issues
408 rows where repo = 140912432 and user = 9599 sorted by closed_at
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: milestone, comments, draft, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at ▼ | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
455486286 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTU0ODYyODY= | 26 | Mechanism for turning nested JSON into foreign keys / many-to-many | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2019-06-13T00:52:06Z | 2022-06-29T23:35:29Z | OWNER | The GitHub JSON APIs have a really interesting convention with respect to related objects. Consider https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues - here's a truncated subset:
Since both user and label have populated It would be really neat if Thanks to |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/26/reactions", "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
472115381 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzIxMTUzODE= | 49 | extracts= should support multiple-column extracts | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 10 | 2019-07-24T07:06:41Z | 2020-10-16T19:18:19Z | OWNER | Lookup tables can be constructed on compound columns, but the Right now extracts can be defined in two ways: ```python Extract these columns into tables with the same name:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts=["breed", "most_recent_trophy"]) Same as above but with custom table names:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts={"breed": "Breeds", "most_recent_trophy": "Trophies"}) ``` Need some kind of syntax for much more complicated extractions, like when two columns (say "source" and "source_version") are extracted into a single table. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
573578548 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzM1Nzg1NDg= | 89 | Ability to customize columns used by extracts= feature | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-03-01T16:54:48Z | 2020-10-16T19:17:50Z | OWNER | @simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, Initial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:
I haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing? Originally posted by @chrishas35 in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/89/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
581795570 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODE3OTU1NzA= | 93 | Support more string values for types in .add_column() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-03-15T19:32:49Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/2.4.2/python-api.html#adding-columns says:
As discovered in #92 this isn't the right list of values. I should expand this to match https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/93/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
644161221 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDQxNjEyMjE= | 117 | Support for compound (composite) foreign keys | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-06-23T21:33:42Z | 2020-06-23T21:40:31Z | OWNER | It turns out SQLite supports composite foreign keys: https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_composite Their example looks like this: ```sql CREATE TABLE album( albumartist TEXT, albumname TEXT, albumcover BINARY, PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname) ); CREATE TABLE song( songid INTEGER, songartist TEXT, songalbum TEXT, songname TEXT, FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname) ); ``` Here's what that looks like in sqlite-utils: ``` In [1]: import sqlite_utils In [2]: import sqlite3 In [3]: conn = sqlite3.connect(":memory:") In [4]: conn In [5]: conn.executescript("""
...: CREATE TABLE album(
...: albumartist TEXT,
...: albumname TEXT,
...: albumcover BINARY,
...: PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname)
...: );
...: In [6]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn) In [7]: db.tables |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
652961907 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NTI5NjE5MDc= | 121 | Improved (and better documented) support for transactions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-07-08T04:56:51Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/118#issuecomment-655283393 We should put some thought into how this library supports and encourages smart use of transactions. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/121/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
675753042 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NzU3NTMwNDI= | 131 | sqlite-utils insert: options for column types | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2020-08-09T18:59:11Z | 2022-03-15T13:21:42Z | OWNER | The It would be useful if you could do the following:
For specific columns maybe this:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/131/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
688351054 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTEwNTQ= | 140 | Idea: insert-files mechanism for adding extra columns with fixed values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-08-28T20:57:36Z | 2022-03-20T19:45:45Z | OWNER | Say for example you want to populate a
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/140/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
688352145 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTIxNDU= | 141 | insert-files support for compressed values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-08-28T20:59:46Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:08Z | OWNER | The |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/141/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
695441530 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU0NDE1MzA= | 154 | OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-09-07T23:42:44Z | 2020-09-07T23:47:10Z | OWNER | I'm getting this error when running:
I'm worried that maybe that's because of this new code from #152: |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/154/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
706001517 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MDYwMDE1MTc= | 163 | Idea: conversions= could take Python functions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2020-09-22T00:37:12Z | 2021-12-20T00:56:52Z | OWNER | Right now you use
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/163/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
722816436 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjI4MTY0MzY= | 186 | .extract() shouldn't extract null values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-10-16T02:41:08Z | 2021-08-12T12:32:14Z | OWNER | This almost works, but it creates a rogue |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/186/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
816526538 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTY1MjY1Mzg= | 239 | sqlite-utils extract could handle nested objects | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 16 | 2021-02-25T15:10:28Z | 2022-09-03T23:46:02Z | OWNER | Imagine a table (imported from a nested JSON file) where one of the columns contains values that look like this:
The |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/239/reactions", "total_count": 6, "+1": 5, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
816601354 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTgwMjM1NDI3 | 241 | Extract expand - work in progress | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/241 | Refs #239. Still needs documentation and CLI implementation. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/241/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
944846776 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NDQ4NDY3NzY= | 297 | Option for importing CSV data using the SQLite .import mechanism | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 23 | 2021-07-14T22:36:41Z | 2023-09-22T20:49:52Z | OWNER | As seen in https://til.simonwillison.net/sqlite/import-csv - An option to use this would be useful - maybe something like this:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/297/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
961008507 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjEwMDg1MDc= | 308 | Add an interactive tutorial as a Jupyter notebook | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-04T20:34:22Z | 2021-08-04T21:30:59Z | OWNER | Can show people how to open this up in Binder. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/308/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
974067156 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NzQwNjcxNTY= | 318 | Research: handle gzipped CSV directly | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-18T21:23:04Z | 2021-08-18T21:25:30Z | OWNER | Would it be worthwhile for the Maybe add |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/318/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1066563554 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_knfi | 346 | Way to test SQLite 3.37 (and potentially other versions) in CI | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2021-11-29T22:21:06Z | 2021-11-29T23:12:49Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/344#issuecomment-982076924 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/346/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1066603133 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM4vKAzW | 347 | Test against pysqlite3 running SQLite 3.37 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 9 | 2021-11-29T23:17:57Z | 2021-12-11T01:02:19Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/347 | Refs #346 and #344. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/347/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
1071531082 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_3kRK | 349 | A way of creating indexes on newly created tables | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-12-05T18:56:12Z | 2021-12-07T01:04:37Z | OWNER | I'm writing code for https://github.com/simonw/git-history/issues/33 that creates a table inside a loop:
But there's no mechanism in SQLite utils to detect if the table was created for the first time and add an index to it. And I don't want to run This should work like the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/349/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1072435124 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_7A-0 | 350 | Optional caching mechanism for table.lookup() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-12-06T17:54:25Z | 2021-12-06T17:56:57Z | OWNER | Inspired by work on
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1072792507 | I_kwDOCGYnMM4_8YO7 | 352 | `sqlite-utils insert --extract colname` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2021-12-07T00:55:44Z | 2022-02-03T22:59:36Z | OWNER | Is there a reason I've not added |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/352/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1090798237 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5BBEKd | 359 | Use RETURNING if available to populate last_pk | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-12-29T23:43:23Z | 2021-12-29T23:43:23Z | OWNER | Inspired by this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29729283
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/359/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1122446693 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5C5y1l | 394 | Test against Python 3.11-dev | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-02-02T22:21:03Z | 2022-02-03T21:06:35Z | OWNER | sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/394/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
1124731464 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5DCgpI | 399 | Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 25 | 2022-02-05T00:11:26Z | 2023-05-16T03:11:52Z | OWNER | In playing with the new SpatiaLite helpers from #385 I noticed that actually populating geometry columns is still a little bit tricky. Here's what I ended up doing: ```python import httpx, sqlite_utils db = sqlite_utils.Database("/tmp/spatial.db") attractions = httpx.get("https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attractions.json?_shape=array").json() db["attractions"].insert_all(attractions, pk="pk") Schema of that table is now:CREATE TABLE [attractions] ([pk] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,[name] TEXT,[address] TEXT,[latitude] FLOAT,[longitude] FLOAT)db.init_spatialite() db["attractions"].add_geometry_column("point", "POINT") db.execute("""
update attractions set point = GeomFromText(
'POINT(' || longitude || ' ' || latitude || ')', 4326
)
""")
It would be good to both document this in more detail, but ideally also to come up with a more obvious pattern for inserting common types of spatial data. Also related: - #398 - #79 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1125297737 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5DEq5J | 402 | Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2022-02-06T19:47:41Z | 2022-02-16T10:18:55Z | OWNER | The
New proposed mechanism: ```python from sqlite_utils.utils import LongitudeLatitude db["places"].insert(
{
"name": "London",
"point": (-0.118092, 51.509865)
},
conversions={"point": LongitudeLatitude},
)
This would involve a change to the Best of all... this resolves the Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030739566 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1149661489 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5EhnEx | 409 | `with db:` for transactions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2022-02-24T19:22:06Z | 2022-10-01T03:42:50Z | OWNER | This can be a documented wrapper around |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/409/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1160182768 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5FJvvw | 412 | Optional Pandas integration | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 13 | 2022-03-05T01:49:27Z | 2022-06-14T15:36:29Z | OWNER | It would be neat if there was a way to use this more seamlessly with Pandas, in particular Pandas dataframes - but without making Pandas a required dependency. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/412/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1181236173 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5GaDvN | 422 | Reconsider not running convert functions against null values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-03-25T20:22:40Z | 2022-03-25T20:23:21Z | OWNER | I just got caught out by the fact that I had run this code while working on #420 and I wasn't sure why it didn't work: ``` $ sqlite-utils add-column content.db articles score float $ sqlite-utils convert content.db articles score ' import random random.seed(10) def convert(value):
global random
return random.random()
'
I fixed it by doing this instead:
But this indicates to me that the design of |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/422/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1215216249 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5Ibrp5 | 428 | Research adding support for savepoints | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-04-26T01:04:01Z | 2022-04-26T01:05:29Z | OWNER | https://www.sqlite.org/lang_savepoint.html Savepoints are like regular transactions except they have names and can be nested. Would there be any value in adding support to them to |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/428/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1271426387 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5LyG1T | 444 | CSV `extras_key=` and `ignore_extras=` equivalents for CLI tool | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2022-06-14T22:22:47Z | 2022-07-07T16:39:18Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/440#issuecomment-1155767915 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/444/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1326349129 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5PDntJ | 461 | Consider including animated SVG console demos | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-08-02T20:10:04Z | 2022-08-02T20:12:14Z | OWNER | I recorded this one using https://github.com/nbedos/termtosvg - with
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/461/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1353481513 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5QrH0p | 478 | `sqlite-utils tables data.db table1 table2` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-08-28T22:05:53Z | 2022-08-28T22:22:35Z | OWNER | The If you have a huge table in there then running it with Would be useful if it could accept an optional list of tables that it should execute against, as an alternative to the default of all of them. This should be a backwards compatible change. Current design is: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli-reference.html#tables ``` Usage: sqlite-utils tables [OPTIONS] PATH List the tables in the database Example:
``` |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/478/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1359604075 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5RCelr | 481 | Idea: `sqlite-utils create-table tablename --sql "select ..."` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-02T01:41:24Z | 2022-09-02T01:42:08Z | OWNER | Could offer syntactic sugar for:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/481/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1363766973 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5RSW69 | 484 | Expose convert recipes to `sqlite-utils --functions` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 11 | 2022-09-06T20:15:08Z | 2022-09-07T19:09:52Z | OWNER |
It would be useful if the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/484/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1373224657 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5R2b7R | 488 | `sqlite-utils transform` should set empty strings to null when converting text columns to integer/float | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2022-09-14T15:51:30Z | 2022-12-23T17:38:55Z | OWNER |
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/488/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1374939463 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5R8-lH | 489 | Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 9 | 2022-09-15T18:46:03Z | 2022-09-15T20:56:10Z | OWNER | It's very common for JSON to look like this:
Right now you can't import this into But since this is so common, it would be neat if |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1386530156 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5SpMVs | 492 | Idea: ability to pass extra variables to `--convert` scripts | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2022-09-26T18:30:45Z | 2022-09-26T18:33:19Z | OWNER | Got this idea from this example in https://jeqo.github.io/notes/2022-09-24-ingest-logs-sqlite/
This made me think: it might be neat if you could inject additional variable values into that script with extra command-line options, to make this kind of reuse easier. Something like this:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/492/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1386562662 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5SpURm | 493 | Tiny typographical error in install/uninstall docs | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2022-09-26T19:00:42Z | 2022-10-25T21:31:15Z | OWNER | Added in: - #483 I don't know how to fix this in Sphinx: I'm getting this: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/cli.html#cli-install
But I want it to display Here's the code: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/85247038f70d7eb2f3e272cfeaa4c44459cafba8/docs/cli.rst#L2125 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/493/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1479914599 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5YNbRn | 516 | Feature request: output number of ignored/replaced rows for insert command | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2022-12-06T18:59:21Z | 2022-12-06T19:08:14Z | OWNER | https://hachyderm.io/@briandorsey/109468185742876820
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1700840265 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5lYMNJ | 541 | Get tests to pass with `pytest -Werror` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2023-05-08T19:57:23Z | 2023-05-08T19:59:35Z | OWNER | Inspired by: - #534 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/541/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1700936245 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5lYjo1 | 542 | Remove `skip_false=True` and `--no-skip-false` in `sqlite-utils` 4.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4.0 backwards incomatible changes 9374594 | 1 | 2023-05-08T21:04:28Z | 2023-05-08T21:07:41Z | OWNER | Following: - #527 The only reason I didn't remove fix this mis-feature entirely is that it represents a backwards incompatible change. I'll make that change in 4.0. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/542/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1784794489 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5qYc15 | 562 | Explore the intersection between sqlite-utils and dataclasses | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2023-07-02T19:23:08Z | 2023-07-02T19:26:39Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/llm/issues/65#issuecomment-1616742529 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/562/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1818838294 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5saUUW | 578 | Plugin hook for adding new output formats | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2023-07-24T17:29:18Z | 2023-08-07T15:41:49Z | OWNER |
https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/997738192360964156/1133076679011602432 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/578/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1856075668 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5uoXeU | 586 | .transform() fails to drop column if table is part of a view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-08-18T05:25:22Z | 2023-08-18T06:13:47Z | OWNER | I got this error trying to drop a column from a table that was part of a SQL view:
Upon further investigation I found that this pattern seemed to fix it:
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-edit-schema/issues/35#issuecomment-1683370548 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/586/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1868713944 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5vYk_Y | 588 | `table.get(column=value)` option for retrieving things not by their primary key | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2023-08-28T00:41:23Z | 2023-08-28T00:41:54Z | OWNER | This came up working on this feature: - https://github.com/simonw/llm/pull/186 I have a table with this schema:
Problem is, fetching the collection by name is actually pretty inconvenient. Fetch by numeric ID:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/588/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1879209560 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5wAnZY | 589 | Mechanism for de-registering registered SQL functions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-09-03T19:32:39Z | 2023-09-03T19:36:34Z | OWNER | I used a custom SQL function in a migration script and then realized that it should be de-registered before the end of the script to avoid leaking into the calling code. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1879214365 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5wAokd | 590 | Ability to tell if a Database is an in-memory one | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2023-09-03T19:50:15Z | 2023-09-03T19:50:36Z | OWNER | Currently the constructor accepts This makes it hard to tell if a database object is to an in-memory or a file-based database, which is sometimes useful to know. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/590/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1891614971 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5wv8D7 | 594 | Represent compound foreign keys in table.foreign_keys output | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2023-09-12T03:48:24Z | 2023-09-12T03:51:13Z | OWNER | Given this schema:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/594/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1977155641 | I_kwDOCGYnMM512QA5 | 601 | Move plugin directory into documentation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-11-04T04:07:52Z | 2023-11-04T04:07:52Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils-plugins should be in the official documentation. I can use the same pattern as https://llm.datasette.io/en/stable/plugins/directory.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/601/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
347058326 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjA1NzcwOTk2 | 1 | Make .indexes compatible with older SQLite versions | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2018-08-02T15:17:05Z | 2018-08-02T15:17:30Z | 2018-08-02T15:17:30Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/1 | Older SQLite versions return a different set of columns from the PRAGMA we are using. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/1/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
403028630 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjQ3NTc2OTQy | 4 | Fts5 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-01-25T06:54:05Z | 2019-01-25T06:54:33Z | 2019-01-25T06:54:33Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/4 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/4/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
403396009 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjQ3ODYxNDE5 | 5 | Run Travis tests against Python 3.8-dev | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-01-26T02:30:55Z | 2019-01-26T02:37:54Z | 2019-01-26T02:37:54Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/5 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/5/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
403624090 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MDM2MjQwOTA= | 6 | "sqlite-utils insert" should support newline-delimited JSON | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-01-28T02:00:02Z | 2019-01-28T02:17:45Z | 2019-01-28T02:17:45Z | OWNER | We can already export newline delimited JSON. We should learn to import it as well. The neat thing about importing it is that you can import GBs of data without having to read the whole lot into memory in order to decode the wrapping JSON array. Datasette can export it now: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/405 Demo: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable.json?_shape=array&_nl=on It should be possible to do this:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/6/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
403625674 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MDM2MjU2NzQ= | 7 | .insert_all() should accept a generator and process it efficiently | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-01-28T02:11:58Z | 2019-01-28T06:26:53Z | 2019-01-28T06:26:53Z | OWNER | Right now you have to load every record into memory before passing the list to If you want to process millions of rows, this is inefficient. Python has generators - we should use them! The only catch here is that part of the magic of If a record outside of those first 1,000 has a rogue column, we can crash with an error. This will free us up to make the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/7/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413740684 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM3NDA2ODQ= | 11 | Detect numpy types when creating tables | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-02-23T21:09:35Z | 2019-02-24T04:02:20Z | 2019-02-24T04:02:20Z | OWNER | Inspired by #8 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/11/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413778585 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjU1NjU4MTEy | 12 | Support for numpy types, closes #11 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-02-24T03:57:32Z | 2019-02-24T04:02:20Z | 2019-02-24T04:02:20Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/12 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/12/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
413779210 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM3NzkyMTA= | 13 | Ability to automatically create IDs from content hash of row | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-02-24T04:07:08Z | 2019-02-24T04:36:48Z | 2019-02-24T04:36:48Z | OWNER | Sometimes when you are importing data the underlying source provides records without IDs that can be uniquely identified by their contents. A utility mechanism for calculating a sha1 hash of the contents and using that as a unique ID would be useful. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/13/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413842611 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM4NDI2MTE= | 14 | Utilities for adding indexes | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-02-24T16:57:28Z | 2019-02-24T19:11:28Z | 2019-02-24T19:11:28Z | OWNER | Both in the Python API and the CLI tool. For the CLI tool this should work:
This will create a compound index across col1 and col2. The name of the index will be automatically chosen unless you use the Support a |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/14/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413857257 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM4NTcyNTc= | 15 | Ability to add columns to tables | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-02-24T19:20:51Z | 2019-02-24T20:04:40Z | 2019-02-24T20:04:40Z | OWNER | Makes sense to do this before foreign keys in #2 Python:
CLI:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/15/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
349850687 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDk4NTA2ODc= | 2 | Mechanism for adding foreign keys to an existing table | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2018-08-12T22:50:56Z | 2019-02-24T21:34:41Z | 2019-02-24T21:34:41Z | OWNER | SQLite does not have ALTER TABLE support for adding new foreign keys... but it turns out it's possible to make these changes without having to duplicate the entire table by carefully running Here's how Django does it: https://github.com/django/django/blob/d3449faaa915a08c275b35de01e66a7ef6bdb2dc/django/db/backends/sqlite3/schema.py#L103-L125 And here's the official documentation about this: https://sqlite.org/lang_altertable.html#otheralter (scroll to the very bottom of the page) |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/2/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413868452 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM4Njg0NTI= | 17 | Improve and document foreign_keys=... argument to insert/create/etc | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 7 | 2019-02-24T21:09:11Z | 2019-02-24T23:45:48Z | 2019-02-24T23:45:48Z | OWNER | The It is not yet documented. It also requires you to specify the SQLite type of each column, even though this can be detected by introspecting the referenced table:
Relates to #2 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/17/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413871266 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM4NzEyNjY= | 18 | .insert/.upsert/.insert_all/.upsert_all should add missing columns | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1.0 4348046 | 2 | 2019-02-24T21:36:11Z | 2019-05-25T00:42:11Z | 2019-05-25T00:42:11Z | OWNER | This is a larger change, but it would be incredibly useful: if you attempt to insert or update a document with a field that does not currently exist in the underlying table, sqlite-utils should add the appropriate column for you. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/18/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
432217625 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MzIyMTc2MjU= | 19 | Incorrect help text for enable-fts command | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1.0 4348046 | 0 | 2019-04-11T19:46:44Z | 2019-05-25T00:44:31Z | 2019-05-25T00:44:31Z | OWNER | I clearly copied-and-pasted this from the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/19/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
448395665 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDgzOTU2NjU= | 22 | Release notes for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1.0 4348046 | 2 | 2019-05-25T00:58:03Z | 2019-05-25T01:18:27Z | 2019-05-25T01:06:52Z | OWNER | sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/22/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
448391492 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDgzOTE0OTI= | 21 | Option to ignore inserts if primary key exists already | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-05-25T00:17:12Z | 2019-05-29T05:09:01Z | 2019-05-29T04:18:26Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @psychemedia in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/18#issuecomment-480621924 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/21/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
413867537 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTM4Njc1Mzc= | 16 | add_column() should support REFERENCES {other_table}({other_column}) | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2019-02-24T21:00:45Z | 2019-05-29T05:17:59Z | 2019-05-29T04:56:18Z | OWNER | Related to #2 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
449848803 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4NDg4MDM= | 25 | Allow .insert(..., foreign_keys=()) to auto-detect table and primary key | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2019-05-29T14:39:22Z | 2019-06-13T05:32:32Z | 2019-06-13T05:32:32Z | OWNER | The |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/25/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
458941203 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTg5NDEyMDM= | 29 | Prevent accidental add-foreign-key with invalid column | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-06-20T23:57:24Z | 2019-06-20T23:58:26Z | 2019-06-20T23:58:26Z | OWNER | You can corrupt your database by running:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/29/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
462094937 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkyODc5MjA0 | 32 | db.add_foreign_keys() method | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-06-28T15:40:33Z | 2019-06-29T06:27:39Z | 2019-06-29T06:27:39Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/32 | Refs #31. Still TODO:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/32/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
461237618 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjEyMzc2MTg= | 31 | Mechanism for adding multiple foreign key constraints at once | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-06-27T00:04:30Z | 2019-06-29T06:27:40Z | 2019-06-29T06:27:40Z | OWNER | Needed by db-to-sqlite. It currently works by collecting all of the foreign key relationships it can find and then applying them at the end of the process. The problem is, the That means it's doing a full I think the right solution is to have a |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/31/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
462423839 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjI0MjM4Mzk= | 33 | index_foreign_keys / index-foreign-keys utilities | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-06-30T16:42:03Z | 2019-06-30T23:54:11Z | 2019-06-30T23:50:55Z | OWNER | Sometimes it's good to have indices on all columns that are foreign keys, to allow for efficient reverse lookups. This would be a useful utility:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/33/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
462423972 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkzMTE3MTgz | 34 | sqlite-utils index-foreign-keys / db.index_foreign_keys() | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-06-30T16:43:40Z | 2019-06-30T23:50:55Z | 2019-06-30T23:50:55Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/34 | Refs #33
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/34/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
455996809 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTU5OTY4MDk= | 28 | Rearrange the docs by area, not CLI vs Python | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-06-13T23:33:35Z | 2019-07-15T02:37:20Z | 2019-07-15T02:37:20Z | OWNER | The docs for eg inserting data should live on the same page, rather than being split across the API and CLI pages. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/28/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
462817589 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjI4MTc1ODk= | 36 | Support compound primary keys | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-07-01T17:00:07Z | 2019-07-15T04:28:52Z | 2019-07-15T04:28:52Z | OWNER | This should work:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/36/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
467928674 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjk3NDU5Nzk3 | 40 | .get() method plus support for compound primary keys | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-07-15T03:43:13Z | 2019-07-15T04:28:57Z | 2019-07-15T04:28:52Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/40 |
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/40/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
467864071 | MDU6SXNzdWU0Njc4NjQwNzE= | 39 | table.get(...) method | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-07-14T17:20:51Z | 2019-07-15T04:28:53Z | 2019-07-15T04:28:53Z | OWNER | Utility method for fetching a record by its primary key. Accepts a single value (for primary key / rowid tables) or a list/tuple of values (for compound primary keys, refs #36). Raises a |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/39/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
470131537 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzAxMzE1Mzc= | 41 | sqlite-utils insert --tsv option | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-07-19T04:27:21Z | 2019-07-19T04:50:47Z | 2019-07-19T04:50:47Z | OWNER | Right now we only support ingesting CSV, but sometimes interesting data is released as TSV. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/2019/07/18/how-download-use-dea-pain-pills-database/ for example. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/41/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
351845423 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNTE4NDU0MjM= | 3 | Experiment with contentless FTS tables | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2018-08-18T19:31:01Z | 2019-07-22T20:58:55Z | 2019-07-22T20:58:55Z | OWNER | Could greatly reduce size of resulting database for large datasets: http://cocoamine.net/blog/2015/09/07/contentless-fts4-for-large-immutable-documents/ |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/3/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
471684708 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAwMjg2NTM1 | 45 | Implemented table.lookup(...), closes #44 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-07-23T13:03:30Z | 2019-07-23T13:07:00Z | 2019-07-23T13:07:00Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/45 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/45/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
471628483 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzE2Mjg0ODM= | 44 | Utilities for building lookup tables | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-07-23T10:59:58Z | 2019-07-23T13:07:01Z | 2019-07-23T13:07:01Z | OWNER | While building https://github.com/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite I found a need for a neat mechanism for easily building lookup tables - tables where each unique value in a column is replaced by a foreign key to a separate table. csvs-to-sqlite currently creates those with its "extract" mechanism - but that's written as custom code against Pandas. I'd like to eventually replace Pandas with sqlite-utils there. See also #42 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/44/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
470691999 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzA2OTE5OTk= | 43 | .add_column() doesn't match indentation of initial creation | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-20T16:33:10Z | 2019-07-23T13:09:11Z | 2019-07-23T13:09:05Z | OWNER | I spotted a table which was created once and then had columns added to it and the formatted SQL looks like this:
It would be nice if the columns that were added later matched the indentation of the initial columns. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/43/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
471797101 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAwMzc3NTk5 | 47 | extracts= table parameter | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-07-23T16:30:29Z | 2019-07-23T17:00:43Z | 2019-07-23T17:00:43Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/47 | Still needs docs. Refs #46 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/47/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
471780443 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzE3ODA0NDM= | 46 | extracts= option for insert/update/etc | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-23T15:55:46Z | 2020-03-01T16:53:40Z | 2019-07-23T17:00:44Z | OWNER | Relates to #42 and #44. I want the ability to extract values out into lookup tables during bulk insert/upsert operations.
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
473733752 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAxODI0MDk3 | 51 | Fix for too many SQL variables, closes #50 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-07-28T11:30:30Z | 2019-07-28T11:59:32Z | 2019-07-28T11:59:32Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/51 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/51/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
473083260 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzMwODMyNjA= | 50 | "Too many SQL variables" on large inserts | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2019-07-25T21:43:31Z | 2022-11-04T14:38:36Z | 2019-07-28T11:59:33Z | OWNER | Reported here: https://github.com/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/9 It looks like there's a default limit of 999 variables - we need to be smart about that, maybe dynamically lower the batch size based on the number of columns. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/50/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
467862459 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjk3NDEyNDY0 | 38 | table.update() method | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-07-14T17:03:49Z | 2019-07-28T15:43:51Z | 2019-07-28T15:43:51Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/38 | Refs #35 Still to do:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/38/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
462430920 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjI0MzA5MjA= | 35 | table.update(...) method | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-06-30T18:06:15Z | 2019-07-28T15:43:52Z | 2019-07-28T15:43:52Z | OWNER | Spun off from #23 - this method will allow a user to update a specific row. Currently the only way to do that it is to call If the primary key is compound the first argument can be a tuple:
|
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/35/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
476436920 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAzOTkwNjgz | 53 | Work in progress: m2m() method for creating many-to-many records | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-08-03T10:03:56Z | 2019-08-04T03:38:10Z | 2019-08-04T03:37:33Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/53 |
Refs #23 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/53/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
449565204 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk1NjUyMDQ= | 23 | Syntactic sugar for creating m2m records | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2019-05-29T02:17:48Z | 2019-08-04T03:54:58Z | 2019-08-04T03:37:34Z | OWNER | Python library only. What would be a syntactically pleasant way of creating a m2m record? |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/23/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
481887482 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzA4MjkyNDQ3 | 55 | Ability to introspect and run queries against views | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-08-17T13:40:56Z | 2019-08-23T12:19:42Z | 2019-08-23T12:19:42Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/55 | See #54 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/55/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
488338965 | MDU6SXNzdWU0ODgzMzg5NjU= | 59 | Ability to introspect triggers | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-09-02T23:47:16Z | 2019-09-03T01:52:36Z | 2019-09-03T00:09:42Z | OWNER | Now that we're creating triggers (thanks to @amjith in #57) it would be neat if we could introspect them too. I'm thinking:
The underlying query for this is I'll return the trigger information in a new namedtuple, similar to how Indexes and ForeignKeys work. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/59/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
488341021 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzEzMzgzMzE3 | 60 | db.triggers and table.triggers introspection | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-09-03T00:04:32Z | 2019-09-03T00:09:42Z | 2019-09-03T00:09:42Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/60 | Closes #59 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/60/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
517241040 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MTcyNDEwNDA= | 63 | ensure_index() method | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-11-04T15:51:22Z | 2019-11-04T16:20:36Z | 2019-11-04T16:20:35Z | OWNER |
This will do the following: - if the specified table or column does not exist, do nothing - if they exist and already have an index, do nothing - otherwise, create the index I want this for tools like twitter-to-sqlite search where the |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/63/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
519032008 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzM3ODQ3NTcz | 64 | test_insert_upsert_all_empty_list | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-11-07T04:24:45Z | 2019-11-07T04:32:38Z | 2019-11-07T04:32:38Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/64 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/64/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
476413293 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzY0MTMyOTM= | 52 | Throws error if .insert_all() / .upsert_all() called with empty list | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2019-08-03T04:09:00Z | 2019-11-07T04:32:39Z | 2019-11-07T04:32:39Z | OWNER | sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/52/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||||
519039316 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzM3ODUzMzk0 | 65 | Release 1.12.1 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-11-07T04:51:29Z | 2019-11-07T04:58:48Z | 2019-11-07T04:58:47Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/65 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/65/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
542814756 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDI4MTQ3NTY= | 71 | Tests are failing due to missing FTS5 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-12-27T09:41:16Z | 2019-12-27T09:49:37Z | 2019-12-27T09:49:37Z | OWNER | https://travis-ci.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/jobs/268436167 This is a recent change: 2 months ago they worked fine. I'm not sure what changed here. Maybe something to do with https://launchpad.net/~jonathonf/+archive/ubuntu/backports ? |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/71/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
543738004 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzU3OTkyNTg4 | 72 | Fixed implementation of upsert | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2019-12-30T05:08:05Z | 2019-12-30T05:29:24Z | 2019-12-30T05:29:24Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/72 | Refs #66 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/72/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
529376481 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzQ2MjY0OTI2 | 67 | Run tests against 3.5 too | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2019-11-27T14:20:35Z | 2019-12-31T01:29:44Z | 2019-12-31T01:29:43Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/67 | sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/67/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);