most recent last. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
450032134 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTAwMzIxMzQ= | 495 | facet_m2m gets confused by multiple relationships | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-05-29T21:37:28Z | 2020-12-17T05:08:22Z | OWNER | I got this for a database I was playing with: I think this is because of these three tables: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/495/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
463492815 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjM0OTI4MTU= | 534 | 500 error on m2m facet detection | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-07-03T00:42:42Z | 2020-12-17T05:08:22Z | OWNER | This may help debug:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/534/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);