issues
7 rows where type = "issue" and "updated_at" is on date 2022-02-02 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1122450452 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5zwU | 1625 | Try running tests against macOS and Windows in addition to Ubuntu | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-02T22:25:57Z | 2022-02-02T22:25:57Z | OWNER | I already do this for Related: - #1617 - #1545 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1625/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1121618041 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C2oh5 | 1620 | Link: rel="alternate" to JSON for queries too | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2022-02-02T08:02:42Z | 2022-02-02T21:53:02Z | 2022-02-02T21:33:00Z | OWNER | Following: - #1533 I implemented it for tables and rows but I should have done queries as well. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1620/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1121121305 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C0vQZ | 1618 | Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" | strada 770231 | open | 0 | 6 | 2022-02-01T19:39:46Z | 2022-02-02T19:42:03Z | NONE | First of all, thanks for creating this cool project, and also supporting publishing to various hosting services out of the box. While testing out, I noticed legitimate queries such as
Example as seen from a Datasette instance: https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/polls?sql=select+*+from+books+where+title+like+%27Pragmatic%25%27%0D%0A I'd propose a regular expression like
I can create a pull request with this change, unless the maintainers think it would allow unwanted queries to be executed. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1065431383 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gTFX | 1533 | Add `Link: rel="alternate"` header pointing to JSON for a table/query | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2021-11-28T20:43:25Z | 2022-02-02T07:56:51Z | 2022-02-02T07:49:33Z | OWNER | Originally explored in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-notebook/issues/2#issuecomment-980789406 - I wanted an efficient way to scan a list of URLs and figure out which if any of those corresponded to Datasette tables, canned queries or SQL output that could be represented as a table on a page. It looks like a neat way to do that is with
I can put a |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1533/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1117132741 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ClhfF | 1615 | Potential simplified publishing mechanism | aidansteele 369053 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-01-28T08:34:50Z | 2022-02-02T07:34:21Z | 2022-02-02T07:34:17Z | NONE | Hi, Forewarning: this idea is one I've only been thinking about for a while and it's not fully fleshed-out yet. I love Datasette and what it stands for. I was thinking about how we could make it accessible to more people, especially those without access to credit cards required for a lot of hosting options. Or they might not feel comfortable signing up for said services. So I was thinking I might create a service that hosts Datasette instances for folks. I'd probably stick it on AWS Lambda and limit requests to something like n/month to avoid bankrupting myself. If I did build such a hypothetical service, I was thinking I would rely on GitHub Actions to do the heavy lifting. E.g. user ```yaml .github/workflows/push.ymlon: push this allows the publish action to use OIDC to authenticate johndoe/my-animalspermissions: id-token: write contents: read jobs: publish: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/setup-python@v2
``` This would then cause a Datasette instance to be available at What do you think? Does this address a real need? Or am I perhaps misunderstanding the main friction points? As a bonus: it feels like this would pair well with git scraping. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1615/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1096536240 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5BW9Cw | 1586 | run analyze on all databases as part of start up or publishing | fgregg 536941 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-01-07T17:52:34Z | 2022-02-02T07:13:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Running It might be nice if the analyze was run as part of the start up of "serve" or "publish". |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1586/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1113384383 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CXOW_ | 1611 | Avoid ever running count(*) against SpatiaLite KNN table | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-01-25T03:32:54Z | 2022-02-02T06:45:47Z | OWNER | Got this in a trace: Looks like running |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1611/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);