issues
11 rows where author_association = "NONE" and repo = 207052882 sorted by closed_at
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at ▼ | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
664485022 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NjQ0ODUwMjI= | 46 | Feature: pull request reviews and comments | bhrutledge 1326704 | open | 0 | 6 | 2020-07-23T13:43:45Z | 2022-12-20T14:40:15Z | NONE | Hi there! I saw your presentation at Boston Python. I'm already a light user of Datasette (thank you!), but wasn't aware of this project. I've been working on a "pull request dashboard" to get a comprehensive view of the state of open PR's, esp. related to reviews (i.e., pending, approved, changes requested). Currently it's a CLI command, but I thought a Datasette UI might be fun. I see that PR's are available from the |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/46/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
920636216 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MjA2MzYyMTY= | 64 | feature: support "events" | khimaros 231498 | open | 0 | 5 | 2021-06-14T17:42:49Z | 2021-06-15T00:48:37Z | NONE | the GitHub API provides the ability to fetch all events for a given user, organization, or repository: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/activity#list-events-for-the-authenticated-user this would allow users to export all of the issue comments, new issues, etc. that they created. something which is currently missing from the GitHub takeout exports. |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/64/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1211283427 | I_kwDODFdgUs5IMrfj | 72 | feature: display progress bar when downloading multi-page responses | hydrosquall 9020979 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-04-21T16:37:12Z | 2022-04-21T17:29:31Z | NONE | MotivationFor a long running command (longer than 1 minute) for a big table (like pull requests or commits), it can be tricky to know if the script is still running, or if a rate limit/error was encountered We know how many pages there are, so it may be possible to indicate how many remain. Resources
|
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/72/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1363244199 | I_kwDODFdgUs5RQXSn | 75 | Fetch repos doesn't support organisations | OverkillGuy 2757699 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-06T12:55:06Z | 2022-09-06T12:55:06Z | NONE | Say I want to get all my Github Org's repos info, for data analysis. Not just the public repos, but also the private/internal repos. The endpoints are different for organisation, and this tool doesn't take it into account: https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/ace13ec3d98090d99bd71871c286a4a612c96a50/github_to_sqlite/utils.py#L453 https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/ace13ec3d98090d99bd71871c286a4a612c96a50/github_to_sqlite/utils.py#L455 The endpoints for organisation repos is instead (source):
Let's add support for organisations repo scraping. |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/75/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1505411725 | I_kwDODFdgUs5ZusKN | 78 | self-hosted or corp github enterprise | ebdavison 549431 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-12-20T22:51:45Z | 2022-12-20T22:51:45Z | NONE | We use github enterprise at work and I would like to use this tool to pull info from that site rather than the public github.com instance. Is there an option for this? If not, can one be added for a custom repo URL? |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/78/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
504238461 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MDQyMzg0NjE= | 6 | sqlite3.OperationalError: table users has no column named bio | dazzag24 1055831 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-10-08T19:39:52Z | 2019-10-13T05:31:28Z | 2019-10-13T05:30:19Z | NONE | ``` $ github-to-sqlite repos github.db $ github-to-sqlite starred github.db dazzag24 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/bin/github-to-sqlite", line 10, in <module> sys.exit(cli()) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 764, in call return self.main(args, kwargs) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 717, in main rv = self.invoke(ctx) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1137, in invoke return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx)) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 956, in invoke return ctx.invoke(self.callback, ctx.params) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 555, in invoke return callback(args, **kwargs) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/github_to_sqlite/cli.py", line 106, in starred utils.save_stars(db, user, stars) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/github_to_sqlite/utils.py", line 177, in save_stars user_id = save_user(db, user) File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/github_to_sqlite/utils.py", line 61, in save_user return db["users"].upsert(to_save, pk="id").last_pk File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py", line 1067, in upsert extracts=extracts, File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py", line 916, in insert extracts=extracts, File "/home/darreng/.virtualenvs/dogsheep-d2PjdrD7/lib/python3.6/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py", line 1024, in insert_all result = self.db.conn.execute(sql, values) sqlite3.OperationalError: table users has no column named bio ``` ``` $ pipenv graph github-to-sqlite==0.4 - requests [required: Any, installed: 2.22.0] - certifi [required: >=2017.4.17, installed: 2019.9.11] - chardet [required: >=3.0.2,<3.1.0, installed: 3.0.4] - idna [required: >=2.5,<2.9, installed: 2.8] - urllib3 [required: >=1.21.1,<1.26,!=1.25.1,!=1.25.0, installed: 1.25.6] - sqlite-utils [required: ~=1.11, installed: 1.11] - click [required: Any, installed: 7.0] - click-default-group [required: Any, installed: 1.2.2] - click [required: Any, installed: 7.0] - tabulate [required: Any, installed: 0.8.5] Python 3.6.8 ``` |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/6/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
544571092 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDQ1NzEwOTI= | 15 | Assets table with downloads | garethr 2029 | closed | 0 | 1.0 5225818 | 4 | 2020-01-02T13:05:28Z | 2020-03-28T12:17:01Z | 2020-03-23T19:17:32Z | NONE | The |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/15/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
546051181 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDYwNTExODE= | 16 | Exception running first command: IndexError: list index out of range | jayvdb 15092 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2020-01-07T03:01:58Z | 2020-04-14T18:37:21Z | 2020-04-14T18:37:21Z | NONE | Exception running first command without an existing db or auth. ```py
|
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/16/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
609950090 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MDk5NTAwOTA= | 33 | Fall back to authentication via ENV | garethr 2029 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2020-04-30T12:58:14Z | 2020-05-02T18:46:10Z | 2020-05-02T18:45:37Z | NONE | Would you accept a PR that falls back to looking for an environment variable for the GitHub token? Specifically a change here: https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/c34d5a18bfc41fa08755ba3d5cf9fe09ff204238/github_to_sqlite/cli.py#L271 I'd like to use Wanted to check first, I'm happy to submit a PR with tests and updates to the docs. |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/33/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
611284481 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyODQ0ODE= | 38 | [Feature Request] Support Repo Name in Search 🥺 | zzeleznick 5779832 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2020-05-02T22:08:51Z | 2020-05-03T02:34:32Z | 2020-05-02T23:15:11Z | NONE | DescriptionPer your v2.2 release tweet I played with the demo, but the output did not match my expectations. Expected BehaviorExpected a search query for "twitter" contained within the Actual Behavior😭 0 rows where repo contains "twitter" sorted by starred_at descending Best ExplanationPer the table schema (see appendix) Desired BehaviorGiven that searching for "206156866" is less intuitive than "twitter", it would be great to support this via extending the search capabilities or by adding an additional column. ✅ 104 rows where repo contains "twitter" ❌ 104 rows where repo contains "206156866" sorted by starred_at descending Appendix
|
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/38/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1177059481 | I_kwDODFdgUs5GKICZ | 71 | Store commit parents | carltongibson 64686 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2022-03-22T17:06:48Z | 2022-04-22T12:44:04Z | 2022-04-22T12:44:04Z | NONE | Hi @simonw 👋 Currently, stored commit data doesn't quite give me the information I'm needing... Committer date and author date are not 100% reliable for dividing a commit history up by release or branch. A PR created before a release but merged after can have earlier dates… — this can be quite frustrating if you're trying to pin down commits for a release: It should be there!, but then isn't. (This gets worse using release branches.) Would you be open to adding the It's part of the response body:
I think this list should only have a single entry. (🤔 — not sure why it's a list then...) With this it would be possible to build/reconstruct a chain of commits from the history, that I don't think is available as yet (unless you know a better way). It is certainly possible to get sequential lists of commits out of git directly, so the same would be possible combining tools, but wondering if a single tool could do it. What do you think? Thanks! 🏅 |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/71/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);