issues
5 rows where repo = 107914493 and "updated_at" is on date 2022-10-07 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1157182254 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5E-TMu | 1646 | Configuration directory mode does not pick up other file extensions than .db | dnsos 15640196 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-03-02T13:15:23Z | 2022-10-07T23:06:17Z | 2022-10-07T23:03:35Z | NONE | Hello, I've been trying to run Datasette with the configuration directory mode with a structure such as this one:
(In my scenario I can't just change the filename extension without other problems arising) Now databases with the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1646/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1400494162 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c5AW_kl | 1838 | Open Datasette link in new tab | ocdtrekkie 4399499 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-10-07T01:12:20Z | 2022-10-07T16:28:41Z | 2022-10-07T02:01:07Z | NONE | simonw/datasette/pulls/1838 | This is technically a Sandstorm-specific fix (as external links do not work inside the grain frame), however, I think it is an improvement to the upstream project, so I wanted to propose it here rather than patching it in our package. There's much opinions on the Internet about whether external links should open in a new tab by default or not, but I'd argue very few people who might click a "powered by" link intend to complete their interaction with the source page (a Datasette). And furthermore, users may be working within various queries or loading visualizations (navigating away when trying to plot a million GPS coordinates pretty much just resets your progress!), so linking away within the tab might be a frustrating or destructive act to one's work, even inadvertently. original report: https://github.com/ocdtrekkie/datasette-sandstorm/issues/1 :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1838.org.readthedocs.build/en/1838/ |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1838/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
1386456717 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c4_oHI4 | 1820 | [SPIKE] Don't truncate query CSVs | fgregg 536941 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-09-26T17:27:01Z | 2022-10-07T16:12:17Z | 2022-10-07T16:12:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1820 | Relates to #526 This is a minimal set of changes needed for having query CSVs attempt to download all the rows. What's good about it is the minimalism. What's bad about it:
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1820.org.readthedocs.build/en/1820/ |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1820/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | |||||
1015646369 | I_kwDOBm6k_c48iYih | 1480 | Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database | ghing 110420 | open | 0 | 9 | 2021-10-04T21:20:24Z | 2022-10-07T04:39:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | When I try to deploy a 4.8G SQLite database to Google Cloud Run, I get this error message:
Unfortunately, the maximum amount of memory that can be allocated to an instance is 8192M. Naively profiling the memory usage of running Datasette with this database locally on my MacBook shows the following memory usage (using Activity Monitor) when I just start up Datasette locally:
I'm trying to understand if there's a query or other operation that gets run during container deployment that causes memory use to be so large and if this can be avoided somehow. This is somewhat related to #1082, but on a different platform, so I decided to open a new issue. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
860722711 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NjA3MjI3MTE= | 1301 | Publishing to cloudrun with immutable mode? | louispotok 5413548 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-04-18T17:51:46Z | 2022-10-07T02:38:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm a bit confused about immutable mode and publishing to cloudrun. (I want to publish with immutable mode so that I can support database downloads.) Running
However, running When I just |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1301/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);