issues
4 rows where comments = 15 and repo = 140912432 sorted by repo
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo ▼ | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
521868864 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MjE4Njg4NjQ= | 66 | The ".upsert()" method is misnamed | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 15 | 2019-11-12T23:48:28Z | 2019-12-31T01:30:21Z | 2019-12-31T01:30:20Z | OWNER | This thread here is illuminating: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3634984/insert-if-not-exists-else-update The term It means "behave as an UPDATE or a no-op if the INSERT would violate a uniqueness constraint". The syntax in 3.24.0+ looks like this (confusingly it does not use the term "upsert"):
If the record already exists, it will be entirely replaced by a new record - as opposed to updating any specified fields but leaving existing fields as they are (the behaviour of "upsert" in SQLite itself). |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/66/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
841377702 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NDEzNzc3MDI= | 251 | "sqlite-utils convert" command to replace the separate "sqlite-transform" tool | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 15 | 2021-03-25T22:36:36Z | 2021-08-02T22:39:46Z | 2021-08-02T04:47:40Z | OWNER | See https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-transform/issues/11 - I built a separate |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/251/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1094890366 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM4wlm3B | 361 | --lines and --text and --convert and --import | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 15 | 2022-01-06T01:49:44Z | 2022-01-06T06:37:03Z | 2022-01-06T06:24:54Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/361 | Refs #356 Still TODO:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/361/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
1572766460 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5dvoL8 | 524 | Transformation type `--type DATETIME` | 4l1fe 21095447 | closed | 0 | 15 | 2023-02-06T15:18:42Z | 2023-02-15T12:10:54Z | 2023-02-15T12:10:54Z | NONE | Hey. Currently i do transformation with the type Is it possible to alter a column type to |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/524/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);
comments 1 ✖