issues
2 rows where user = 16001974 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 831751367 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MzE3NTEzNjc= | 246 | Escaping FTS search strings | DeNeutoy 16001974 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2021-03-15T12:15:09Z | 2021-08-18T18:57:13Z | 2021-08-18T18:43:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the excellent library, it's very nice to use! I've been building some in memory search functionality for a data annotation tool i'm making, and I got tripped up a little bit with escaping the full text search queries. First I tried using http://search-24ways.herokuapp.com/24ways-f8f455f/articles?_search=acces%2A I got around this by aggressively escaping quotes inside the query string like this: ```python quoted = q.replace('"', '""') quoted = f'"{quoted}"' print(quoted) results = db["data"].search(quoted, columns=["id"]) return [x["id"] for x in results] ``` This works in the sense it doesn't crash, but it also removes access to the search query syntax. Given the well specified definition, it might be possible for sqlite-utils to provide a |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | {
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/246/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
completed | ||||||
| 832687563 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTkzODA1ODA0 | 247 | FTS quote functionality from datasette | DeNeutoy 16001974 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2021-03-16T11:17:34Z | 2021-08-18T18:43:12Z | 2021-08-18T18:43:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/247 | Addresses #246 - this is a bit of a kludge because it doesn't actually validate the FTS string, just makes sure that it will not crash when executed, but I figured that building a query parser is a bit out of the scope of sqlite-utils and if you actually want to use the query language, you probably need to parse that yourself. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | {
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/247/reactions",
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] (
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[number] INTEGER,
[title] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[state] TEXT,
[locked] INTEGER,
[assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
[comments] INTEGER,
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[closed_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[pull_request] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
[type] TEXT
, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
ON [issues] ([user]);