issues
4 rows where state = "closed" and "updated_at" is on date 2020-11-06 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, updated_at, closed_at, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
577302229 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzczMDIyMjk= | 91 | Enable ordering FTS results by rank | gfrmin 416374 | closed | 0 | 3.0 6079500 | 1 | 2020-03-07T08:43:51Z | 2020-11-06T23:53:26Z | 2020-11-06T23:53:25Z | NONE | According to https://www.sqlite.org/fts5.html (not sure about FTS4) results can be sorted by relevance. At the moment results are returned by default by |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/91/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
735663855 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTE1MDE0ODgz | 195 | table.search() improvements plus sqlite-utils search command | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2020-11-03T22:02:08Z | 2020-11-06T18:30:49Z | 2020-11-06T18:30:42Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/195 | Refs #192. Still needs tests. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/195/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
737476423 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Mzc0NzY0MjM= | 198 | Support order by relevance against FTS4 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2020-11-06T05:36:31Z | 2020-11-06T18:30:44Z | 2020-11-06T18:30:44Z | OWNER | For #192 and #197 I've decided I want to be able to order by relevance in FTS4 as well as FTS5. This means I need to port over my work on bm25() from https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-fts4 (since I don't want to add a full dependency). |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/198/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
737855731 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Mzc4NTU3MzE= | 199 | @db.register_function(..., replace=False) to avoid double-registering custom functions | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2020-11-06T15:39:21Z | 2020-11-06T18:30:44Z | 2020-11-06T18:30:44Z | OWNER | I'd like a mechanism to optionally avoid registering a custom function if it has already been registered. SQLite doesn't seem to offer a way to introspect registered custom functions so I'll need to track what has already been registered in
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/198#issuecomment-723145383 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/199/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);