issues
3 rows where user = 1176293 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1930008379 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5zCZc7 | 2197 | click-default-group-wheel dependency conflict | ar-jan 1176293 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2023-10-06T11:49:20Z | 2023-10-12T21:53:17Z | 2023-10-12T21:53:17Z | NONE | I upgraded my dependencies, then ran into this problem running
Turns out the released version of datasette still depends on
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2197/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1434911255 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5VhwIX | 510 | Cannot enable FTS5 despite it being available | ar-jan 1176293 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-11-03T16:03:49Z | 2022-11-18T18:37:52Z | 2022-11-17T10:36:28Z | NONE | When I do FTS5 is however available and Python/SQLite versions do not seem to be the issue. I can manually create the FTS5 virtual table, and then Datasette also works with it from this same Python environment.
Any ideas what's happening and how to fix? |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/510/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1266207143 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5LeMmn | 1755 | Gunicorn | ar-jan 1176293 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-06-09T14:18:46Z | 2022-06-09T14:18:46Z | NONE | I've read issue #514 which resulted in running Datasette via systemd as recommended approach. We've also adopted this (for now), but I notice that Uvicorn says the following:
We usually deploy Python applications via Gunicorn for these process management features (e.g. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1755/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);