issues
3 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2023-05-08 and user = 167893 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1575131737 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5d4ppZ | 525 | Repeated calls to `Table.convert()` fail | mcarpenter 167893 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2023-02-07T22:40:47Z | 2023-05-08T21:59:41Z | 2023-05-08T21:54:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | SummaryWhen using the API, repeated calls to Example```python from sqlite_utils import Database db = Database(memory=True) table = db['table'] col = 'x' table.insert_all([{col: 1}]) print(table.get(1)) table.convert(col, lambda x: x*2) print(table.get(1)) def zeroize(x): return 0 zeroize = lambda x: 0zeroize.name = 'zeroize'table.convert(col, zeroize) print(table.get(1)) ``` Output:
ExplanationThis is some relevant documentation.
There's a mismatch between the comments and the code: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/fc221f9b62ed8624b1d2098e564f525c84497969/sqlite_utils/db.py#L404 but actually the existing function is returned/used instead (as the "registering custom sql functions" doc I linked above says too). Seems like this can be rectified to match the comment? Suggested fixI think there are four things:
1. The call to See also
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/525/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1576990618 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM5JkkED | 526 | Fix repeated calls to `Table.convert()` | mcarpenter 167893 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-02-09T00:14:49Z | 2023-05-08T21:56:05Z | 2023-05-08T21:53:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/526 | Fixes #525. All tests pass. There's perhaps a better way to name lambdas? There could be a collision if a caller passes a function with name like SQLite documentation is a little, ah, lite on function name specs. If there is a character that can be used in place of underscore in a SQLite function name that is not permitted in a Python function identifier then that could be a good way to prevent accidental collisions. (I tried dash, colon, dot, no joy). Otherwise, there is little chance of this happening and if it should happen the risk is mitigated by now throwing an exception in the case of a (name, arity) collision without :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sqlite-utils--526.org.readthedocs.build/en/526/ |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/526/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
1578793661 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM5Jqn1u | 528 | Enable `Table.convert()` on falsey values | mcarpenter 167893 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2023-02-10T00:04:09Z | 2023-05-08T21:08:23Z | 2023-05-08T21:08:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/528 | Fixes #527 :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sqlite-utils--528.org.readthedocs.build/en/528/ |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/528/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);