issues
5 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2020-05-03 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, comments, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
610408908 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTA0MDg5MDg= | 34 | Command for retrieving dependents for a repo | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2020-04-30T21:47:51Z | 2020-05-03T15:53:01Z | 2020-05-03T15:53:01Z | MEMBER | I really, really want to start grabbing this data: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/network/dependents |
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/34/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
611222968 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyMjI5Njg= | 107 | sqlite-utils create-view CLI command | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2020-05-02T16:15:13Z | 2020-05-03T15:36:58Z | 2020-05-03T15:36:37Z | OWNER | Can go with #27 - |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/107/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
455496504 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTU0OTY1MDQ= | 27 | sqlite-utils create-table command | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 8 | 2019-06-13T01:43:30Z | 2020-05-03T15:26:15Z | 2020-05-03T15:26:15Z | OWNER | Spun off from #24 - it would be useful if CLI users could create new tables (with explicit column types, not null rules and defaults) without having to insert an example record.
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/27/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
611326701 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEzMjY3MDE= | 108 | Documentation unit tests for CLI commands | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2020-05-03T03:58:42Z | 2020-05-03T04:13:57Z | 2020-05-03T04:13:57Z | OWNER | Have a test that ensures all CLI commands are documented. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/108/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
611284481 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyODQ0ODE= | 38 | [Feature Request] Support Repo Name in Search 🥺 | zzeleznick 5779832 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2020-05-02T22:08:51Z | 2020-05-03T02:34:32Z | 2020-05-02T23:15:11Z | NONE | DescriptionPer your v2.2 release tweet I played with the demo, but the output did not match my expectations. Expected BehaviorExpected a search query for "twitter" contained within the Actual Behavior😭 0 rows where repo contains "twitter" sorted by starred_at descending Best ExplanationPer the table schema (see appendix) Desired BehaviorGiven that searching for "206156866" is less intuitive than "twitter", it would be great to support this via extending the search capabilities or by adding an additional column. ✅ 104 rows where repo contains "twitter" ❌ 104 rows where repo contains "206156866" sorted by starred_at descending Appendix
|
github-to-sqlite 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/38/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);