issues
6 rows where repo = 140912432 and "updated_at" is on date 2023-08-18 sorted by number
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, author_association, created_at (date), closed_at (date)
repo 1
- sqlite-utils · 6 ✖
id | node_id | number ▼ | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1754174496 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5ojpQg | 558 | Ability to define unique columns when creating a table | aguinane 1910303 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-06-13T06:56:19Z | 2023-08-18T01:06:03Z | NONE | When creating a new table, it would be good to have an option to set unique columns similar to how not_null is set. ```python from sqlite_utils import Database columns = {"mRID": str, "name": str} db = Database("example.db") db["ExampleTable"].create(columns, pk="mRID", not_null=["mRID"], if_not_exists=True) db["ExampleTable"].create_index(["mRID"], unique=True, if_not_exists=True) ``` So something like this would add the UNIQUE flag to the table definition.
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/558/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1817289521 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sUaMx | 577 | Get `add_foreign_keys()` to work without modifying `sqlite_master` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 9 | 2023-07-23T20:40:18Z | 2023-08-18T17:43:11Z | 2023-08-18T00:48:10Z | OWNER | This is the only place in the code that attempts to modify Could this use the Or automatically switch to that trick if it hits an error? |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/577/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1855836914 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5undLy | 583 | Get rid of test.utils.collapse_whitespace | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2023-08-17T23:31:09Z | 2023-08-18T00:59:19Z | 2023-08-18T00:59:19Z | OWNER | I have a neater pattern for this now - instead of: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/1dc6b5aa644a92d3654f7068110ed7930989ce71/tests/test_create.py#L472-L475 I now prefer: |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/583/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1855838223 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM5YM-I3 | 584 | .transform() instead of modifying sqlite_master for add_foreign_keys | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 13 | 2023-08-17T23:32:45Z | 2023-08-18T00:48:13Z | 2023-08-18T00:48:08Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/584 | Refs: - #577 :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sqlite-utils--584.org.readthedocs.build/en/584/ |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/584/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
1855894222 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5unrLO | 585 | CLI equivalents to `transform(add_foreign_keys=)` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 7 | 2023-08-18T01:07:15Z | 2023-08-18T01:51:16Z | 2023-08-18T01:51:15Z | OWNER | The new options added in: - #577 Deserve consideration in the CLI as well. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/585/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1856075668 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5uoXeU | 586 | .transform() fails to drop column if table is part of a view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-08-18T05:25:22Z | 2023-08-18T06:13:47Z | OWNER | I got this error trying to drop a column from a table that was part of a SQL view:
Upon further investigation I found that this pattern seemed to fix it:
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-edit-schema/issues/35#issuecomment-1683370548 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/586/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);